0
   

Fix the budget yourself

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 11:56 am
How can you say 'I didn't eliminate anything' and then say 'I eliminated these things' in the same paragraph?!?!!?!?!?!!

Quote:
Cyclo,
This was your response when I said college was not a right.

Quote:
What a crock, MM!


So,one can only assume that you disagree with my statement.
BTW,I am NOT advocating that the govt pay for college educations,I am advocating the exact opposite.
I dont believe that the govt has the obligation to pay for your education past high school.
You want it,you pay for it.


Your whole post was a crock. I never said college was a right, either; just that it is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level.

Well, I don't believe the gov't has an obligation to spend so much money on the military. Hell, we don't even have to have a standing military - if you don't believe me, just read some of the Federalist Papers. So yes, we could drastically cut military spending if we wished to do so.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 12:02 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
How can you say 'I didn't eliminate anything' and then say 'I eliminated these things' in the same paragraph?!?!!?!?!?!!

Quote:
Cyclo,
This was your response when I said college was not a right.

Quote:
What a crock, MM!


So,one can only assume that you disagree with my statement.
BTW,I am NOT advocating that the govt pay for college educations,I am advocating the exact opposite.
I dont believe that the govt has the obligation to pay for your education past high school.
You want it,you pay for it.


Your whole post was a crock. I never said college was a right, either; just that it is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level.

Well, I don't believe the gov't has an obligation to spend so much money on the military. Hell, we don't even have to have a standing military - if you don't believe me, just read some of the Federalist Papers. So yes, we could drastically cut military spending if we wished to do so.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe I wasnt clear.
I didnt eliminate any govt agencies or depts,just some of what I consider wasteful spending.

I agree with this statement completely..."is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level",but I dont believe it is the govts responsibility to pay for it.
The govt should encourage it,they should promote it,but they shouldnt pay for it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 12:12 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
How can you say 'I didn't eliminate anything' and then say 'I eliminated these things' in the same paragraph?!?!!?!?!?!!

Quote:
Cyclo,
This was your response when I said college was not a right.

Quote:
What a crock, MM!


So,one can only assume that you disagree with my statement.
BTW,I am NOT advocating that the govt pay for college educations,I am advocating the exact opposite.
I dont believe that the govt has the obligation to pay for your education past high school.
You want it,you pay for it.


Your whole post was a crock. I never said college was a right, either; just that it is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level.

Well, I don't believe the gov't has an obligation to spend so much money on the military. Hell, we don't even have to have a standing military - if you don't believe me, just read some of the Federalist Papers. So yes, we could drastically cut military spending if we wished to do so.

Cycloptichorn


Maybe I wasnt clear.
I didnt eliminate any govt agencies or depts,just some of what I consider wasteful spending.

I agree with this statement completely..."is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level",but I dont believe it is the govts responsibility to pay for it.
The govt should encourage it,they should promote it,but they shouldnt pay for it.


That's exactly what the government is currently doing, and what you cut out - encouraging and promoting college education through the underwriting of loans.

I left college with 30k in loans. The gov't paid about 1k in my interest during the whole time I was there. Now I have paid that 30k back. Overall, the bank made money and I got educated, and for a very small fee the gov't has another educated citizen who is far more likely to vote, to achieve a higher position in life, and to take an active role in their society. Hardly a bad trade.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 12:34 pm
Cyclo,
To avoid a ridiculously long post,I am going to eliminate everything above your last post...


Quote:
That's exactly what the government is currently doing, and what you cut out - encouraging and promoting college education through the underwriting of loans.

I left college with 30k in loans. The gov't paid about 1k in my interest during the whole time I was there. Now I have paid that 30k back. Overall, the bank made money and I got educated, and for a very small fee the gov't has another educated citizen who is far more likely to vote, to achieve a higher position in life, and to take an active role in their society. Hardly a bad trade.


It is not the govts responsibility or obligation to underwrite your loans.

You CHOSE to go to college,you CHOSE to accrue the 30K in loans,and you CHOSE to be responsible for them.

