1
   

911 Physics Scientist Banned From The Classroom

 
 
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 08:39 am
Banned From The Classroom 911 Physics Scientist Who Proved Thermite Involved In WTC Demolitions

By ChristopherBollyn
9-17-6

Like a modern-day Galileo or Socrates, the highly respected physicist, who has challenged with logic and scientific evidence the official explanation for the "collapse" of the World Trade Center, has been banned from teaching classes at his university.

On September 7, the third day of the new fall semester at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Provo, Utah, Steven E. Jones, professor of physics and 9/11 researcher, was suddenly banned by university authorities from teaching the physics classes he has taught for the past 21 years. Jones was unexpectedly suspended with pay after participating in a radio show in which he had been cunningly lured to comment on a subject outside of his field the "motivation" of "the Neo-Conservatives" blamed for the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

Jones, a soft-spoken physicist who specializes in metal-catalyzed fusion, archaeometry, and solar energy, joined the 9/11 research effort after being intrigued by the unexplained collapse of the 47-story WTC 7 at 5:25 p.m. on the afternoon of 9/11. Jones scientific interest was sparked after having read the August 2002 report in American Free Press that molten iron had been found in the rubble of all three collapsed WTC towers including WTC 7.

As this reporter discovered in the summer of 2002, "literally molten steel" had been found, more than a month after the collapse, at the bases of the collapsed towers, where their load-bearing central support columns connected to the bedrock. "Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed," I wrote at the time.

Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, told this reporter he had seen pools of "literally molten steel" at the World Trade Center, where his company had been contracted to remove debris, weeks after the three towers collapsed.

Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland, wrote the clean-up plan for the WTC and confirmed the presence of molten metal at the site.

"Yes," Loizeaux said, "hot spots of molten steel in the basements." These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said.

The molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed," he said. Loizeaux also confirmed that molten iron had been found in the rubble of WTC 7, the tower owned by Larry Silverstein which was neither hit by an airplane nor severely damaged, but which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon of 9/11.

In 2005, Jones began investigating the collapse of WTC 7 and the large amounts of molten iron seen falling from the burning South Tower. These two subjects remain completely unexplained in the official literature on 9/11.

"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time," the FEMA-sponsored WTC Building Performance Study of 2002 concluded. "Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence," it said. The way that the building collapsed within its own footprint suggested that it was an "internal collapse," the report said.

The long awaited NIST report on the collapse of WTC 7 is supposed to be released next year.

BYU ANALYSIS OF MOLTEN METAL

The question of what caused the 47 load-bearing central columns of the twin towers to fall has been a fundamental question about the unexplained collapses of the WTC towers. The fire-induced collapse scenario does not explain why these crucial internal box columns would have failed.

Last summer, after obtaining pieces of the hardened molten fragments from the WTC, Jones and other scientists at BYU conducted extensive laboratory tests and found that the molten metal was primarily composed of iron with slight traces of structural steel. From the physical and photographic evidence Jones concluded that Thermite, or a similar aluminothermic process, was used to slice the central core columns and bring down the twin towers.

Jones, along with 2 other physicists and a geologist at BYU, conducted Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Electron Microprobe analyses on the samples.

The previously molten metal samples were predominately iron, with very little chromium, Jones said, along with uncommon chemical elements in abundance such as fluorine and manganese. Aluminum and sulfur were also present, which he said would be expected from thermate reactions. Thermate is Thermite, which is powdered aluminum and ferrous oxide, with 2 percent sulfur added to the mixture to increase the steel-cutting effectiveness of the reaction.

"The results," Jones says in a presentation he recently gave at Idaho State University, "coupled with visual evidence at the scene such as the flowing yellow-hot liquid metal still red after falling about 500 feet, provide compelling evidence that Thermite reaction compounds (aluminothermics) were used, meaning Thermite was deliberately placed in both WTC Towers and WTC 7."

See: http://worldtradecentertruth.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment.pdf

Jones' research papers are online at www.journalof911studies.com.

