1
   

JustanObserver has passed the New York Bar Exam!!!!

 
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 12:01 pm
Bloody well done, Justan!

I bet you are knackered now, after all that work and worry.

How to celebrate? Well, being English, I WAS going to go for the wig option on the poll, but after careful consideration, I think that you should become a judge as soon as possible, and give someone an honourable discharge at least once a day.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 12:09 pm
ffydownunder wrote:
I start at law school in 4 weeks ...


STOP! ... Save yourself while you still can!
0 Replies
 
ffydownunder
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Dec, 2006 06:49 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
ffydownunder wrote:
I start at law school in 4 weeks ...


STOP! ... Save yourself while you still can!



it's too late.... I've paid all my fees already!!!!! hehehehe
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 04:56 am
Well, in a few years, ffy, I bet we'll be having a similar celebration for you. Smile
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 12:33 pm
NickFun wrote:
Why has JustanObserver not responded to this thread? Are there certain legals issues responding here would present? Now that's he's a "lawyer" is he too good for us? Is he afraid of being sued???


While all of us should be afraid of being sued, I do have to apologize for my sparse presence.

I just moved into a tiny apartment with no internet, and the only internet I have is at work. So my surfing time is kept to a minimum. Just enough time for e-mail and work related searching.

In a few months I should have enough to get some broadband action going, though Very Happy
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 01:34 am
A "tiny apartment" in NYC is still at least $1500 per month. Surely you can spring for the $40 for the internet -- or steal someones.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 02:23 am
NickFun wrote:
Surely you can spring for the $40 for the internet -- or steal someones.


I hope, Justan isn't so long in his profession to cover private life with his profession's attitudes :wink:
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 02:33 am
I dunno, $40. matters to a variety of us, having to do with groceries, and I presume if he is trying to afford a small place, it can be a problem.
He'll be fine once he gets going.
0 Replies
 
Maries
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Jan, 2007 02:37 am
Simpson Hikes Pay; First-Years Go to $160,000
Anthony Lin
New York Law Journal
January 23, 2007

Printer-friendly Email this Article Reprints & Permissions

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has raised associate base salaries, with first-years now set to earn $160,000 before bonus.

The New York firm's move, announced internally Monday, comes less than a year after an earlier round of salary increases boosted first-year salaries in the city to $145,000 from the $125,000 that had been standard for several years prior.

Philip T. Ruegger, the chairman of Simpson Thacher's executive committee, said in an interview Monday that the firm had made its decision in light of the firm's strong overall performance in the past year.

"We're happy to pay our associates a little more because of that," said Ruegger. "We have great people and we just want to show that we appreciate them. We want to keep them here and happy."

Ruegger said the decision to increase salaries would not impact year-end bonuses, which he said would be separately determined later in the year. Last month, Simpson and other major firms announced bonuses starting at $30,000 for first-years.

Likewise, Simpson Thacher's salary increase is almost certain to be matched by other law firms. In the past, those other firms might chiefly have been elite New York firms like Sullivan & Cromwell or Davis Polk & Wardwell. But the many out-of-town firms that have expanded into the New York market in recent years have shown a willingness to match the latest salary moves, at least at the junior levels.

Indeed, Simpson Thacher's move could be calculated to ensure New York remains the top market in terms of associate pay. In recent weeks, a number of firms had also raised California first-year salaries to $145,000 from $135,000.

Firms feel enormous pressure to match each other in junior associate pay because they are all trying to compete for the same pool of top law school students. Salary scales diverge more at senior levels, and a smaller number of firms will seek to match Simpson Thacher's new top salary for senior associates of $290,000.

Top corporate firms like Simpson have had significant issues with retention of mid-level and senior associates who are often attractive hires for investment banks and other financial firms that pay even more.

Simpson Thacher's salary increase will surprise many in the legal community because it comes so soon after the new $145,000 standard was set. That increase was first announced by Sullivan & Cromwell last February. At that time, the starting salary had been $125,000 in New York for over five years.

But the $125,000 salary also came at the end of a flurry of late '90s pay increases, largely driven by competition from West Coast technology-focused firms.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 03:42:05