1
   

Slow and Fatal Justice: Priscilla Owens

 
 
PDiddie
 
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 07:07 am
Jack Ayres keeps a framed photograph of Willie Searcy on his desk. Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen doesn't. She should. Both Texas lawyers were in the thick of the court battle to save the life of the African-American teenager paralyzed in a head-on collision that left him unable to breathe on his own. Ayres was Willie's attorney; Owen, the justice who sent his case back for a new trial. You might say she had the final word on Willie Searcy's lawsuit against Ford.

At least it was final for Willie.

US Senate Democrats thought they had the final word on Owen when the Judiciary Committee killed her nomination to the federal appeals bench last September. Then Republicans took back the Senate in November. When Bush resubmitted Owen's name, the Democratic minority prepared to filibuster to stop her. For a bit, Senators Dianne Feinstein of California and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana weren't ready to support a filibuster blocking a woman's confirmation to the bench.

Willie Searcy helped convince them.

George Bush was a minority owner of the Texas Rangers in 1993 when a Mercury Cougar plowed into the Ford pickup Willie's stepfather was driving south of Dallas. No one died. But for the rest of his life, Willie would be a ventilator-dependent quadriplegic. He would need full-time nursing care and a room full of high-tech equipment. It would cost millions to keep him alive: $22 million if he stayed home with constant medical care. "If he lived in an assisted environment . . . that number would probably be $26 million," Ayres told the jury. "I make no apology for telling you that."

The jury wasn't offended. Two years after Willie was removed from the wreckage on I-35, 12 jurors decided that Ford's seat belt had failed and awarded Searcy's mother $30 million ?- plus $10 million in punitive damages. The award put Willie on a collision course with Justice Owen.

Prissy Owen was a Karl Rove candidate, an oil and gas lawyer recruited to the Texas Supreme Court by the political strategist Bush moved into the West Wing office once occupied by Hillary Clinton. Owen is 47. Smart but not cerebral. A bit lazy. An evangelical so opposed to abortion that a fellow justice called her attempt to narrow the state's parental-consent abortion law "an unconscionable act of judicial activism." (That justice was Alberto Gonzales, now Bush's White House counsel.) She's profoundly pro-business. And responsible for the most restrictive open-records ruling imposed on Texans since Santa Anna seized the diaries of the defenders of the Alamo. The perfect Bush candidate for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.

Ford appealed, which was expected considering the size of the award. The company is no easy mark. In the mid-'90s it was winning 80 percent of its cases. It had delayed Willie's trial. Ford sent attorneys to a Texas prison to try to persuade the boy's estranged biological father to intervene. A Ford attorney even told Ayers to make a settlement offer the company could accept or it would drag the case along indefinitely.

The case scraped through an appeals court, which struck down the $10 million punitive damages. Ford appealed the $30 million verdict to the state Supreme Court. And Ayres filed a motion to expedite the case. Ford even joined him in the motion. "We were in a race to save the kid's life," Ayres said.

Owen was in no hurry. Almost two years later, she handed down the court's split decision. The case would be retried in Dallas, rather than in the small town where Ayres won the $40 million verdict. And here's why Owen deserves to be singled out for delaying justice and treatment for Willie: She wrote a long opinion on the Texas venue statute, one of those seemingly important lawyerly things to do to make sure the statute could be correctly applied in future cases. But there would be no future cases. After the suit was filed, the statute had been replaced by a new, restrictive venue law then-Governor Bush pushed through the Legislature in 1995. In effect, Owen was using time marked by Willie Searcy's regulated breathing to elaborate on a piece of legal history. She could have quickly moved the case without working to persuade a majority of justices to sign onto an opinion. But she subjected Willie Searcy to the "results-oriented" process that is a signature mark of the Texas Supreme Court. Ford wanted the case retried in a friendly venue in Dallas; Owen's belabored opinion liberally interpreted the law to achieve that outcome. "You look in other places, it seems to me, to find a rationale not to do what the Texas law called for," Feinstein said at last summer's committee hearing. "It seemed to me that you ?- and maybe this is what being an activist means ?- that you worked to come out where you came out in your opinion."

That criticism sounds a bit precious in the Great State. Corporations and defense firms pay for judicial elections. They expect what Lyndon used to call a "bang for their buck." In the Searcy case, Baker Botts, the Houston law firm founded by the great-grandfather of Bush-family adviser James Baker III, had given the Owen campaign $20,450. The firm also happened to be Ford's appeals counsel, angling for a $1 million bonus if it could get the decision reversed. Which it did ?- with Owen's help.