By making the choices you made,you accepted the responsibility.
Why should the govt pay for your choices?
When I went to college,I paid my own way.
When I had the money I went,when I didnt I stopped going.
I didnt ask the govt to help me,nor did I expect them to.

BTW,you dont need a college education to be "far more likely to vote, to achieve a higher position in life, and to take an active role in their society"
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 12:48 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Cyclo,
To avoid a ridiculously long post,I am going to eliminate everything above your last post...


Quote:
That's exactly what the government is currently doing, and what you cut out - encouraging and promoting college education through the underwriting of loans.

I left college with 30k in loans. The gov't paid about 1k in my interest during the whole time I was there. Now I have paid that 30k back. Overall, the bank made money and I got educated, and for a very small fee the gov't has another educated citizen who is far more likely to vote, to achieve a higher position in life, and to take an active role in their society. Hardly a bad trade.


It is not the govts responsibility or obligation to underwrite your loans.


I agree, and didn't say that it was either their responsibility or obligation to do so. I merely said that it is in their best interests to do so. It would be helpful if you would address the actual things that I've said in my responses rather than the arguments you would like to argue against.

Quote:
You CHOSE to go to college,you CHOSE to accrue the 30K in loans,and you CHOSE to be responsible for them.

By making the choices you made,you accepted the responsibility.


Okay, noone is contesting that the responsibility for paying for college lies with those who go (though I would rather the gov't provided it for everyone in the fashion that other civilized countries do).

Quote:
Why should the govt pay for your choices?


The gov't underwrites college loans because otherwise students simply couldn't get them. They have no collateral with which to offer the bank in return for the loan, no credit score because many of them are under 18 or simply haven't built any credit up.

Without gov't underwriting, college loans for the poor - who need them the most, mind you - simply would not exist. You should research this subject more before you decide that this is 'unneccesary.'

Quote:
When I went to college,I paid my own way.
When I had the money I went,when I didnt I stopped going.
I didnt ask the govt to help me,nor did I expect them to.


I didn't ask the gov't to help either. No student does. Instead, you ask a bank to help. College loans are not given out by the gov't but by private banking institutions. These loans are then underwritten by the gov't for the reasons stated above. This is somewhat similar to the FDIC which guarantees your deposits in a bank - not really necessary, not the gov'ts obligation to do so, but in the best interests of every citizen.

Quote:
BTW,you dont need a college education to be "far more likely to vote, to achieve a higher position in life, and to take an active role in their society"


You don't need a college education to do those things, but college education does make it more likely that you will do those things, especially 'achieve a higher position in life.'

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 01:10 pm
Cyclop,
You must have missed the part where I agreed with this statement..."is in the best interests of the country to see people educated to the highest level".

I 100% agree with you on that.
But,I didnt ask the govt or a bank to help pay my way thru college either.
I dont agree with you when you say a young student cant get collateral either.
Many young people can get a loan for a $30,000 or $40,000 car,so getting a loan for school, shouldnt be a problem for them.
If someone truly wants to go to college,they will find a way to do it on their own,without any aid from the govt and without having to get loans to do it.
Maybe then they will appreciate it more,and actually study.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 01:17 pm
Quote:

I dont agree with you when you say a young student cant get collateral either.
Many young people can get a loan for a $30,000 or $40,000 car,so getting a loan for school, shouldnt be a problem for them.


This is simply untrue. I don't see where you come up with the idea that 17 and 18 year olds can get loans for 30k cars. I used to work in the Auto sales business and I can tell you that this is completely untrue, in fact; we wouldn't have given a loan to someone with no credit record and no collateral in a million years.

This is nothing more than supposition on your part. Additionally, while you paid for your own school (which I applaud), I would submit that the cost of college has risen dramatically in the last 15 years (which I bet was after you went to college). Without holding down a full-time job, it is not possible for the independent student to pay for their own college these days.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Jan, 2007 01:43 pm
So the govt. is supposed to encourage college educations without paying for anything? What type of encouragement are you advocating? Advertising? Pins with ribbons?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 10:16:45