1
   

media reform bill may prevent possible 'fascist' takeover

 
 
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 04:08 pm
Rep. believes Democratic media reform bill needed to prevent possible 'fascist' takeover of US media

Miriam Raftery

Rep. Hinchey: New bill would break up media monopolies & restore fairness doctrine; Warns media reform critical to prevent 'end of Democratic republic'

Concerns about monopolies and fears of a possible "fascist" takeover of the US media have prompted a Democratic congressman to push to restore the Fairness Doctrine, RAW STORY has learned.

"Media reform is the most important issue confronting our democratic republic and the people of our country," Representative Maurice Hinchey (D-New York) said at the Free Press National Media Reform Conference held in Memphis, Tennessee last weekend. "This is a critical moment in history that may determine the future of our country…maybe forever."

Hinchey told RAW STORY he plans to reintroduce the Media Ownership Reform Act (MORA) that would break up media monopolies and restore the Fairness Doctrine, which was eliminated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under the Reagan administration.

"If Rush shoots his mouth off, he must give equal access to our side," Hinchey said. "The American public will begin to get both sides or all sides of an issue. That is basic?-fundamental to a democracy."

Last year, Hinchey introduced H.R. 3302 (MORA), but Republicans blocked the measure in committee. He also founded the Future of American Media Caucus in Congress in 2005. With Democrats now in control of Congress, a new media reform measure should be assigned to the House Energy & Commerce Committee within the next couple of weeks, Hinchey's staff confirmed.

"We'll be trying hard to get the subcommittee and the full committee chairs to bring this to the House Floor," Hinchey pledged. A companion bill will be introduced on the Senate side by Bernie Sanders (D-VT), he added.

Specifically, MORA would restore the Fairness Doctrine, reinstate a national cap on ownership of radio stations, lower the number of radio stations that one company can own in a local market, and reinstate the 25 percent national cap on television ownership, among other restrictions. The bill's no-grandfathering provision would compel media conglomerates to divest to comply with new ownership limitations.

MORA would also require public interest reports from broadcasters, and require more independently produced programming on TV. In addition, it establishes new public interest obligations to assure that broadcasters meet needs of local communities and requires increased, sustained public input and outreach to give the people a voice in programming.

Media 'con job'
Hinchey faults..... http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Rep._believes_Democratic_media_reform_bill_0121.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 483 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 08:23 pm
Sounds like a good bill, but is probably too late to do much good. The damage has already been done.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 09:23 pm
Butrflynet, there is a stranglehold for sure. Could be impossible to break up.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:18 pm
Is that the reason why Hugo Chavez is shutting down opposition media in Venezuela, to prevent a fascist takeover?

You people would be funny if you weren't dangerous.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Jan, 2007 10:38 pm
I don't care what the motives are, there is damage being done to one of the few guardians of the peoples' voice. That's all voices, okie.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 08:15 am
Censorship plain and simple.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 08:24 am
Re: media reform bill may prevent possible 'fascist' takeove
blueflame1, quoting rawstory.com wrote:
"If Rush shoots his mouth off, he must give equal access to our side," Hinchey said. "The American public will begin to get both sides or all sides of an issue. That is basic?-fundamental to a democracy."

If there is a fascist takeover of American media (which I don't think there is), will it be prevented because Rush Limbaugh switches to a Hannity & Colmes format? A format where a dominant rightwinger and a feeble, idiotic left-winger deliver "both sides of the issue"? I doubt it, yet such a farce would satisfy the media reform bill.

From what I glean from your article, this bill is a botched solution to a non-problem.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 06:42 pm
Re: media reform bill may prevent possible 'fascist' takeove
Thomas wrote:
blueflame1, quoting rawstory.com wrote:
"If Rush shoots his mouth off, he must give equal access to our side," Hinchey said. "The American public will begin to get both sides or all sides of an issue. That is basic?-fundamental to a democracy."

If there is a fascist takeover of American media (which I don't think there is), will it be prevented because Rush Limbaugh switches to a Hannity & Colmes format? A format where a dominant rightwinger and a feeble, idiotic left-winger deliver "both sides of the issue"? I doubt it, yet such a farce would satisfy the media reform bill.

From what I glean from your article, this bill is a botched solution to a non-problem.


Thomas, it is an attempt to shut up talk radio, because liberal talk radio falls on its face here. Liberals don't listen, so advertising falls flat, and the programs go broke, plain and simple. Liberal thinking is emotionally based rather than fact based, so it does not lend itself to talk radio analysis.

The government forcing a balance here is akin to the government demanding equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans in government, which is ridiculous. This is supposed to be a free country, which would include the right of people to listen to whatever they choose to listen to, and those programs that are listened to stay on the air because those are the shows that interest people and therefore advertisers are willing to pay to advertise on programs that have good listenership. Nobody wants to waste money advertising on shows that nobody is going to hear, and stations do not like losing money.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 06:59 pm
I think the legislation is aimed at situations like this than anything else, "Clear Channel: the Media Mammoth that Stole the Airwaves". http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/articles/02/1125148.html
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Jan, 2007 07:17 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
I think the legislation is aimed at situations like this than anything else, "Clear Channel: the Media Mammoth that Stole the Airwaves". http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/articles/02/1125148.html


How emotional of you, blueflame.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Jan, 2007 03:27 am
blueflame1 wrote:
I think the legislation is aimed at situations like this than anything else, "Clear Channel: the Media Mammoth that Stole the Airwaves". http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/articles/02/1125148.html

Again, how would "Hannity and Colmes" conflict with the letter of the bill? I think it wouldn't. And if you believe Rush Limbaugh is problematic, what would the improvement be if he changed his show into a "Hannity and Colmes" format? I don't think there would be any. Not for any sufficiently weak liberal in the Colmes role. Because there is no legal test for weakness of talk show host arguments, I don't think a reintroduction of the fairness doctrine would serve its stated purpose.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » media reform bill may prevent possible 'fascist' takeover
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/31/2026 at 11:58:53