1
   

The income tax is illegal

 
 
Reply Sun 17 Sep, 2006 03:07 pm
Here just a few of the reasons why the income tax as we know it is completely illegal. There is no law that requires anyone in the United States to pay a direct unaportioned tax on they're labor. The IRS is unlawfully imposing a tax on the american people that doesn't exist.


U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3

Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. The actual Enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the state of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4

No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

Note: The definition of a direct tax is a tax that cannot be avoided. An indirect tax is a tax that can be avoided

Note: This means that the Federal government cannot directly tax the wages of the American people. Any direct taxes must be apportioned or divided equally among the states which do have the authority to directly tax the people unless otherwise specified in that state's constitution

5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Note: When you file a 1040 form you are giving the government information that could be used to put you in prison if you lie or make a mistake. This violates you're right against self incrimination which is protected under the 5th amendment

Note: There is no law that requires you to file a 1040 even though the IRS insists that it's mandatory. The 5th Amendment protects you're right against self incrimination which means you don't have to give any information to the government because it can be used to incriminate you. Therefore any law that does require you to give any information to the government is unconstitutional The only information that you are required to give the government is you're name and address which is used in the census to determine voting districts

16th Amendment

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Note: The Definition of Income was given in the Eisner vs Montgomery case to mean gains or profits from corporate activity and not wages. The 16th Amendment only allows the government to tax the income of corporations and not individual wages

Note: The government already had the power to directly tax the income of corporations therefore the 16th Amendment granted the government no new powers of taxation

Note: The 16th Amendment was never properly ratified. This is documented extensively in the book The law that never was by Bill Benson


When President Ronald Reagan was elected he appointed the grace commission to research all of the various areas of the Federal Government and make a report. This was taken from the grace commission report

Grace Commission Report
Page 4 Paragraph 9

With two thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interests on the Federal Debt

Note: In other words the income tax does not pay for any public service that benefits the people and is thus unnecessary. As for paying off the interest on the Federal debt, The Federal Government created that debt when it set up the Federal Reserve in 1913. The Federal Reserve is a private bank which prints all U.S. currency directly out of thin air and then charges the government interest which is partially repaid with the money from the income tax. It is not possible to completely repay the debt to the Federal Reserve because it just keeps getting bigger and bigger every time they print more money. It is in reality a giant scam. It is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people by they're government. The only solution to solve this problem is to shut down the Federal Reserve. The government has the authority granted in the constitution to print money interest free. They do not however have the authority to give the power to print money to a private bank.

Note: It should also be mentioned here that both the graduated income tax and the Federal Reserve System are two of the ten planks of the communist manifesto. In fact if you read the communist manifesto then you will see that the U.S. has adopted all ten of the ten planks effectively making us a communist country


Here are the ten planks of the communist manifesto

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes fro the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need!

The United States is following the communist manifesto to the letter because it is a centralized system that gives the government control of every aspect of our lives


There is no law enacted by congress that allows the government to directly tax the wages of individual citizens

Please research the Internal Revenue Code which is under Title 26 of the U.S. Code


Here are some areas of the internal revenue code to specifically look at

Liability for withholding taxes as defined in the internal revenue code

U.S. Code TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 79 > § 7701 > Paragraph (a)16

§ 7701. Definitions

Withholding agent
The term "withholding agent" means any person required to deduct and withhold any tax under the provisions of section 1441, 1442, 1443, or 1461.

U.S. Code TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 3 > Subchapter B > § 1461

§ 1461. Liability for withheld tax

Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any payments made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

U.S. Code TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 3 > Subchapter A > § 1441

§ 1441. Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens

U.S. Code TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 3 > Subchapter A > § 1442

§ 1442. Withholding of tax on foreign corporations

U.S. Code TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 3 > Subchapter A > § 1443

§ 1443. Foreign tax-exempt organizations

Note: Do you see anywhere where it says that U.S. citizens are liable to pay a direct unaportioned tax on they're wages? I don't

Note: Nowhere under Title 26 does it define criminal penalties for tax evasion nor does it make individual citizens liable to pay taxes on they're wages


