Intrepid wrote:xingu wrote:Intrepid wrote:How do you apply your theory to the American Civil War, xingu? Where brother was fighting brother.
Each saw the other as being, or at least accusing the other, of being atheistic. The South used the Bible as justification for their "particular institution". God of the Bible does approve of slavery. The North used religion to show that slavery was inhuman. Both sides saw each other as traitors.
The American Civil War was quite humane if you compare it to the wars of the twentieth century. Civilians, especially women, were, for the most part, treated with respect or at least tolerance. There were no bombings of civilian areas with the intent of killing large numbers of the civilian population as in WW II. And there was nothing like the terrorism that is currently being practiced by Israel and the Muslims fighting them. The only exception I can think of were the guerrilla wars fought in the Appalachians and in the Kansas-Missouri theater. Even the guerrilla warfare conducted by Col. Mosby was quite humane if you compare it to the warfare being conducted in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Americans in the Civil War did not see the enemy in the same light the Israelis and Muslims see each other. Many of the generals that fought each other were friends prior the the war. They served together in the west and the Mexican War. There was a bond between the two that prevented this war from getting out of hand and degrading into the type of conflicts we have today.
Are you serious? Did you read what you wrote? You have now changed the topic to humane? You now compare the wars of today and yesterday? What does that have to do with what was being asked? Do you have facts and proof of the atheism accusations that you say were going on?
Perhaps you didn't read correctly. I said humane as compared to what is happening today. Would you care to dispute that?
Prior to the Civil War both sides used the Bible to justify their stand on slavery. The South, then as today, took a literal interpretation of the Bible. This interpretation endorsed slavery.
The North took a more liberal view of the Bible. Theirs was more in the spirit of the Bible rather than the literal interpretation. For them this meant slavery was evil. Humans of all kinds were to treat others with respect and dignity.
The accusation of atheist was hurled more from the South than the North. As today the conservative view is an intolerant and uncompromising view. As Bush would say your either with us or against us. If against you were blasphemous and at worse atheist. Blasphemous and condemnation to hell was the primary accucation of the South but the big A word was also used to emphasize their point.
Was the A word common? Probably not but it was there as it is today. What was the title of Ann Coulter's latest book?
The Godless North who will not believe Gods word. Slavery is natural. It is good.