Foxfyre wrote:It is true that some believe what they have not experienced based on witnesses presenting evidence of their own experience. They cannot see the oxygen and hydrogen in water, for instance, but they believe it is there based on a cloud of witnesses testifying to the truth of that.
Ignorant nonsense. Learn a little chemistry, perform a simple electrolysis experiment, and there you have tangible, visible, measureable, reproducible, independently verifiable proof that water is composed of two volumes of hydrogen and one of oxygen ... no "witnesses" involved, unless you invite some freinds over to share the experience.
Quote:It is also true that those who have experienced God have a small and limited sense of who and what God is and they do believe. Some are persuaded of the existence of God based on a cloud of witnesses testifying to the truth of that.
And finally, I believe all willing to experience God will experience God, but that is something that each much experience for himself. I cannot transfer my experience to you.
"
Faith is believing in what you know isn't so"
Mark Twain
Anecdote, no matter how devoutly believed, no matter how sincerely presented, is evidence of nothing beyond belief. Religious faith expressly, explicitly, and inherently is a circumstance of belief, not just willingness to believe, but, more importantly, requiring active desire to believe. "In order to believe, one must have faith, in order to have faith, one must believe; without faith, one cannot believe, and without belief, one cannot have faith" - pardon me or not, but it just plain don't get no more circular - or sillier - than that, and that precisely is the proposition you, in comon with most religionists in these discussions, repeatedly, in fact all but invariably, present.
Science readily admits not all questions have answers, even that some questions may remain forever unanswerable. Beyond accepting that, science depends on it, derives from it, proceeds because of that. Science is about asking questions then discovering, verifying, demonstrating, and constantly refining answers to questions, whereas religion is about declaring The Answer, apart from and immune to question. Personally, I just can't buy the "Because I told you so" argument, which in the end is the only argument the religionist has.