Re: 'We're Going to Win'
Zippo wrote:Monte Cargo wrote:
I've never waivered from my belief that the strategic course of the Iraq War has been very successful, including defeating Saddam's Ba-athist regime in 23 days
I've never waivered from my belief that 3yrs later, Baathists are now needed to help in Iraq.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/12/16/iraq.conference/index.html
Only Iraqis can save themselves....sooner US realizes, the sooner we stop our losses....
Above, you mentioned that there were no WMD in Iraq. Later, you quoted a source that postulated that Republican Guard's General Georges-Sada testified and authored a book that is merely part of a Lukid conspiracy.
There exists no credible report that there were no WMD in Iraq.
Saddam Hussein was a deranged and corrupt dictator who paid off nations through the oil for food program and traded petrodollars for looking the other way at his WMD program and the other provisions of UN resolution 1441.
There never was any direct connection between Saddam Hussein and the 9-11 tragedy. George Tenet, the former CIA director was on record as indicating that Ba-athists, Al Queida, militant Shiite groups, and other extremist Islamic militants would cooperate against western intervention. Saddam's role was not, as you suggested, in a direct relationship with 9-11 or Al Queida, but as a facilitator of arms to rogue terrorist organizations.
One of the other reasons we went to war, also not mentioned in your list is Bush's statement that a successful war effort and spreading of democracy would serve as a beacon to other nations who have extremist militant governments, and inspire the public at large to overthrow those governments.
If you read the article at
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061211/wl_mideast_afp/irandemostudents_061211165012, which reports students yelling "Death to the dictator!" and where students protested and burned Ahmadinejad's pictures, there is some kernel of truth in this. Once again, Kadafi surredered his nuclear materials and WMD program to Bush, citing the U.S. led invasion in Iraq as the triggering cause of Libya's surrending of their nuclear program.
Conversely, doing nothing and adopting an appeasement posture will not only assure a nuclear Iran, and a possible missle attack on Israel, but six other Arab nations have indicated their additional willingness to develop nuclear weapons if Iran succeeds in building a nuclear bomb.
Adopting the suggestions of the Iraq study group would most certainly lead to a unfathomable loss of U.S. respect, bloodbaths in Iraq while Syria and Iran divide the spoils and the oil, and assure a level of shortage of fossile fuels to this country that could only be described as devastating. There is no upside to adopting the Iraq report.
The terrorists love it though. You can read about it
here.
Quote:"The report proves that this is the era of Islam and of jihad," said Abu Ayman, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin.
The Islamic Jihad terror group is responsible for every suicide bombing in Israel during the past two years.
"[With the Iraq Study Group report], the Americans came to the conclusion that Islam is the new giant of the world and it would be clever to reduce hostilities with this giant. In the Quran the principle of the rotation is clear and according to this principle the end of the Americans and of all non-believers is getting closer," Abu Ayman said.