So the skinny kid and his lawsuit were sent to a district court in Dallas, where the judge immediately granted Ford's motion to dismiss. The family appealed, and the Dallas appellate court didn't have the stomach to uphold the decision. On June 29, 2001, it issued an opinion that almost guaranteed Willie's family the money needed to care for him. But it was too late. Willie, now 21, was surviving on a system of family and volunteer caretakers his mother patched together to work with the night nurse covered by her health plan. On July 3, 2001, the system unraveled. The night nurse left at 4 a.m. When Willie's mother walked into his bedroom at 5 a.m., she realized the ventilator wasn't working. No one had been there to restart it. Willie was dead.

During the Judiciary Committee's hearing, Feinstein asked Owen why she took so long when the boy's life was at risk.

"He did not pass away while the case was pending in my court," Owen said.

When Bush resubmitted Owen's appointment, Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, a friend of Feinstein, began lobbying the Senate Sisterhood. For a while Landrieu and Feinstein, who has more seniority and more muscle than the Louisiana senator, were wavering on the filibuster. They finally signed on. Maybe Feinstein's commitment to reasonable federal judges is stronger than her friendship with Hutchison. Or maybe a second look at the seven years Willie Searcy spent waiting for justice in Texas convinced her that the public interest is best served if Priscilla Owen remains home in Austin.

Now, it looks like the Bush Brain Trust may try to end the filibuster that keeps Owen's future up in the air. It works like this: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist attempts to gradually lower from 60 to 51 the votes needed to end a filibuster. That fails, because it requires 60 votes to change a Senate rule and the Republicans have only 50. Then Vice President Cheney rules on a constitutional point of order that 51 votes can end a filibuster of nominations. The Senate parliamentarian, appointed by Republicans, upholds his ruling. The filibuster blocking Priscilla Owen is ended. (And the road is cleared for the right-wing Supreme Court justices Bush will appoint later in his first term.) It would be quite an end to a Senate procedure in effect since George Washington held office.

(Lou Dubose is the co-author of Boy Genius: Karl Rove, The Brains Behind the Remarkable Political Triumph of George W. Bush and wrote, with Molly Ivins, Shrub: The Short but Happy Political Life of George W. Bush.)

LA Weekly
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,919 • Replies: 20
No top replies

 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 07:35 am
PDiddie,

Thanks for posting this story. Oh, what a twisted web is woven here. I will read it again and come back to comment.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 07:45 am
PDiddie
About par for the course. Dead men tell no tales. That's why responsible people have to tell it for them.
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 08:10 am
God, Higher Power, Morality, ie however we see it, please forgive me; other PUP members, please forgive me; my own conscience, please forgive me; but, my first response was that maybe the 3rd plane on 9/11/01 should have crashed in D.C. after all Embarrassed ...
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 09:53 am
You have a right to your opinion, sc.
It far outranks the most hideous statements I've read in this community.
In my opinion.
I hope when you think of the reality of that statement, you think better of it.

---------------

How could one prove seat belt failure? I can imagine a crash so violent that a seat belt would snap, not that I have any information this was the case. I just wonder how the case was proven.

As tragic as this story is, people are maimed and killed every day. Manufacturers can't shell out 40 mil to all of them. Was it proven Ford was negligent ? (This is not an endorsement of Owen-- Don't know enough about her, yet.)
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 10:48 am
Is money or life what is important? My father in law had collapsed lungs. As a veteran of WWII he supposedly had VA benefits. He did only to a certain extent. At first the Drs. wheeled him out into the hallway, then told his wife to take him home and make him as comfortable as possible. A city detective related to the man insisted they wheel him back in and save his life. They did and he survived another 5 yrs. During that time he had an oxygen bottle. The VA said, at last, "Do you know how expensive that oxygen is?" They put this man with virtually no lungs on a treadmill and then took away his oxygen. Of course we got him more at our own expense, but, after he had been more or less informed the money was more important than his right to breathe, he developed pneumonia right away and died. The system has got to be regulated to allow a person to live.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 11:16 am
Another horrible VA story, and I believe every word of it.

