Reply
Sat 21 Oct, 2006 11:26 am
It was in Utah, December 4th, 1988, college student, Brette Hiawatha, sat down to brush away the centuries old dirt from the Allosaurus breast bone. Not unlike Michaelangelo, creating his David, Brette's tools artfully worked, until, incredibly, something appeared in the rock along with the dinosaur fossil. It was two bag-like impressions, Dolly Parton-sized breast shapes. It took ten years of further digging and cleaning before scientists could be certain of what had been found.
Wednesday, in the upcoming issue of Nature and Bone Magazine, it will be revealed that Brette Hiawatha has discovered the first proof that dinosaurs had humongous gazongas and for that reason, it is taken as proof positive they nursed their young. - Doug Farouk, Mg. Ed., Nature and Bone Magazine
Actual pic from Nature and Bone Magazine
I ought to have been a scientist.
What size cup did they wear? :wink:
Don't tell kicky about this.
He'll want to build a time machine and go back there.
What's the most humongous size?
more like Nature and Boner Magazine...
They don't appear to have found evidence of a bra on the site.
Far from being evidence of nursing young, I think the breasts served as a weapon in individual combat. Clearly, those tits can swing further and more heavily than the dinos arms, and the width and length of the tail acts as a sort of counterweight to help her swing her mammae at her opponent.
littlek wrote:Where's her bellybutton?
No bellybutton--they hatch from eggs.
Those tits are actually silicoln implants. I can spot them a mile away. Dinos were more advanced than we thought!
I googled "Dinosaurs with tits " and nothing came up that matched my search criteria.
Setanta wrote:littlek wrote:Where's her bellybutton?
No bellybutton--they hatch from eggs.
uuuuhuh. But, this mammey thing throws a new light on old conceptions. If they had mameries, the bore needy young, not fully capable tiny dinosaurs. The eggs provide all the sustenance that they need to survuive until they can hunt for food for themselves. So, the boobies must mean that dinos bore live young and therefor those young should have bellybuttons. Come on, Boss, get with it!
Im not on board with this. I think Edgar's as tanked as kicky.
Perhaps dinosaurs are related to the monotremes.
That would really blur the distinction between reptile and mammal. I would be very surprised. I prefer the silicon theory.
That would really blur the distinction between reptile and mammal. I would be very surprised. I prefer the silicon theory.
Edgar - is Gungasnake holding a gun to your head? Give us a sign and we'll rescue you.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace