Setanta wrote:Anyone who wants to go to the thread which Monte Cargo mentioned, and look at the series of exchanges in which he and i indulged (i'm assuming Monte Cargo is a he, as Littlebitty has described that member as her husband), it will quickly become apparent that Monte Cargo lashed out at me based upon his political point of view. It will be evident to anyone reading there that i had not at any time "flamed" him before he launched his attack on me. I was not even aware of his existence. His complaint is nothing less than pure hypocracy.
Why all the fuss and excitement? A little bit of spirited and lively debate always includes a few jabs to the party of opposition. Come on and admit it, Setanta, you like to stir the pot...You're still calling LoneStarMadame the Madame of the Whorehouse.
Quote:He is piling up excuses for his behavior, and also advances the "white knight" defense, suggesting that he was riding to the defense of the Madame of the Lone Star Whorehouse. That new member has lashed out at and ridiculed other members here who disagree with her since she showed up, and has been posting at twice the daily rate as my own, even though i have racked up more than 30,000 posts. If she keeps that pace up, in two years she'll have more posts than any other member here. Her posts have consistently contained attacks on other members here, and her only apparent criterion is that said members have a different political viewpoint than hers.
Remember the Bush doctrine; "You're either with us or you're against us." LoneStar is an unpstanding conservative. You attacked one of us so you're against us.
But how bad is it? So I accused you of voting for Clinton. It's no big deal. When I was in music school, my buddies used to accuse me of listening to Peter Frampton. Well, it's not exactly the same, but as an analogy, it will do.
Quote:Monte Cargo brought her up, so i make no apology for having mentioned her. Monte Cargo's attempt to defend himself on a claim that, one, he was being flamed and was responding in like kind, and, two, that he was defending the helpless and abused belle LoneStarMadam, is transparent bullshit.
Roll your eyes again, Big Bird.
That's more of the spirt, Setenta.
Buddy, so much of the debate game is a front. If you post on this board, you are already intelligent enough to know this. Consider this:
What fun would the board be if the board was nothing but a bunch of yucksters who all thought and talked alike. It would be completely boring and unchallenging, and everyone might as well be on valium.
So I think you said you voted for Ralph Nader.
You're not so small that you can't stand a little of the same **** that you dish out to others, and here you are, right inside your very complaint that people are taunting and teasing you, calling LoneStarMadame from the Whorehouse. You make a half a Benjamin Franklin, that kind of teasing should roll off with ease.
You also read the post where Little Bitty disclosed that I am her husband, yet you referred to me as a she. It would really make your complaints look even more pathetic if I were a woman, so let's get into the pits and scrap, okay?
Jealous?