THE RADIO TRAP

On September 5, Doug Fabrizio, executive producer of RadioWest on the University of Utah's public radio station invited Jones to come on his one-hour program to discuss his 9/11 research.

Before Jones could even discuss his research, however, Fabrizio was aggressively quizzing him on the "Neo-Conservative motivation" for the attacks, and repeatedly pressed him to comment on a subject far outside his field and competence to explain who within the government could have been involved in the attacks if not 19 Arab hijackers with box cutters.

Because Jones is a physicist and is not engaged in the political background of "false flag" terrorism attacks, he reluctantly responded to Fabrizio's question by citing the author Webster Tarpley's analysis that individuals such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, who are linked to the "international banking cartel," have been named, by Tarpley, as possible suspects.

Jones was careful to say that these were not his ideas, but Tarpley's, and that these were possible suspects that Tarpley had named.
Jones is generally reluctant to discuss the political implications of his findings, and his comments about Wolfowitz and Perle on the radio program created quite a "buzz on campus," the Deseret Morning News reported.

After interviewing Jones for a brief 20 minutes, Fabrizio said goodbye to Jones and turned the remainder of the hour over to a discussion of conspiracy theories with two Jewish professors, a Robert Goldberg from the University of Utah and Gary Fine from Northwestern.

The first caller was a William Tumpowsky, chairman of the Jewish Community Relations Council and board member of the local Israeli-fund raising organization, the United Jewish Federation. Tumpowsky charged that Jones' was using code language to make anti-Semitic allegations. Goldberg supported this accusation.

Starting from this outrageous allegation, Fabrizio continued the hostile discussion with Goldberg and Fine, with frequent allegations that the now-absent physics professor was nothing more than an anti-Semite indulging in conspiracy fantasies. The most significant evidence brought forth by Jones' research was not even discussed.

Within two days, the authorities at BYU apparently caved to organized Jewish pressure and put Jones on paid leave. Students who had already begun their fall physics courses with Jones will be taught by other faculty members for the rest of the semester as university administrators review his statements and research.

Repeated calls to BYU spokeswoman Carri Jenkins about the banning of Jones from the classroom were not returned. Jenkins has not responded any of my questions left with BYU's communications office.

"I'm not sure we did it the right way," Fabrizio said after he accepted responsibility for the radio program that sparked the sacking of Jones.
Asked why he had pressed Jones to make a statement about who was behind the attacks, Fabrizio said, "I was interested in what motivated the science." This is, however, a less than honest answer because Jones has always stressed in his presentations that it is the unexplained collapse of WTC 7 and the presence of molten iron in the rubble that motivate his investigation.

The American Association of University Professors criticized BYU's decision to place Jones on paid leave for his comments on the radio program.

AAUP general secretary Roger Bowen called BYU's decision "distressing" and said Jones shouldn't be removed from teaching classes for statements made outside the classroom.

"Academic freedom also protects extramural utterances, that is, statements made by faculty outside the classroom when they speak as citizens," Bowen told the Deseret Morning News. "It's very clear there never should be official retribution for faculty who exercise their rights as citizens, with the very careful disclaimer they are not speaking on behalf of the university."

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education joined the criticism of the BYU decision against Jones.

"BYU is literally the example we use of a university that does not promise strong free speech or academic freedom protections," FIRE president Greg Lukianoff said.

Photo: Christopher Bollyn and Professor Steven E. Jones discussing the molten metal seen cascading from the 81st floor of WTC 2 and found under the rubble of all three "collapsed" towers of the World Trade Center. The bag in front of Bollyn contains samples taken from the molten metal found at the WTC site. These samples are primarily molten iron, the end product of the Thermite reaction along with aluminum oxide and tremendous heat release.

"The data doesn't lie," Jones said. "I have to speak the truth the best I know it as a scientist I feel the responsibility to speak out."

http://www.rense.com/general73/ZZIBN.HTM
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 350 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 08:41 am
Shouldn't this be in the humor forum?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 08:45 am
Yes, and Mr. Jones has also written a paper entitled: "Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America", in which he claims that Mayan images of deities show "crucifixion stigmata" on the hands and feet, to "prove" that the putative Jesus visited Central America, and that therefore, the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Joseph Smith, and his "revealed scripture," the Book of Mormon, are "scientifically accurate."

