Bipartisan panel says Bush admin underreports Iraq violence

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Nooo, you're trying to backslap the fact that the under-reporting is new.

Oh, okay. So your only statement was that under-reporting is nothing new. Well, I can agree with that. Remember "Comical Ali"? He was quite good at under-reporting, too.

Now, my question would be: why does the Bush administration do that? Why did the Saddam regime do that? Because things are considerably worse than they want their population to know?

You Republicans sure have been on edge lately.

And there's more to come. Much more.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

You Republicans sure have been on edge lately.

And there's more to come. Much more.

Cycloptichorn

Not speaking as a Republican, but just an American, I'm sure there is much more to come, what's your point?

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

You Republicans sure have been on edge lately.

And there's more to come. Much more.

Cycloptichorn

Not speaking as a Republican, but just an American, I'm sure there is much more to come, what's your point?

Oh, I meant more things that Republicans don't like.

More investigations or Iraq war intelligence manipulation.

More investigations of fraud cover-ups.

More investigations of energy meetings with Cheney and oil execs.

More investigations of torture and abuses at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.

More investigations of Warrantless Wiretapping.

It isn't going to be pretty, I guarantee. What with Bush's popularity and support already in the toilet, things could go downhill for him very very quickly.

Cycloptichorn

*whew*

Good thing the law doesn't give 2-shites about popularity. Otherwise his popularity might matter. The investigations won't turn anything up except for a Republican President in 2008.

Cycloptichorn wrote:

LoneStarMadam wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

You Republicans sure have been on edge lately.

And there's more to come. Much more.

Cycloptichorn

Not speaking as a Republican, but just an American, I'm sure there is much more to come, what's your point?

Oh, I meant more things that Republicans don't like.

More investigations or Iraq war intelligence manipulation.

More investigations of fraud cover-ups.

More investigations of energy meetings with Cheney and oil execs.

More investigations of torture and abuses at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.

More investigations of Warrantless Wiretapping.

It isn't going to be pretty, I guarantee. What with Bush's popularity and support already in the toilet, things could go downhill for him very very quickly.

Cycloptichorn

Again, not speaking as a Republican because I'm not one, & again as an American, I welcome the investigations that Pelosi says won't happen, (or was that the "I" word) because if there is fraud & cover ups, etc, we should know about it & it should be dealt with.
I, unlike some, want what's best for this country, if a president, ANY president,(I don't care what law he or she broke) breaks the law, betrays this country, then it needs to be known & the punishment should be swift & harsh.

Seems a lot of you can't read through your liberal bias glasses. No one has excused or justified anything but that hasn't stopped you from ejaculating all over the thread with the same old crap.

Merely commenting that it is nothing new in no way tries to justify anything. Parados is right, it IS like talking to children.

I would encourage you to start researching the issue of Warrantless Wiretapping yourself; I don't want to come off as preachy, but there is little doubt that the law is being broken; all the facts of the matter neccessary to make that decision are well known.

You'll be seeing much more about it in the next year or so

Cycloptichorn

McGentrix wrote:

Seems a lot of you can't read through your liberal bias glasses. No one has excused or justified anything but that hasn't stopped you from ejaculating all over the thread with the same old crap.

Merely commenting that it is nothing new in no way tries to justify anything. Parados is right, it IS like talking to children.

This board is filled with you trying to justify the actions of Bush McG. Often by pointing out that others have done it first. You have tied together that "justification" with "others doing it" so many times they are the same thing when you speak.