If you ever receive a notice of levy remember to look at paragraph (a) of

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 64 > Subchapter D > PART II > § 6331

(a) Authority of Secretary
If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

Note: According to paragraph A of this section the only person who can impose a tax levy is the secretary of the treasury and the only person who can be levied is a government employee. Therefore the IRS has no authority to impose a tax levy on anyone


Please remember that these are just a few of the reasons why the personal income tax is illegal. In reality the government has no legal authority to tax anyone's wages. They count on the controlled media and the American people's ignorance to keep this fraud going. I intend to shatter that ignorance and to alert everyone to the fact that the government is engaging in massive fraud. If everyone knew that there was no law that required them to pay taxes then what reason would they have to ever pay income taxes again.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,621 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Sep, 2006 03:26 pm
Right. Now, I suggest you inform the IRS of these findings and then try to get the Supreme Court to hear your arguments. Let us know which Federal penitentiary you're doing your time in and we'll send you an A2K Care package.
0 Replies
 
reaper66
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Sep, 2006 03:29 pm
Merry Andrew wrote:
Right. Now, I suggest you inform the IRS of these findings and then try to get the Supreme Court to hear your arguments. Let us know which Federal penitentiary you're doing your time in and we'll send you an A2K Care package.


The supreme court has allready ruled that the income tax is a tax on corporate gains on not on wages. The problem is the IRS does not comply with those decisions. There is no law which requires anyone to pay a direct tax on they're labor. If you don't believe me then show me the law. The IRS is a crimminal agency that is enforcing a tax that it does not have the authority to impose on anyone. There have been IRS agents quit over this.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 12:57 am
reaper66 wrote:
Merry Andrew wrote:
Right. Now, I suggest you inform the IRS of these findings and then try to get the Supreme Court to hear your arguments. Let us know which Federal penitentiary you're doing your time in and we'll send you an A2K Care package.


The supreme court has allready ruled that the income tax is a tax on corporate gains on not on wages. The problem is the IRS does not comply with those decisions. There is no law which requires anyone to pay a direct tax on they're labor. If you don't believe me then show me the law. The IRS is a crimminal agency that is enforcing a tax that it does not have the authority to impose on anyone. There have been IRS agents quit over this.


I hope you feel the same way about the Social Securuty tax and about every other tax we pay.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 05:17 am
Baldimo,

How do you suggest we pay for spreading democracy in the Middle East? That helicopter in you avatar looks expensive.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 05:46 am
Funny, eBrown. I will tell you a funny story about the IRS. A good friend and fellow musician of my husband, moved from one state to another. When audited by the IRS, he simply said that he didn't owe one cent because that would be taxation without representation. He got by with it.

Sorry, reaper. I didn't read through all of your examples, but I do recall Harry Truman saying in his laconic manner. "There are going to be taxes, and you're going to have to pay them."
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 07:47 am
Back to the tax resister arguments

The courts have rejected all your arguments reaper. Not only rejected them but in many cases they refuse to hear them because they are not valid under case law and will sanction anyone attempting to bring them up.

From US Title 26
Quote:
a) General definition
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means
all income from whatever source derived
, including (but not limited
to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions,
fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;
(8) Alimony and separate maintenance payments;
(9) Annuities;
(10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts;
(11) Pensions;
(12) Income from discharge of indebtedness;
(13) Distributive share of partnership gross income;
(14) Income in respect of a decedent; and
(15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust.

Until you can prove you are providing no service to your employer for the wage you are covered here reaper. I am sure you employer would be interested in knowing that you aren't providing any work for the wage he is paying you.

http://www.unclefed.com/Tax-Help/friv_tax.html#II

Quote:
imposed a penalty against Wheelis in the amount of $10,000 for making frivolous arguments.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 07:59 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Baldimo,

How do you suggest we pay for spreading democracy in the Middle East? That helicopter in you avatar looks expensive.


