Reply
Mon 4 Sep, 2006 01:28 pm
Bush saw first plane hit the WTC on 9/11. Video contains proof that 9/11 was an inside job
Watch the following videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F6kouXg40Q&mode=related&search
George Bush caught off guard about september 11th
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j9Bj8JJwco
Proof that he admitted seing the crash. As much as I dislike George Bush, I do no see this as proof of any "inside job."
Anyone who believes that W
arranged 9/11 ( that he recruited the Moslems to commit suicide )
demonstrates a sick mind, hopelessly out-of-touch with reality.
Brings NEW MEANING to " paranoid ".
it is odd that he would claim to have "seen" the plane hit the WTC, when in fact, at that time, there was no visual coverage of the event being broadcast.
Between 8:46am (the first plane crash) and 9:15am (the time he entered the classroom), no news agencies were showing video of the event. They were discussing the tragedy, but not, as of that time, showing video.
The official claim is that it was a mistaken recollection....and with Bush, I'm not entirely surprised with either claim.
He called Stephen Harper, "Steve", a name he is not even called by his wife.
I have absolute proof that George Bush personally sabotaged the Titanic.
Brandon9000 wrote:I have absolute proof that George Bush personally sabotaged the Titanic.
At least your credibility is consistent.
Intrepid wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:I have absolute proof that George Bush personally sabotaged the Titanic.
At least your credibility is consistent.
Insults are irrelevant in debate. If it's a serious accusation, then document it. Of course, you cannot.
Brandon9000 wrote:Intrepid wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:I have absolute proof that George Bush personally sabotaged the Titanic.
At least your credibility is consistent.
Insults are irrelevant in debate. If it's a serious accusation, then document it. Of course, you cannot.
No more of an insult to you than your proposition is to the minds and sensibilities of an intelligent audience.
If you can document your original claim, then document it. Of course, you cannot.
Intrepid wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:Intrepid wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:I have absolute proof that George Bush personally sabotaged the Titanic.
At least your credibility is consistent.
Insults are irrelevant in debate. If it's a serious accusation, then document it. Of course, you cannot.
No more of an insult to you than your proposition is to the minds and sensibilities of an intelligent audience.
If you can document your original claim, then document it. Of course, you cannot.
It was sarcasm, obviously. You and your ilk rely almost exclusively for defense of your ideas on comments about the poster disagreeing with you. Actual on-topic, calm, rational, dignified debate is always your last choice, as when eb responded to my polite request that he cite the relevant portion of the Constitution by calling me assinine. I don't mind the insults, but it is a fact that for most of the A2K liberals, simple, logical defenses of a position are virtually unknown. My point, obviously, was that the "Bush is Behind 9/11" conspiracy theory is not supported by the facts.
You, Sir, have mistaken me for a liberal. Of course, that is what happens when you make assumptions without facts.
Intrepid wrote:You, Sir, have mistaken me for a liberal. Of course, that is what happens when you make assumptions without facts.
And you divined my method of reaching that conclusion how?
Brandon9000 wrote:Intrepid wrote:You, Sir, have mistaken me for a liberal. Of course, that is what happens when you make assumptions without facts.
And you divined my method of reaching that conclusion how?
Nothing divine should be attributed.
Brandon9000 wrote:
Quote: I don't mind the insults, but it is a fact that for most of the A2K liberals, simple, logical defenses of a position are virtually unknown. My point, obviously, was that the "Bush is Behind 9/11" conspiracy theory is not supported by the facts.
So...I don't have time (on dial up) to download the video.
Am I correct in assuming it shows Bush talking about seeing the first plane (or the planes) hit the Tower/s?
If so, (much as I despise him) he is doing nothing more sinister than mis remembering. In which case he can join the human race.
Memory is notoriously unreliable...including so called "flashbulb" memories (you know, like where we were when we heard of JFK's death, or when the shuttle blew up etc).
Or given Bush's apparent speech and language problems, he is just as likely to have just said it wrongly.
A lot of people saw it hit. I guess they are all in on it too.
Bella Dea wrote:A lot of people saw it hit. I guess they are all in on it too.
I think the point being made was that he said he saw it before it was made public. This, of course, does not provide any proof of a conspiracy or other involvement.
Intrepid wrote:Bella Dea wrote:A lot of people saw it hit. I guess they are all in on it too.
I think the point being made was that he said he saw it before it was made public. This, of course, does not provide any proof of a conspiracy or other involvement.
Bullsh!t. Those videos were available to the public the same day.
woiyo wrote:Intrepid wrote:Bella Dea wrote:A lot of people saw it hit. I guess they are all in on it too.
I think the point being made was that he said he saw it before it was made public. This, of course, does not provide any proof of a conspiracy or other involvement.
Bullsh!t. Those videos were available to the public the same day.
Of course they were. We ALL know that. Ok..what time were they available? The first crash, that is. And, what time did Bush go into the classroom?
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace