1
   

US holds AP photographer for months without charges

 
 
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 04:26 pm
The photographer began his work in September 2004 (before the main Fallujah offensive in November and December that year), and took pictures in Fallujah and Ramadi. Of course, photographers, humanitarian aid, etc. was blocked during and immediately after the Nov. 7 2004 action. And for good reason. It was necessary to damper as much reporting on the damage Fallujah sustained as possible -- to sum it up, over a third of the city was destroyed, with about 800 civilian deaths, most of the city's population of 300,000 fleeing.

Quote:
US holds AP photographer for months without charges

By Robert Tanner, Associated Press | September 18, 2006

NEW YORK -- The US military in Iraq has imprisoned an Associated Press photographer for five months, accusing him of being a security threat but never filing charges or permitting a public hearing.

Military officials said Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen, was being held for ``imperative reasons of security" under United Nations resolutions. AP executives said that the news cooperative's review of Hussein's work did not find anything to indicate inappropriate contact with insurgents, and that any evidence against him should be brought to the Iraqi criminal justice system.

Hussein, 35, is a native of Fallujah who began work for the AP in September 2004. He photographed events in Fallujah and Ramadi until he was detained on April 12 of this year.

``We want the rule of law to prevail. He either needs to be charged or released," said Tom Curley, AP's president and chief executive officer. ``We've come to the conclusion that this is unacceptable under Iraqi law, or Geneva Conventions, or any military procedure."

The AP has worked quietly for Hussein's release until now, believing that would be the best approach. But with the US military giving no indication it would change its stance, the news cooperative has decided to make public Hussein's imprisonment, hoping the spotlight will bring attention to his case .

Hussein is one of an estimated 14,000 people detained by the US military worldwide -- 13,000 of them in Iraq. They are held in limbo where few are ever charged with a specific crime or given a chance before any court or tribunal to argue for their freedom.

In Hussein's case, the military has not provided any concrete evidence to back up the vague allegations they have raised about him, Curley and other AP executives said.

The military said Hussein was captured with two insurgents, including Hamid Hamad Motib, an alleged leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq. ``He has close relationships with persons known to be responsible for kidnappings, smuggling, improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and other attacks on coalition forces," according to a May 7 e-mail from US Army Major General Jack Gardner, who oversees all coalition detainees in Iraq.

``The information available establishes that he has relationships with insurgents and is afforded access to insurgent activities outside the normal scope afforded to journalists conducting legitimate activities," Gardner wrote to AP international editor John Daniszewski.

Hussein proclaims his innocence, according to his Iraqi lawyer, Badie Arief Izzat, and believes he has been targeted because his photos from Ramadi and Fallujah were deemed unwelcome by the coalition forces.

AP
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 542 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 04:46 pm
I remember the olden days when the United States believed in such antiquated things as "due process" and the right to a "speedy trial". Isn't it great that we've grown past those silly times and we no longer have to rely on that old relic called "The US Constitution"?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 12:50 am
NickFun wrote:
I remember the olden days when the United States believed in such antiquated things as "due process" and the right to a "speedy trial". Isn't it great that we've grown past those silly times and we no longer have to rely on that old relic called "The US Constitution"?


I didn't realize Iraqi citizens in Iraq were protected by the US CONSTITUTION. Care to point out were our laws here are provided to their citizens there? I get it, you are trying to stir the pot and make **** up.
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 10:36 am
Hey Baldi! I suppose Constitutional protection does not apply in countries which we are simply occupying and killing their citizenry. I guess you're right. These people derserve whatever sort of pain and torture we give them. "Might makes Right".
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 10:41 am
Not using due process is, y'know, such a great way to show a country how democracy works.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 10:55 am
We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, except for anyone that isn't a citizen of the good ole USA or wasn't born there and spent at least 20 years living there. We wouldn't want to include naturalized citizens in that equality statement.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » US holds AP photographer for months without charges
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 02:08:47