Quote: I will be glad to answer any specifics you propose. So tell us, what critter lives in a place that 'only evolution can explain' ?
mY SPECIFIC QUESTION Was , WHAT IS IT ABOUT BIOGEOGRAPHY THAT crEATIONISM EXPLAINS OR EVIDENCES? yOU ARE AVOIDING THE QUESTION totally dONT ANSWER only the question you wish but that which has been asked, this isnt a trial but we are asking specidfic questions and youre only dodging about
Quote:What nonsense. Why do you think I posted a link to the entire 8 page article and a summary if you think I was trying to hide the author's conclusion?
But you only quoted the bits that you wished all to see. I guess you know by now that many people will read the articles and many wont.
Quote:He proposes a dead end, a self generating 'proto-cell' with NO means of replication.When the first member of a 'new species' is born, what will he breed with? Or if he can still breed with the 'old species' then he is not a 'new species', is he?
we comprehend differently. Lke winning a lottery, someone always does and the biological brick wall is line"
aklways surmounted, except in your mind.
Quote:If this can replicate itself, then it is not what Shapiro was describing, is it?
The issue i9s moot , it happens and its not irreducibly complex. Theres no evidence to support that conclusion.
I answered that sufficiently that others got it and you tried to miscast what I said. We dont have any examples of a single species that was born and then never made it. The fossil record is replete with only the tons of fossils of species that (as I explained) were statistically variable and "probably" were isolated from others.
In todays speciation examples (galapogos finches of the 20th century, mutated corn smut bacteria etc) we see the production of myriads of variants many of which carry the same sets of variation, so theres really no single new variant that crosses this line .
Even if you were correct and could show us evidence of the single variant theory, wed see that such variants would occur and radiate out from an area of origin no? So then were back to biogeography.