Evolution isnt a phenom that has a "proof". It rests on the available evidence to deduce that it, as an explanation offers so much more than anything else.
Quote:herefor just as I can not prove creation, you can not prove evolution.
. Its worse than that, you cannot provide even a spoonful of evidence(scientific evidence) that supports the conclusion that Creation is at work. Thats the difference between the two.
Because of the evidence from the Fossil record, genetics, the age of theearth, biogeography, and the relationships among genomes of homologous animals separated by distance, stir in the evidence that hundreds of years of selective breeding in animals reveals that these animals diverge to the point where they dont "return" to a parental type anymore because the STR genes have diverged significantly . IF RL has chickened out, then you explain how a system of evidence or data supports Creation when the subject of biogeographic distribution of organisms is discussed?