Well, read this, libs and Bush haters:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003525710
In light of this, perhaps we need to review Woodward's credibility concerning an interview of a man past 90? Remember Woodwards Casey's deathbed interview that has been accused as being bogus? And besides, does the man have so little honor to not wait at least 30 days, or at least until the man's funeral is over? This simply shows most of all Woodward's character more than anything else, and it aint purty.
Another comment concerning how the mainstream press is so pathetic. What do people remember about Ford that first comes to mind. For many, its his clumsiness. This was the angle of the phony press to try to make Ford out as some hapless, clumsy guy that sort of lucked into being president. Never mind the fact he was probably the most athletic of any president and far more agile than those poking fun. He was an All American football star on a 2 time college football national championship team, and could have played professional, but instead chose to take a loftier career path that ended up where he did. And of course the hated Rumsfeld and Cheney served in his administration.
So the record will show the title of this thread is of course bogus.
As if Saddam Hussein isn't guilty as hell of the crimes he was condemned for. Bin Laden is a piker in comparison.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace