BLICK, Big Swiss Newspaper: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"

The rest of the article is in german, the CIA might have fast translators to decifer the message...

Jetzt sagen auch Schweizer zum 9/11: «Steckt doch der Bush-Clan dahinter?»

VON ELIE PETER
15.09.2006 | 12:03:15

ZÜRICH - 2973 Menschen starben bei den Anschlägen von 9/11. «Bin Laden» und «Al Kaida», schrie der Bush-Clan. Die Welt glaubte ihm. Inzwischen zweifeln selbst Wissenschaftler an der Bush-Version. Auch die Schweizer Uni-Dozenten Albert A. Stahel (63) und Daniele Ganser (34) stellen jetzt heisse Fragen.

«Etwas stimmt nicht», sagt Strategieexperte Stahel in der «Weltwoche» und verweist auf den «lückenhaften» offiziellen 9/11-Report der US-Regierung von 2004.

Gegenüber BLICK bestätigt der Uni-Professor die Kritik:

Osama Bin Laden kann «nicht der grosse Pate» hinter den Anschlägen sein. Er habe nicht genug Kommunikationsmittel gehabt.

Stahel bezweifelt, dass ein Passagierflugzeug ins Pentagon krachte: «Für Flug-Anfänger ist es eigentlich unmöglich, das Gebäude so genau zu treffen.»

Sieben Stunden nach den Twin Towers stürzte daneben das World Trade Center 7 ein. Die offizielle Version: Es brannte lange. Stahel: «Gar nichts ist klar.»

Noch weiter als Stahel geht Historiker Daniele Ganser, sein Kollege an der Uni Zürich. Auch die offizielle US-Version nennt er «eine Verschwörungstheorie»: «Es gibt 3 Theorien, die wir gleichberechtigt behandeln sollten»:

«Überraschungs-Theorie» Bin Laden und Al Kaida führten die Anschläge aus.

«Lass es absichtlich passieren» Teile der US-Regierung kannten die Al-Kaida-Pläne. Sie reagierten nicht, um eine Serie von Kriegen zu legitimieren.

«Führe es absichtlich selbst aus» Die Anschläge wurden vom Pentagon und/oder Geheimdiensten ausgeführt. Die Bin-Laden-Videos sind gefälscht. 3000 Menschen wurden für strategische Interessen geopfert.

Ganser: «Je mehr wir forschen, desto mehr zweifeln wir an Bushs Version.» Für ihn ist denkbar, dass die Bush-Regierung verantwortlich war. «Bush hat schon so viel gelogen! Und bereits 1962 gab es im Pentagon einen Plan, unschuldige US-Bürger für eigene Interessen zu opfern.» So weit wie Ganser geht Stahel nicht: «Ich stelle nur Fragen.»

Hier der Link zum Blick:
http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057?display=kommentar

Heutiges Blick-Cover:

http://is.blick.ch/img/gen/P/d/HBPdF4VF_Pxgen_r_442xA.jpg

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 562 • Replies: 6

No top replies

Who cares, except for the 50 potential readers of this rag in Switzerland.

Tell us why you agree with this rag of a paper?

In your own words, please.

0 Replies

woiyo wrote:

Who cares, except for the 50 potential readers of this rag in Switzerland.

Tell us why you agree with this rag of a paper?

In your own words, please.

I want proof, or eat s*** and die.

0 Replies

Although I generally support the conspiracy theorists willingness to explore the possible root causes of 9/11, do we need the same material recycled everyday?
I mean, start looking at the number of views these threads get.
2, 3, 4....12?
Really, we know the alternative story already.
You're now just bumping valuable archived material off the back of the forum.

0 Replies

freedom4free wrote:

woiyo wrote:
Who cares, except for the 50 potential readers of this rag in Switzerland.

Tell us why you agree with this rag of a paper?

In your own words, please.

I want proof, or eat s*** and die.

Got any proof a$$hole?
Your just another sputtering fool.

0 Replies

Quote:

The free newspaper 20 Minutes has overtaken the Blick tabloid to become the most popular daily in Switzerland...20 Minutes - the 30-page tabloid which carries Swiss and international news in short, easy-to-read articles - saw its readership grow 13 per cent last year, from 692,000 to 782,000, following a 40 per cent increase in the previous year. It was followed by Blick with a readership of 736,000, and the "Tages-Anzeiger" with 573,000 readers. The top-selling French language paper was "Le Matin" with 331,000 regular readers. Readers are increasingly favouring papers which adopt a lighter format, said the Zurich-based media research firm, WEMF, which carried out the research... In recent months Blick has also gone tabloid. But Bernhard Weissberg, who oversees the newspaper division of Blick publisher Ringier, declined to comment on how that had affected circulation. Weissberg told swissinfo that 20 Minutes could not be compared with the traditional dailies. "It's a free newspaper, so naturally it is read, but it's very different from what we do. We draw a distinction between a free newspaper and a newspaper which offers depth."

736000 is a few more than woiyo initially believed. But most free tabloids tend to have high readership.
I personally enjoy them when I'm taking a dump.

0 Replies

TRANSLATION:

Was the Bush-Clan behind 9/11?

Swiss University Lecturers ask the HOT QUESTIONS

"The More We Research, the More We Doubt It"

BLICK
BY ELIE PETER
15.09.2006

ZURICH

http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057?display=kommentar

2973 humans died in the events of 9/11. "Bin Laden" and "al-Queda", the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime, even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also the Swiss University lecturers, Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34), now ask hot questions.

"Something is not right", says strategy expert, Stahel, in the "World Week", and he refers to the "incomplete" official 9/11-Report of the US Government of 2004.

In response to BLICK the university professor confirms the criticism:

Osama Ben Laden cannot be "the grand godfather" behind the events. He could not have had enough means of communication.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airline hit the Pentagon: "For flight beginners it would have been actually impossible to target the building so exactly."

Seven hours after the twin Towers collapsed, beside it, the World Trade Center 7 collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Stahel: "nothing at all is clear."

Stahel goes further than historian, Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich. He also calls the official US version "a conspiracy theory": "There are 3 theories, which should we treat equally?":

* "Surprise theory" - Bin Laden and al-Qaeda implemented the events.

* "Let it happen intentionally" - parts of the US Government knew of al-Queda's plans. They did not react, in order to legitimize a series of wars.

* "It was intentionally played out" - the events were implemented by the Pentagon and/or secret services. The Bin Laden videos were falsified. 3000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests.

Ganser: "The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version." It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. "Bush already lied so much! And it already occured in 1962 that the Pentagon had a plan to sacrifice innocent US citizens for its own interests." Stahel does not go as far as Ganser: "I have only questions."

0 Replies

BLICK, Big Swiss Newspaper: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know