'Money or life' is a little simplistic, to me. The VA story wasn't similar, in my opinion. The VA owed your FIL. There is a question whether or not Ford was responsible for the boy's injuries. My concern with the story about the poor child, is the justice of making Ford liable. It seems that some are of the feeling that the "big corporation should pay", whether or not they are justifiably wrong. Can they foot the extraordinary bills for everyone who dies in one of their vehicles? Certainly not.

Protecting business, to me, is a vitally important interest to this nation. 40 mil is alot of money for one accident. Business generates livelihoods for our citizens. Protect them in their neglegence? No. Throw all the financial responsibility to them, when our emotions side with injured people? No.

There doesn't seem to be an easy answer. People die. They suffer. Sometimes, no one is to blame.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jun, 2003 11:18 am
The corporation was found liable by a jury.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:50 am
Sophia: read the story again, Ford didn't appeal as a refutation of the facts of the decision *(On whether the seat belt failed ) they just wanted the damages reduced. The punitive damages were thrown out,( doubtless Ford was not reckless, etc.) but the 30 million was still due to the kid for his care. In a case like this, where the care of a victim is dependant on the payment of damages, justice ought to be swift. This was the kind of callous disregard for life that is unexpected from a pro-life jurist like Prissy Owen.


Here's what will happen next, it may have happened already I don't know, the parents (stepfather and mother) will file a wrongful death suit against Ford. Unless they have new evidence, it's likely that Ford will offer to settle for between 1 and 2 million, that sounds like a lot, but the parents have probably got a 1 million dollar bill from their law firm and it's likely they spent or borrowed a million just for the child's initial care. Ford's expenses are in the 3 to 4 million just to defend the case, but if the parents settle for 3 million that's still a 90 percent reduction of cost to Ford.
*(On whether the seat belt failed: it did according to the evidence. Both were wearing seat belts, the stepfather wasn't injured. The science of forensics has advanced in the past few years to be able to find all kinds of data from crashs. That's how they are solving the shuttle failure.
*
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 04:07 pm
Yep, Joe.

I didn't know what Owen actually did to merit yet another negative campaign. I was trying to find her culpability. And, I went off for a sec on Ford. I was trying to process the entire scenario objectively. Before commenting further, I should go off into cyberspace and read a few differing retellings of the case against her.

I shall.
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 04:15 pm
Sofia addressed me with:

"You have a right to your opinion, sc.
It far outranks the most hideous statements I've read in this community.
In my opinion.
I hope when you think of the reality of that statement, you think better of it. "


Embarrassed of course you're correct . . . I apologize . . . I shouldn't have shared my evil impulse . . . my bad . . . Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 04:34 pm
<didn't feel you owed anyone an apology. was just hoping you didn't mean it... possibly, I should have kept my thought to myself...>

<hoping to shake self-imposed need to clarify everything soon>

Embarrassed , too.
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 04:41 pm
Sofia, please don't "beat yourself up". I think it's great that with such give-and-take we can learn to understand each other and better communicate on A2K. Actually, I quite enjoyed the fact that you apparently turned out to be my conscience - very impressed indeed! :wink:
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:35 pm
Yeah I agree with both of you, sweet and Sofe.

Don't second-guess and don't self-censure.

That's what the rest of are here for: to call you on your b.s.

Don't be afraid to be occasionally politically incorrect.
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:47 pm
ok, real quick, impulse to say

I have a crush on PDiddie

Cool
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:51 pm
There are threads for crushes, sweetie...

I gotta say you're my favorite, too, right now... Embarrassed

(...but then I've always liked Jewish girls...)
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:56 pm
Oh, loosen up, PDiddie honey, almost no thread where I've posted thus far remains on-topic; now back to your appreciation of my ethnicity (ahem) . . . my appreciation of your mind is what got me; I mean, you're so intelligent and funny which are two of the best aphrodisiacs . . . :wink: Cool
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 05:58 pm
Is it getting hot in here, or is it just me?... :wink:
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 06:00 pm
Oh, it's definitely you that is the hottie.

I note you are a "seasoned" member - does that mean you're tasty? How so?

:wink:
0 Replies
 
sweetcomplication
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jun, 2003 07:12 pm
Mr. PDiddie, get back here right now and tell me if you're tasty.

Oh, well, guess he's taking a cold shower; after all, if you can't stand the heat ... and all that Razz Twisted Evil :wink: ...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Slow and Fatal Justice: Priscilla Owens
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 05:34:33