1
   

US: Iran may have germ weapons

 
 
Reply Mon 20 Nov, 2006 05:59 pm
Iran probably has germ weapons, possibly N.Korea-US
20 Nov 2006 14:50:08 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Richard Waddington

GENEVA, Nov 20 (Reuters) - Iran probably has germ warfare weapons, North Korea may have developed them and Syria could have carried out research into such banned weapons, the United States told an arms conference on Monday.

Addressing the opening session of the sixth review conference of the Convention on Biological Weapons (BWC), U.S. delegation head John C. Rood said those countries were of particular concern given their "support for terrorism".

"We believe that Iran probably has an offensive biological weapons programme in violation of the BWC," Rood said. "We also believe North Korea has a biological weapons capability and may have developed, produced and weaponised for use.

"Finally, we remain seriously concerned that Syria ... has conducted research and development for an offensive BW programme," he said.

Both Iran and North Korea are members of the 31-year-old BWC, which Syria has signed but not ratified. There was no immediate comment from any of the three states, but in the past they have firmly rejected such allegations.

The conference, held every five years, will review the working of the 155-state treaty which prohibits the development, production and stockpiling of biological and toxin weapons, and will seek to agree a programme of future work.

Rood, assistant secretary at the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, declined to detail his accusations against the three states. He referred journalists to the Aug. 2005 report by the United States on various countries' compliance with the BWC.

The United States has in the past accused other countries, including Russia and China, of not fully abiding by the treaty.

GROWING THREAT

Opening the three-week conference, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan called for stronger efforts to protect the world against biological weapons, which he said posed a growing threat due to advances in science and technology.

Awareness of the dangers had been heightened by the global concern with terrorism and with new highly infectious natural diseases such as bird flu which had underlined the ability of viruses to kill, he said.

The time had come to "take further steps to ensure that the Convention will continue to serve as an effective barrier against biological weapons," Annan said.

"The horror of biological weapons is shared by all," Annan said, urging the states party to the BWC treaty to overcome their differences and boost the pact's effectiveness. But years of negotiation on a new protocol to strengthen the treaty ended in failure in 2001 because the United States opposed measures such as spot checks on laboratories.

Washington had long been sceptical about the chances of putting in place an effective system of verification of compliance with the treaty and said spot checks could just encourage industrial espionage.

But states agreed to work on improving cooperation in areas such as disease surveillance, the strengthening of national legislation against germ weapons and tightening codes of conduct for scientists.

In the coming five-year period, Rood said the United States wanted enforcement of national laws to be addressed to ensure that non-state actors seeking such weapons were caught and punished.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 297 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Nov, 2006 06:32 pm
"This is an important step towards a rational re-evaluation of the U.S. biodefense boom," said Edward Hammond of the Austin, TX based Sunshine Project. "The U.S. government is investing billions of taxpayer dollars in biodefense related research, but has no coordinated plan and insufficient mechanisms to ensure transparency and treaty compliance."

In addition to expanded bioweapons efforts at the Department of Energy, an extensive expansion of similar research capabilities are being planned by the U.S. Army and the National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases. "These federal agencies are moving into our university systems, our symbols of free and creative thinking, and creating an environment of secrecy," said Dr. Sujatha Byravan, Executive Director of the Cambridge-based Council for Responsible Genetics. "This will have a terrible impact on the generations-old academic custom of openness that has been a driving force behind scientific development."

"The federal agencies pushing the bioweapons expansion are doing so while sacrificing basic public health needs," argues Mary Wulff of the Hamilton, MT Coalition for A Safe Lab. "Why don't they spend the billions of dollars on research that would truly benefit all humanity, such as AIDs or tuberculosis?"

"There is an overwhelming and immediate need for a comprehensive examination of the U.S. biodefense program and the direction that it's headed," said Dr. Robert Gould, President of the Washington, DC based Physicians for Social Responsibility. "The U.S. is treading on very dangerous ground and steps must be taken before irreparable harm is done."

The coalition has actively sought assurances from several universities across the nation, including Boston University, the University of Texas at Galveston, and the University of California at Davis, that no classified research would be conducted for the federal government at their facilities. The coalition has also been successful at increasing the level of public participation and public comment on a number of proposed biological research facilities, including those for Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories and Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana.


More information on this litigation can be found at either: http://www.nukewatch.org/ or http://www.trivalleycares.org/
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » US: Iran may have germ weapons
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2025 at 05:29:59