1
   

Bush loaded Broadcasting Board of Governors with Republicans

 
 
Reply Sat 23 Dec, 2006 10:29 am
McKinnon's appointment to broadcasting board angers Democrats
By Maria Recio
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - President Bush's media adviser, Mark McKinnon, got a recess appointment Wednesday night from the White House to be a member of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, a little-known but influential federal agency that oversees U.S. government-sponsored news outlets such as the Voice of America.

Why would he need a recess appointment - a presidential perk to get around Congress? The Democrat-turned-Republican media consultant's nomination languished for nearly a year and a half in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Senate Democrats were livid when the Texan was first nominated for a Democratic slot on the board. His quick re-nomination as a Republican - the longtime Texas Democrat now calls himself a "Bush Republican" - did not appease them, either.

Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., the incoming Senate Foreign Relations Committee who takes over in January, was not likely to move McKinnon's nomination, said insiders, prompting the White House action.

"The nomination had been out there a very long time and we needed to fill the position," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto. "This was the most expedient way to get that slot filled."

The recess appointment lasts for one year for the part-time position. McKinnon is expected to be formally nominated for the position, as well, but is unlikely to get any further in a Senate controlled by Democrats than he did in one run by Republicans.

While presidential politics may or may not be at play - Biden is a presidential aspirant and McKinnon is an adviser to the all-but-announced presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. - sources close to the issue say the problem is Broadcasting Board of Governors chairman Kenneth Tomlinson.

"The issue is Tomlinson," said a Senate official close to the controversy, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Democrats view Tomlinson as partisan, and some question his ethics after a report by the State Department's inspector general, released in August, said he misused government funds for two years, including using the office's resources to promote his private horse racing operation.

Tomlinson, who denied the conclusions, serves as the board of governors' chair in one of four Republican slots. There are four Democratic slots with the ninth member being the secretary of state. Karen Hughes, Bush's close confidante and image-maker, now the undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, represents Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the board.

Because of a Democratic vacancy, McKinnon's appointment tips the balance of the board to the Republicans. That gives Tomlinson, Democrats say, effective control of the board.

Tomlinson's own nomination has been an issue for more than two years. But the chairman, whose board membership expired in 2004, continues to serve under the provision of the law that created the board. Biden co-authored that law.
---------------------------------------------

For more information on the Broadcasting Board of Governors, see http://www.bbg.gov
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 374 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Dec, 2006 10:38 am
He should load the board with democrats? Laughing
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 06:55 am
LoneStarMadam wrote:
He should load the board with democrats? Laughing


He should appoint individuals who have competence and experience relative to the posting, who are not political operatives or ideologues.

He should do that because if he does not, then he gives licence to the next dem president to do precisely the same thing that he has done - strip government agencies of competent people who understand their proper function as working for the electorate and replace them with people whose fundamental allegiance is partisan and whose competence and experience is often very poor.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 09:37 am
Blatham
Blatham, this practice is why the Bush administration has been so incompetent from top to bottom.

BBB
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 09:58 am
I know. And it is going to entail, with a dem president, the removal of all these people (who match the description).

And that's what really frosts me because of the immense waste of time, personnel and expense that follows from an overhaul of all these countless agencies. If personnel placement is done as Bush has done it, an ideological purge will follow every change of government and whatever expertise exists or has been gained is then lost as the new broom sweeps clean.

I truly despise these people. But if one's ideological position is to hold government as a worthless or unnecessary entity, then it follows that governing will be done poorly and for other reasons than for the citizens - for personal and partisan gain.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 10:16 am
Blatham
Blatham, FEMA is but one example of political appointees destroying competent service to the public. Under Clinton, James Witt had reformed FEMA and turned it in to a competent agency even though it was underfunded. He was successful because he had the requisite experience and expertise to succeed.

The biggest problem with Republican administrations is that they don't believe in agency government. Their appointees' missions are to decrease the size and effectiveness of agencies to reduce costs and to eliminate interference in laze faire capitalism. They don't like regulation of any kind. They expect people to be on their own in the face of disasters. They are only willing to spend money if it is in their interests and protects their lives and treasure.

Corporate greed and the people be damned!


BBB
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 11:12 am
blatham wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
He should load the board with democrats? Laughing


He should appoint individuals who have competence and experience relative to the posting, who are not political operatives or ideologues.

He should do that because if he does not, then he gives licence to the next dem president to do precisely the same thing that he has done - strip government agencies of competent people who understand their proper function as working for the electorate and replace them with people whose fundamental allegiance is partisan and whose competence and experience is often very poor.

Yes, yes, i am soooo sure the dems would never have thought of loading anything with like minded people. For instance, the dems would never have thought of getting rid of every US Attorney & replacing them with their own. I'm sure you remember that, right, back in '93?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Dec, 2006 03:43 pm
Re: Blatham
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Blatham, this practice is why the Bush administration has been so incompetent from top to bottom.

BBB


So what your saying is Clinton didn't appoint only Dems to such posts? So these same people who were so upset about the Reps having everything now almost have everything themselves and are still upset. When does it end? When you have the Senate, Congress and the President are you going to stop or will things suddenly be ok and right with the world?

Another thing how come there have been no complaints of voting issues this election cycle? Or I know the Dems won most everything so it had to be right this time?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush loaded Broadcasting Board of Governors with Republicans
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.3 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 09:40:03