Yep, you're backin' a winner there . . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 08:47 am
By the way, Mr. Jones, once a prominent proponent of "cold fusion," has not stated that it is proven that the world trade center towers and building seven collapsed due to controlled demolition--he has only said he believes as much and has called for further investigation.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 10:35 am
While Jones may not be an idiot, through abusing his position - blatantly ignoring accepted scientific and academic research and review practice - to offer publicly an ill-founded, counter-factual, fantastic hypotheses not only beyond his area of competence but tinged with ignorance and prejudice, thereby aligning himself with the world community of 9/11 idiots, he's certainly made himself appear to be an idiot, and has made himself a hero to same.



Quote:
Double-checking 9/11 theory
Monday, September 18, 2006

BYU physics professor Steven Jones's theory on the World Trade Center's destruction has earned him a paid suspension from the university.

School officials suspended Jones over concerns that his paper on the subject has not been published in traditional, peer-reviewed scientific journals. His work is being reviewed by BYU's administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the Physics Department.

Jones made headlines when he said airliners could not have caused the World Trade Center's twin towers to collapse and knock down an adjacent building. The way the buildings fell -- almost straight down -- suggests to him that explosives were used to bring down the skyscrapers. Jones backs up his theory by citing the presence of molten metal in the buildings' wreckage, which suggests to him that thermite bombs were used because aviation fuel and office furnishings could never have burned hot enough to melt steel.

He has since backed away from a statement that government officials and international bankers were responsible for the attack, but he still maintains that bombs, not planes, destroyed the towers.

Jones's suspension has made him a martyr among 9/11 conspiracy theorists. To them, it is just more proof that the government is trying to keep people from learning the truth, and they have sent messages protesting the suspension to BYU.

If getting BYU to suspend Jones while conducting a review of his research is the government's way of putting a lid on him, it's not doing a very good job of it.

Jones's research is available on the Internet, and the professor recently presented his paper at Idaho State University. He has also published his views in the book "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out."

He is clearly not being muzzled, nor is his work being shoved down an Orwellian memory hole.

Rather, BYU acted to protect its academic reputation by holding Jones to the same standards that govern all scholarly research. One would expect any other university to take the same steps if one of its professors published a controversial paper without independent scholarly review and made politically inflammatory statements in the process. Independent review ensures that proper scientific procedures were followed and that others can get the same results.

While Jones is a physicist, he is not qualified to fully explain how two quarter-mile-high skyscrapers collapsed. While there is some physics involved in the events of 9/11, questions about what weakened the towers and the adjacent building are best left to engineers who fully understand how structures work.

Jones maintains that his paper had been peer-reviewed three times when it was published in the "Journal of 9/11 Studies," an online publication of 9/11-related research. The professor's work may well have been reviewed by scientists more qualified in engineering than he, but the 9/11 Web site is hardly a neutral party. It disputes the official version of the towers' collapse and openly suggests that the truth is being held back.

Someone advancing a theory that demolition charges were used to destroy the buildings is going to get a more friendly hearing from these "scholars" than someone who can prove the official version of events beyond reasonable doubt.

BYU is seeking disinterested parties who have expertise in structural engineering. These experts will look at Jones's findings from a strictly scientific point of view rather than through the filter of conspiracy theories. They will determine if Jones's version of events is plausible or if he has been irresponsible in his research, either by going beyond his expertise or ignoring facts that contradicted his hypothesis.

Jones's supporters should welcome the chance for this impartial review to give their position some legitimacy in academic and political circles. This process can vindicate Jones just as easily as it can debunk his claim.


Of course, making himself appear to be an idiot is for Jones not a venture into uncharted territory; as mentioned by Setanta, Jones has a working familiarity with the practice.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 911 Physics Scientist Banned From The Classroom
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/11/2025 at 06:22:17