Reply
Tue 12 Dec, 2006 05:26 pm
Yes, lets choose a little hitler look- alike white fellow, he would be much better than an appealing, good looking, well educated, well spoken, not vitrolic, black man. Appearances count, you know.
What the hell are you talking about, LSW? You care to translate for everyone else? I'm sure there's perfect understanding between you and the voices in your head, but the rest of us need reference points that actually come from something in the present dimension.
snood wrote:What the hell are you talking about, LSW? You care to translate for everyone else? I'm sure there's perfect understanding between you and the voices in your head, but the rest of us need reference points that actually come from something in the present dimension.
WHO the hell are you
talking to?
LSW? I'm sure the gremlins in your fingers made you do that.
Talking to you, genius. But you knew that.
snood wrote:Talking to you, genius. But you knew that.
If you could spell my name,
genius, it might help. I'll give you a hint, it's spelled (if you're just using my initials, otherwise it may be difficult for you)
LSM, no thanks required.
She's got jokes. And it really is funny - spelling lessons from you... Have you looked at some of your recent posts?
and besides all that fascingating back-and-forth about whose spelling is better... You want to try to explain what the hell you mentioned Hitler for?
snood wrote:She's got jokes. And it really is funny - spelling lessons from you... Have you looked at some of your recent posts?
and besides all that fascingating back-and-forth about whose spelling is better... You want to try to explain what the hell you mentioned Hitler for?
Ah, so
now you want to get back to the topic, well, bully for you.
Because Kucinich looks like hitler, put a moustache on that little communist & he'd be adolphs double.
Taking out the idiotic gauge for Hitlerian usages... .... ... ....
yes.
Joe(way too early)Nation
I didn't stray from the subject old lady - you did, when you pointed out I wrote a 'w' instead of an 'm'.
But no matter. Congrats. I keep thinking you can't sink to any deeper deranged, bigoted barf - and you keep proving me wrong.
snood wrote:I didn't stray from the subject old lady - you did, when you pointed out I wrote a 'w' instead of an 'm'.
But no matter. Congrats. I keep thinking you can't sink to any deeper deranged, bigoted barf - and you keep proving me wrong.
I accepted the fact that i have sunk low when I answered your first childish post, what was it you said,
cricket or some such silly schoolgirl prattle.
However, in order to
keep up here with some of you, one must sink low.
You've had more flame exchanges in less time than anyone since massagatto. Be proud.
Wow. A thread that turned
Godwin on the second post.
I'm impressed.
No great feat for a lofty thinker like LSM.
snood wrote:You've had more flame exchanges in less time than anyone since massagatto. Be proud.
Yeah, I tend to fight back.
I've just begun to appreciate the descriptor "fuckwit fundy"
LoneStarMadam wrote:snood wrote:You've had more flame exchanges in less time than anyone since massagatto. Be proud.
Yeah, I tend to fight back.
I believe he was saying that you've initiated and commanded more flame wars than anyone has in such little time.
There are no prizes for "fighting back" when you're tucked safely behind the veil of anonymity your PC provides you with.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace