Don't tell me there's no proof for evolution

OK, I'd have understood if you'd said the process of sexual reproduction instead of the act.

Yea. I don't get it. ID can't be tested, and nor can anyone produce evidence for the creator. Besides all that, homo sapiens are a rather young species on this planet. Most of us see it as the result of evolution. Nobody has been able to produce evidence to the contrary.

You have that backwards. Homo Sapiens or predecessors lost their fur while all of them still lived in Africa, when they stopped climbing trees in the forest and moved into the hot African grasslands. The Homo Sapiens started becoming somewhat hairier when they moved out of Africa up North, thereby demonstrating that your hairy ideas prove the opposite of what you think they do.

Your timing is off. Australopithecus might have made a tasty meal for the local predators, but by the time Homo Sapiens came on the scene the genus Homo was at or very near the top of the food chain. Half a million years ago Homo was already using razor sharp stone tips for his spears, which changes the power equation between Man and Beast very much in Man's favor. Fact is, predators were figuring out that they were better off leaving us alone.

We weren't a prey animal, by the time we became Homo Sapien we were top of the heap. Even now, people in undeveloped parts of the world seek out any predators that kill or attack a human and kill it with their sharp spears. Which means the only predators left now and probably for hundreds of thousands of years mostly figured out to steer clear when THEY smelled US. The genus Homo, and probably Australopithecus as well, devoted their energies to getting larger brains capable of devising more deadly hunting weapons. It turned out to be a much better survival strategy than wasting precious resources on keeping their sense of smell sharp.

probably Australopithecus as well, devoted their energies to getting larger brains capable of devising more deadly hunting weapons.

You have that backwards. Homo Sapiens or predecessors lost their fur while all of them still lived in Africa, when they stopped climbing trees in the forest and moved into the hot African grasslands. The Homo Sapiens started becoming somewhat hairier when they moved out of Africa up North, thereby demonstrating that your hairy ideas prove the opposite of what you think they do.

What you just said is a weird change in the species, loosing characteristics and recovering them after a while.

You must show that such kind of change is genetically possible.

as far as I can see, it's a great imaginary description of yours but is far away of a possible change in species.

When humans don't take baths or shower for weeks, stink worst than most of the species. Dogs, mules, rats, rabbits, lions, etc have shown a "limit" of stinking when their bodies are not in contact with water for weeks and months; however, humans "limit" of stinking in the wild will cause many predators to look somewhere else.....

....But humans, before protecting themselves in houses and later on in cities, one of their "natural" protection was their body smell.

The genus Homo, and probably Australopithecus as well, devoted their energies to getting larger brains capable of devising more deadly hunting weapons. It turned out to be a much better survival strategy than wasting precious resources on keeping their sense of smell sharp.

You are implying that humans helped themselves to obtain bigger brains.
Such is a nuts idea.

1 The clavicle in non -avian theropod dinosaurs

2 Limb musculature in primates

3 Regaining "coiling" of specific species of gastropods

4Wings on stick bugs

How many ways can you be wrong? No change of species was involved at all. The evidence strongly indicates Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa from previous species of Homo, somewhere along the journey the line shed their heavy fur and became much more lightly furred over their body-so lightly furred that it looks almost without hair entirely in many spots.

Hair is all over your body, but when it's so light and fine that it's barely visible it is called vellus hair. So, Homo Sapien in Africa was without heavy fur over most of his body, (whether he lost it or it was lost by a previous hominid in his evolutionary history is not germane to this discussion)

and then some Homo Sapiens moved out of Africa. The local climate conditions were different in the places those Homo Sapiens moved to, so when in the cold the texture of the vellus hair became thicker and the places where hair became visible and abundant got bigger.

All this time, he remained Homo Sapien, just like his fellow Sapiens who decided to stay in Africa. Trying to make this seem like some sort of miraculous transformation hitherto unobserved in biology is an indication of just how low you are in ammunition trying to shoot down the Out-Of-Africa Theory.

Brainpower takes energy. An ounce of brain consumes several times the calories of an ounce of muscle. Therefore, those creatures whose methods of obtaining food rely on sophisticated strategies and even tool use will eventually produce offspring with larger brains, since the smart ones of that species will obtain more food and therefore have enough health and energy to produce more offspring. Therefore, in a certain sense, each creature, by trial and error, does choose to determine their brain development by relying on food-obtaining strategies which emphasize brainpower over muscle, and the offspring further refine and change that brawn/speed/brainpower combo as the generations continue.

Humans were one of the creatures that came across the discovery that by working together to hunt, talking and communicating with each other as to the latest weaponry and tools, they could go a lot further than just having the physically strongest get all the mates. The human leader in the hunger gatherer society is not necessarily the physically largest, although it is notable that even in advanced societies, physical size corresponds to our idea of leadership. Unsurprisingly, this is subject to change if the small candidate seems to have a lot more upstairs than the large candidate.

Obviously, you lack a lot of what is termed recently "upstair"! In other words, you have doodoo for brains!

Excuse me, no? but pardon me... you just posted a "change" in human's "fur".

Excuse me again, no? but pardon me... the change you are implying in Homo sapiens is indeed worthy to be on the table in this discussion. You are saying that it's a change, you say that the fur was lost at one moment.

It wasn't necessary to respond the other group of sentences about the "power of stink" for survival, because my answer to your message can be resumed to a simple request.

You can pick up your teeth up off the floor now, the argument is over.