1
   

What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to Collapse

 
 
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 08:18 am
What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001?

http://worldtradecentertruth.com/volume/200609/DrJonesTalksatISUPhysicsDepartment
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,090 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 09:12 am
Re: What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to Colla
Solve et Coagula wrote:
What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001?

My money is on "gravity."
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 09:41 am
Everyone's First Reaction Was "Controlled Demolition"
Before the official mind control script kicked in and remains 5 years to the day

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | September 11 2006

Rarely highlighted footage of an NBC news anchor commenting that the collapse of the twin towers was by no means accidental and that it was a "planned" event, emphasizes the point that before the official mind control script was introduced and parroted forevermore, everybody's first reaction was "controlled demolition."

The NBC anchor featured in this clip is simply reacting to the events he is witnessing with common sense in stating that the collapse of the trade towers was obviously a planned event and by no means an accident or a simple consequence of jets hitting the buildings.

"This was clearly -- the way the structure is collapsing -- this was the result of something that was planned."

"This is not, it's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way."

"How they accomplished this, we don't know. But clearly this is what happened."

"TerrorStorm sets a new standard in documentary filmmaking. Alex Jones knocks it out of the park yet again." -Dylan Avery, Director, "Loose Change" - Click here to get the DVD or click here to watch online now! http://prisonplanet.tv/articles/september2006/110906controlleddemolition.htm

This is what I wrote in the late afternoon of September 11, 2001.

"The collapse of the World Trade Center towers is also perplexing. They clearly imploded as if being demolished by carefully placed bombs within the building. The explanation that the aircraft fuel from the Boeing caused the implosion doesn't tally with the footage of the event. Surely such a method would produce a more inconsistent and graphic explosion? The building collapsed symmetrically."

CBS News' Dan Rather also commented that the collapse of building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, resembled a deliberate attempt to demolish the structure using incendiary devices.

"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."

NBC's Pat Dawson reported the working hypothesis of the FDNY in the immediate aftermath of the towers' collapse.

"The chief of safety of the Fire Department of New York City told me he received word of a possibility of a secondary device -- that is another bomb going off. He tries to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said that there was another explosion which took place and according to his theory, he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building."

MSNBC news anchor Rick Sanchez reported that police had found suspicious devices in and around the WTC area and that the secondary explosions, which were reported by numerous survivors, were thought by police to be bombs.

"Police have found what they believe to be a suspicious device and they fear that it may lead to another explosion."

"I spoke with some police officials moments ago, Chris, and they told me they have reason to believe that one of the explosions at the World Trade Center aside the ones caused by the planes, may have been caused by a van that was parked on the building that may have had an explosive device in it."

During an exchange between ABC's Peter Jennings and reporter Don Dahler following the collapse of the north tower, the first assumption is again that controlled demolition must have been used to take down the building.

"Yes Peter its Don Dahler down here. I'm four blocks north of the World Trade Center. The second building that was hit by the plane has just completely collapsed."

"The entire building has just collapsed as if a demolition team set off....when you see the old demolition of these old buildings. It just folded in on itself and it is not there anymore."

Peter Jennings: "If you wish to bring, if anyone has ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows, that you're going to do this you have to get at the, at the under infrastructure of a building and bring it down."

Police chiefs, fire department heads, veteran news anchors, eyewitnesses on the ground - everyone's first reaction was "controlled demolition" because the events suggested nothing else. In the first few hours of 9/11 - bombs in the buildings was almost as equally understood and accepted as the fact that planes had hit the towers.

Just as with the Oklahoma City Bombing - reports of multiple explosions and bombs were commonplace - but the scriptwriters had to concoct a fable that matched the explanation of Timothy McVeigh and a single fertilizer truck bomb. Similarly, anything that contradicted the already decided upon explanation of 9/11, no matter that almost every eyewitness interviewed as the attack unfolded reported bombs, was cut from the final edit of the propaganda.

History is written by the winners - if the government had announced that gargoyles from the planet Jupiter had destroyed the towers with mind rays - the mainstream media would have lined up, saluted, licked boots, and supported that explanation.

The sheer magnitude of trying to overturn such a gargantuan lie as the official story of 9/11 rested on demolishing the power of the initial mind control - the first explanation of what happened is always provided by the government and it always remains as the seal of authenticity, no matter how preposterous. Not enough people dared question the official version of 9/11 in the hours and days after the attack and that's why it stuck.

If the 9/11 truth movement has achieved anything it is the diluting of the influence and credibility the government has in brainwashing the public with its "official version" in the immediate aftermath of major events. Which thankfully makes the much vaunted "next 9/11" less likely in the short-term to happen.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 09:43 am
Re: What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to Colla
joefromchicago wrote:
Solve et Coagula wrote:
What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to COMPLETELY Collapse on 9/11/2001?


My money is on "gravity."


That's one of the admirable things about you, Joe--you're willing to stick your neck out to explore the path less travelled . . .
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 11:15 am
Re: What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to Colla
Setanta wrote:
That's one of the admirable things about you, Joe--you're willing to stick your neck out to explore the path less travelled . . .

I'm a rebel.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Sep, 2006 01:00 pm
Quote:
"This was clearly -- the way the structure is collapsing -- this was the result of something that was planned."

"This is not, it's not accidental that the first tower just happened to collapse and then the second tower just happened to collapse in exactly the same way."

"How they accomplished this, we don't know. But clearly this is what happened."

And we know, now, that it was planned... by the architects.

They were smart guys, and knew that someday the thing might have to come down....
0 Replies
 
Solve et Coagula
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 11:32 am
911 World Trade Center Collapse Video (New Video)
911 World Trade Center Collapse Video (New Video)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-542183109714508590
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 11:35 am
magick

who knows

who gives a ****

as above so below

or as we say now

as above now its down there.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 11:43 am
Re: 911 World Trade Center Collapse Video (New Video)
Solve et Coagula wrote:
911 World Trade Center Collapse Video (New Video)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-542183109714508590


WOW...THAT REALLY REALLY HELPS
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What Caused Not 2 but 3 World Trade Skyscrapers to Collapse
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/20/2019 at 06:37:19