With all due respect, I think we have reached a new level of bizarro-wackiness now. There is a considerable difference between proclaiming
oneself a slave to god and me deciding that you, hankarin, ought to be
my slave for a good long while because my god says it's okay by him.
I understand that part of what you are saying is poetic. Slaves to love and all. But you ask :
Quote:What moved those Christians to become willing slaves of God? Well, what was the motivating force in the case of the Israelite slave who renounced his personal freedom? Was it not love for his master?
The answer, as any good psychcologist could tell you, is we don't know without asking them, but we can, as you have, make some guesses.
Maybe the slave was so traumatized by the experience he sought to continue his captivity. That would make his cleaving to my master either a case of sado-masochism or an early example of Stockholm Syndrome.
Maybe slavery and the conditions thereof so stunted the captive's ability to act on his own that he felt unsafe and insecure in a condition of freedom. Ask any inmate released after twenty years or so how it feels to walk down a unfenced street the first ten or twenty times? Freedom has become an un-natural condition for them.
Slavery of any kind, I hope you would agree, is a unnatural state for any human being, but the use of it to promote the love of god seems particularly weird and slightly pathological. Then again, the more one looks at the Christian myth the more one sees odd things: consumption of corpus transubstantiated, virgin births and persons rising into the air unaided by wings together with lots of blood being shed by brutalized victims of injustice.
Joe(There's a foregleam of the type of slavery promoted by the believers.)Nation