I guess we will pay for them the same way we pay for illegals and lazy people to be on wellfare.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 08:08 am
Re: The income tax is illegal
reaper66 wrote:
Here just a few of the reasons why the income tax as we know it is completely illegal....


http://www.picpop.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10059/jeez.jpg
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 08:10 am
I knew I could find it again....

Idiot Legal Arguments

Here is a lovely site that shows the relevent case law to dispute EVERY one of your silly arguments reaper. All of your arguments have been made and were rejected numerous times by the courts.

Heres the rebuttal to your 16th amendment "idiot argument"

Quote:
Sixteenth Amendment not adopted: mentioning "The Law that Never Was" by Benson & Beckman: US v. Wm.J. Benson (7th Cir 1991) 941 F2d 598 [one of the authors of Law/Never] amended on other grounds 957 F2d 301; [ Benson convicted of tax evasion and sentenced to four years of prison followed by five years probation. US v. Benson (7th Cir 1995) 67 F3d 641 reh.den 74 F3d 152; it appears he violated the terms of his parole. Benson v. US (ND IL 1997) 969 F.Supp 1129]; M.D. Miller v. US (7th Cir 1988) 868 F2d 236; ("The validity of that process [adopting the 16th Amendment] and if the resulting constitutional amendment are no longer open questions.") US v. Sitka (2d Cir 1988) 845 F2d 43 at 47 cert.den 488 US 827; US v. Thomas (7th Cir 1986) 788 F2d 1250 cert.den 479 US 853 (the leading case; held that the Sec of State's 1913 proclamation of the adoption of the 16th Amendment is conclusive and "is now beyond review"); US v. House (WD Mich 1985) 617 F.Supp 237 aff'd (6th Cir 1986) 787 F2d 593(t)(used Benson as a witness, and thoroughly discussed his book); US v. Wojtas (ND IL 1985) 611 F.Supp 118; US v. Sato (ND IL 1989) 704 F.Supp 816 (the Constitutional provision that Congress will have exclusive authority over DC only means that no state govt has authority over DC but it does not limit Congress's authority to make laws, including tax laws, only to DC); O.L. Brown v. CIR (2/9/97) TC Memo 1987-78 (judge declined to buy a copy); Spoelman v. Hummel (WD Mich unpub 5/26/89); US v. Stahl (9th Cir 1986) 792 F2d 1438 cert.den 479 US 1036; Spoelman v. Hummel (WD Mich unpub 5/26/89); {Note: The argument in "The Law That Never Was" by Benson & Beckman is a 1913 legal memo worked up for the Sec. of State by the Solicitor of the State Dept regarding the ratifications received from state legislatures for the proposed 16th amendment, noticing that several of these notifications contained tiny typos in reprinting the text of the proposed amendment. The Solicitor advised that, as a state could not amend or change the proposed text but only vote for or against ratification, and that the proposed amendment was available to members of all the legislatures in a number of published copies - most without any typos, and it is not known whether these typos existed in the copies seen by the members of the legislatures before they voted (no state govt ever complained that its vote on ratification would have gone different without the typos), and certainly the ratifications of previous and undoubted amendments also had similar flaws, that the notification of favorable ratifying votes is binding on the Sec of State, etc., it is presumed that all the votes were taken on the correct and proper text and therefore the ratifications are all valid and sufficient to adopt the amendment. The Sec. of State agreed. Contrary to the claims made by Benson & Beckman, there is no evidence that any ratification of any amendment was ever invalidated because of some typo in repeating the proposed amendment, and in fact there is a distinct shortage of precedents for invalidating an Act of Congress because of a comparable typo distinguishing the bills adopted by the House and the Senate. The book was dealt with in detail in US v. Thomas (7th Cir 1986) 788 F2d 1250 cert.den 479 US 853, and one of the co-authors tried to revive the rejected argument simply because he had written that book in US v. Benson (7th Cir 1991) 941 F2d 598, both times the court held that the validity of the adoption of the 16th Amendment was "beyond review".}
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 08:20 am
I always get a kick out of some of the rulings on this site and how some people refuse to accept the court...

Idiot Legal Arguments

Quote:
wages not "income": US v. Connor (3d Cir 1990) 898 F2d 942 cert.den 497 US 1029; Connor v. CIR (2d Cir 1985) 770 F2d 17 (argument is so frivolous that it can be penalized); Wm. Belz v. US (6th Cir unpub 3/10/86) 787 F2d 588(t); Casper v. CIR (10th Cir 1986) 805 F2d 902; Wilcox v. CIR (9th Cir 1988) 848 F2d 1007 ("First, wages are income. ... Second, paying taxes is not voluntary."); US v. Jones (D NJ 1995) 877 F.Supp 907; Fox v. CIR (2/1/93) TC Memo 1993-37 summ.judg. granted (2/26/96) TC Memo 1996-79; US v. Taylor (6th Cir unpub 3/29/93); O'Brien v. CIR (6th Cir 1985) 779 F2d 52; Wellbaum v. US (D Ore unpub 9/20/91); Young v. IRS (ND Ind 1984) 596 F.Supp 141 ("in the clearest language ... wages are income"); US v. Gerads (8th Cir 1993) 999 F2d 1255 cert.den 510 US 1193; US v. Koliboski (7th Cir 1984) 732 F2d 1328; Brown v. US (4/3/96) 35 Fed.Claims 258 aff'd (Fed Cir 1997) 105 F3d 621; Stubbs v. CIR (11th Cir 1986) 797 F2d 936; Palmer v. CIR (10/9/97) TC Memo 1997-462; Beard v. CIR (1984) 82 Tax Ct 766 (nr. 60) aff'd (6th Cir 1986) 793 F2d 139; L.R. Olson v. US (9th Cir 1985) 760 F2d 1003 (tried to deduct all his living expenses as a"cost of labor"); Koar v. US (SDNY unpub 8/14/98) 82 AFTR2d 6329, 98 USTC para 50748; ("It has been universally held that wages paid for labor and services are taxable income.") Beard v. US (ED Mich 1984) 589 F.Supp 881; Merritt v. CIR (ED Tenn unpub 2/8/84) 53 AFTR2d 619, 84 USTC para 9258 (26 USC sec. 61 "unambiguously" includes compensation for services as taxable income); Lonsdale v. US (10th Cir 1990) 919 F2d 1440 (leading case); Stoecklin v. CIR (11th Cir 1989) 865 F2d 1221; US v. Rhodes (MD Penn 1996) 921 F.Supp 261 aff'd (3d Cir 1996) 101 F3d 693(t) & (3d Cir 1997) 107 F3d 9(t); McNair v. Eggers (11th Cir 1986) 788 F2d 1509; Jensen v. US (D Mass unpub 3/1/84) 53 AFTR2d 1067, 84 USTC para 9283; Holker v. US (8th Cir 1984) 737 F2d 751; Collorafi v. US (EDNY unpub 12/2/83) 53 AFTR2d 464, 84 USTC para 9107; (court said in capital letters that "WAGES ARE INCOME") US v. Dube (7th Cir 1987) 820 F2d 886; US v. Koliboski (7th Cir 1984) 732 F2d 1328; (perp argued that as a laborer "engaged in a common law occupation" his wages were not taxable; "Federal courts have all agreed that wages or compensation for services constitute income and the individuals receiving income are subject to the federal income tax, regardless of its nature.") US v. Melton (4th Cir unpub 3/8/96) 86 F3d 1153(t), 77 AFTR2d 2361 cert.den 519 US 820; Peth v. Breitzman (ED Wis 1985) 611 F.Supp 50 (this plaintiff later convicted for printing fake money orders); US v. Jones (D NJ 1995) 877 F.Supp 907 aff'd 74 F3d 1228; Mathes v. CIR (1986) 252 US App DC 131, 788 F2d 33 cert.den 479 US 972; Roth v. CIR (9/23/92) TC Memo 1992-563; Baronowski v. US Govt thru the CIR (ED La unpub 3/10/86) 58 AFTR2d 5172, 86 USTC para 9436; Bixler v. CIR (7/23/96) TC Memo 1996-329; ("legal garbage ... uniformly resulting in decisions against the protesters") Weller v. CIR (8/5/85) TC Memo 1985-387; ("Courts are in no way obligated to tolerate arguments that thoroughly defy common sense" - both the lawyer and his client subjected to very heavy fines for frivolous pleadings) Charczuk v. CIR (10th Cir 1985) 771 F2d 471; US v. Taylor (6th Cir unpub 3/29/93); Rowlee v. CIR (6/15/83) 80 TC 1111 (the reference to "gain" in the Eisner v. Macomber decision is dicta since the case dealt with taxing stock dividends, and is refuted by the words of Stratton's Independence v. Howbert [1913] 231 US 399 at 415); ditto US v. Rhodes (MD Penn 1996) 921 F.Supp 261 aff'd (3d Cir 1996) 101 F3d 693(t) & (3d Cir 1997) 107 F3d 9(t); Lovell v. US (7th Cir 1984) 755 F2d 517; In re Weatherley (Bankr. E.D. Penn 1994) 169 Bankr.Rptr 555, 25 Bankr.Ct.Dec 1427; US v. House (WD Mich 1985) 617 F.Supp 232 aff'd 787 F2d 593(t); Luesse v. US (D Minn unpub 3/19/84) 53 AFTR2d 1329, 84 USTC para 9389; Walker alias Theonaleth v. CIR (3/12/96) TC Memo 1996-124; Walker alia Theonaleth v. CIR (4/5/93) TC Memo 1993-138 aff'd (2d Cir 1994) 19 F3d 9(t); Ball v. US (D. Ore unpub 8/24/93) 72 AFTR2d 5958, 93 USTC para 50665 sanctions added (D. Ore unpub 10/5/93) 72 AFTR2d 6442; US v. Schiefen (D SD 1995) 926 F.Supp 877 aff'd 81 F3d 166 mand.denied 522 US 1074; Baker v. CIR (10/16/95) TC Memo 1995-495 aff'd (5th Cir 1996) 98 F3d 1338; ("These are tired arguments.") Krah v. US (ND IL unpub 12/11/87) 71A AFTR2d 3001, 88 USTC para 9147; ditto Coleman v. CIR (7th Cir 1986) 791 F2d 68; Hodges v. CIR (7/6/98) TC Memo 1998-242; ditto Cullinane v. CIR (1/4/99) TC Memo 1999-2; (this argument raised in criminal appeal was "frivolous square" and perp would be fined for meritless appeal under a provision that usually applied only to civil appeals) US v. A.D. Cooper (7th Cir 1999) 170 F3d 691. The perp argument that taxable "income" is limited to business (or corporate) profits is wrong, being based on some very early court decisions that dealt only with corporations and not with individuals. Tornichio v. US (ND Ohio unpub 3/12/98) 81 AFTR2d 1377, 98 USTC para 50299; similarly Ghalardi Income Tax Education Foundation [& Webber] v. CIR (12/30/98) TC Memo 1998-460; in one instance the judge himself gave the tax protester copies of some precedent decisions that exploded his arguments but the perp persisted in his futile arguments with the result that the court imposed a very substantial fine ($10G) for frivolous and dilatory litigation. Kinkade v. CIR (6/1/99) TC Memo 1999-180

0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 08:30 am
Re: The income tax is illegal
joefromchicago wrote:
reaper66 wrote:
Here just a few of the reasons why the income tax as we know it is completely illegal....


http://www.picpop.com/gallery/albums/userpics/10059/jeez.jpg



Excellent image, Boss . . . i'm stealin' that one . . .
0 Replies
 
Asherman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 08:35 am
If the income tax is illegal, then you don't have to pay it. Don't. Let us know how it turns out after a couple of years. If the courts rule you don't have to pay, and the IRS doesn't require you to pay back taxes, or any penalties, I'll stop paying my taxes too.

Just one question please, with no tax revenue coming in how will the government be financed? Where will all the money come from to pay for the programs the Federal Government is obligated to fund? Will the military then be a truly "voluntary" force?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The income tax is illegal
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/09/2020 at 03:00:45