1
   

Molly Ivins: Thanks - No, Seriously

 
 
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 08:54 am
Thanks - No, Seriously
By Molly Ivins
Wednesday 22 November 2006
Austin, Texas

It's time to give thanks, and I want to start off with a great, big thank you for the top American movement conservatives and all the fun we've had since Election Day. I know I promised not to gloat after this election was over, but I'm not talking unseemly gloating - I'm talking about moments so brilliantly hilarious the only option is to put your head down on the desk and howl.

First in line is the wit of The National Review's Kate O'Beirne, who clearly teamed up with Borat to explain the great conservative win. Her explanation is that this is a win for conservatism because a great many of the D's elected are so conservative themselves. She says half of them are conservatives.

She is indeed right. If only twice as many Democrats had been elected, it would have proved that there are twice as many conservatives in the country, and this is clear to any thinking person. We might challenge Ms. O'Beirne to explain how the next Republican win is a victory for liberalism.

The reason that O'Beirne and others are able to accept such an absurdity is because they've been listening to George W. Bush for six years and are thus able to believe six impossible things before breakfast.

Speaking of "thinking," another great moment for conservatives this year was highlighted on the Nov. 16 edition of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show." Host Jon Stewart addressed a recent remark that CNN Headline News host Glenn Beck made to Rep.-elect Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), the first Muslim ever elected to Congress.

Beck said, "I have been nervous about this interview with you because what I feel like saying is, 'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies.' " After airing Beck's comment, Stewart declared, "Finally, a guy who says what people who aren't thinking are thinking."

While the Washington press corps worried its pretty little head to a frazzle over Nancy Pelosi's Armani suits and terrible start as speaker of the House (except she hasn't started as speaker), they forgot to fret over Trent Lott, who had previously been bounced unceremoniously from the Senate leadership team to which the Republicans just reelected him. They seem to have forgotten that he had expressed the wish that Strom Thurmond, the segregationist candidate for president, had won in 1948.

Thanks for the late Johnny Apple and the now retired Adam Clymer (who predicted a 28-seat sweep and the possibility of taking the Senate) for reminding us that The New York Times used to know how to cover politics. So, for that matter, did The Washington Post, now graced only by E.J. Dionne.

Thanks for Cokie Roberts, who was the only alert citizen on television on election night. The others were either stalwart Republicans or John McCain worshipers.

Thanks from a grateful nation for an obedient press corps that failed during Bush's six-hour, carefully orchestrated visit to Indonesia to register the fact that there were massive demonstrations against his administration and its policies toward Muslims. The demonstrators during his short visit forced him to stay behind the presidential palace wall all day and - due to concerns for his safety - not spend the night.

So many of our media mavens have been so wrong for so long that we may yet see a mere modicum of becoming self-doubt from our professional pontificators. And think how thankful we'd all be for that. Their sources, led by Karl Rove, have had them eating Pablum out of their hands for years now.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 470 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:14 am
Oh Lordy, I forgot about Molly Ivins, she was relatively quiet during the R's takeover of Congress, the first time in 40 years. With the exceptipon of her coining the term shrub to describe GW, she hasn't had a lot of anything to say, thank gawd.
She is a foul mouthed, corn pone speakin angry old broad.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:26 am
Molly's had plenty to say, Lsm. You just haven't been listening.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:29 am
Swimpy wrote:
Molly's had plenty to say, Lsm. You just haven't been listening.


Nothing of import.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:30 am
Madam
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Oh Lordy, I forgot about Molly Ivins, she was relatively quiet during the R's takeover of Congress, the first time in 40 years. With the exceptipon of her coining the term shrub to describe GW, she hasn't had a lot of anything to say, thank gawd.
She is a foul mouthed, corn pone speakin angry old broad.


I think you've mistaken sweet, beloved Molly Ivins with that foul mouthed, corn pone speakin angry old broad, Ann Coulter.

BBB Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:43 am
Swimpy wrote:
Molly's had plenty to say, Lsm. You just haven't been listening.


Like I said, you haven't been listening.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:43 am
Re: Madam
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Oh Lordy, I forgot about Molly Ivins, she was relatively quiet during the R's takeover of Congress, the first time in 40 years. With the exceptipon of her coining the term shrub to describe GW, she hasn't had a lot of anything to say, thank gawd.
She is a foul mouthed, corn pone speakin angry old broad.


I think you've mistaken sweet, beloved Molly Ivins with that foul mouthed, corn pone speakin angry old broad, Ann Coulter.

BBB Rolling Eyes


Nope, Ann Coulter is a young lady, long blond hair, well spoken, (even though she is a bit strong on some things) Molly is an old woman that was joined at the hip to Ma Richards for years. They were old drinkin buddies.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:44 am
Swimpy wrote:
Swimpy wrote:
Molly's had plenty to say, Lsm. You just haven't been listening.


Like I said, you haven't been listening.

I should've said nothing of import TO ME Sorry.
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:49 am
THAT'S more like it. It's refressing to hear someone admit that great minds don't always think alike Wink
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Nov, 2006 09:51 am
Swimpy wrote:
THAT'S more like it. It's refressing to hear someone admit that great minds don't always think alike Wink

lol Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Molly Ivins: Thanks - No, Seriously
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 02:44:02