1
   

California Assembly approves universal health care

 
 
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 10:18 am
California Assembly approves universal health care
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
08-29-06
Sacramento

Passage of bill seen as election-year test for Schwarzenegger
Lynda Gledhill, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau.

The Democratic-controlled Legislature is on the verge of sending Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger a bill that would create a state-run universal health care system, testing him on an issue that voters rate as one of their top concerns in this election year.

On a largely party-line 43-30 vote, the Assembly approved a bill by state Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, that would eliminate private medical insurance plans and establish a statewide health insurance system that would provide coverage to all Californians. The state Senate has already approved the plan once and is expected this week to approve changes that the Assembly made to the bill.

Schwarzenegger has said he opposes a single-payer plan like the one Kuehl's bill would create, but the governor has not offered his own alternatives for fixing the state's health care system. As many as 7 million people are uninsured in the state, and spiraling costs have put pressure on business and consumers.

"We know the health care in place today is teetering on collapse," said Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez, D-Los Angeles. "We need to do something to improve it, to reform it, and this is what we are bringing to the table."

Schwarzenegger's office said it had no official position on the bill. The governor has said he would propose solutions to the state's health care crisis in his State of the State address next January if he is re-elected.

"I don't believe that government should be getting in there and should start running a health care system that is kind of done and worked on by government," Schwarzenegger said in July at a speech at the Commonwealth Club. "I think that what we should do is be a facilitator, to make the health care costs come down. The sad story in America is that our health care costs are too high, that everyone cannot afford health care."

The governor hosted a health care summit earlier this year, but no concrete proposals came from the meeting.

If he vetoes SB840, the governor will be reminded of his decision come election day in November, Kuehl said.

"I hope that the people of California will hang the albatross of bad health care around the governor's neck," she said.

Núñez said that while the governor has worked with Democrats on many issues this year, he is on the wrong side of this one.

"The biggest issue facing California today is health care," Núñez said. "This legislation represents yet another and the most important opportunity we have to say to the governor that he needs to embrace the Democratic agenda, just as he has done on prescription drugs and minimum wage."

Labor unions and Democrats will take part in a rally on Wednesday to urge Schwarzenegger to sign the bill.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides is not supporting the Kuehl bill.

"He supports moving toward universal health care by first covering all children and then requiring businesses to cover their employees," said Angelides spokesman Nick Pappas.

Kuehl called the passage of the bill historic because it was the first time both houses of the Legislature have passed a universal health care bill. SB840 must return to the Senate, which approved it once, 25-13, for concurrence before going to Schwarzenegger's desk.

"Every advance you can make for any cause is important," Kuehl said. "Most important, it gives hope for the people of California that this can be done."

SB840 would provide comprehensive medical, dental, vision, hospitalization and prescription drug coverage to every California resident. Anyone could see any doctor or go to any hospital.

"SB840 creates a system of comprehensive health insurance benefits for all Californians that guarantees free choice of doctors and hospitals," Kuehl said. "It creates access for all Californians by steeply reducing administrative overhead and emphasizing preventative and primary care instead of endlessly cutting coverage and access to care or increasing consumer spending."

Republicans and insurance groups oppose the bill, saying it will create an inefficient government bureaucracy.

"This takes us in the wrong direction," said Assemblyman Greg Aghazarian, R-Stockton. "This creates a government-run system akin to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Do we want health care taken care of by another bloated bureaucracy?"

The bill does not account for the costs of the program since it would take several years before any plan was up and running. The plan would create a commissioner and a blue-ribbon commission to examine how the structure would work. An analysis by the Lewin Group, an independent health care consulting firm, said the plan could be paid for with all of the money now being spent on health care.

That would mean combining all state and federal funds, along with business contributions and participant payments and co-payments. The report suggests that funding could come through an 8 percent payroll tax and a 3 percent individual income tax.

SB840 allows California to use its purchasing power to negotiate bulk rates for prescription drugs and durable medical equipment, such as wheelchairs, thus realizing an additional $2 billion in savings, Kuehl's office said.

But eliminating health care insurance plans would eradicate the groups that have the most experience with getting people insured and to doctors, said Chris Ohman, president and CEO of the California Association of Health Plans.

Ohman said other places that are trying universal health care -- such as Massachusetts and San Francisco -- are using health care plans to help facilitate the implementation. He said the insurance companies are in the best position to manage costs.

"If there isn't the focus and drive for advancing preventative programs, the sky's the limit in terms of what the costs will be," he said. "That's what health plans do."

A Public Policy Institute poll from September 2004 showed that 71 percent of likely voters said they are at least somewhat concerned about being able to afford health care. A slim majority of Californians, 53 percent, said they would be willing to pay more -- either through higher health insurance premiums or higher taxes -- to increase the number of people who have health insurance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The plan - The health care measure would:

-- Eliminate private health insurance plans and create the California Health Insurance System.

-- Provide health care insurance for all Californians.

-- Guarantee patients the ability to choose their own doctors and hospitals.

-- Pool funds now being spent on health insurance and save money by reducing overhead and using leveraged buying power for things like prescription drugs.

-- Require separate legislation to establish financing of the system.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 238 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 12:50 pm
<snork>

The insurance companies are calling the government bloated and ineffective!

Dear Pot, please allow me to introduce my good friend Kettle.

We ALREADY pay for health care for the uninsured and we pay more for it than if we payed to give them some kind of basic health care coverage.

Why not just make it official with a single payer plan?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 02:12 pm
Wow. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. The insurance companies will be getting really active to kill this bugger.

Of course, the citizens in any jurisdiction that has a healthcare program in place (like Canada) would set to their politicians with axes and pitchforks if their programs were put in jeopardy.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 08:21 am
Americans Lacking Health Benefits Reach 46.6 Million
Americans Lacking Health Benefits Reach 46.6 Million
By Matthew Benjamin and Kerry Young
Aug. 29, 2006
Bloomberg

The number of people living in the U.S. without medical insurance rose 2.9 percent to a record 46.6 million in 2005 as health-care costs climbed.

The share of those in poverty was unchanged at 12.6 percent, following four straight years of increases, the Census Bureau said today. Median household income rose for the first time since 1999. The U.S. economy expanded 3.2 percent and added 2 million jobs in 2005.

Republicans and Democrats in Washington have failed to find solutions to soaring medical expenses, which rose three times as fast as wages in 2005, researchers say. Last year marked the fifth straight increase in the number who lack health benefits. States such as Massachusetts are working out their own plans to get insurance for more people.

``There is not any bipartisan vision from Washington for how you would cover a substantial number of people,'' said Robert Blendon, a professor of policy at the Harvard University School of Public Health in Boston. ``The parties are so far apart that they can't even talk about how to move this thing ahead.''

The number of people lacking health insurance rose even with a 1.1 percent gain in median household income to $46,326 last year, the Census Bureau said. Incomes rose 2.9 percent in the Northeast and 1.5 percent in the West and were unchanged in the South and Midwest. New Jersey had the highest median income, $61,672, while Mississippi had the lowest, $32,938.

Children

President George W. Bush, a Republican, has tried to make health care cheaper by offering tax-free health savings accounts and supporting efforts in Congress to allow small business more clout with insurance companies, said Emily Lawrimore, a White House spokeswoman.

Bush also has expanded the federal Medicare health plan to include drug coverage, she said.

The Republican approach is leaving more children without insurance, said Representative Pete Stark, a California Democrat, in a statement. The Census Bureau found the number of children without health insurance rose to 8.3 million, or 11.2 percent, from 7.9 million, or 10.8 percent.

``The decrease in coverage is not an accident,'' Stark said. ``Republicans' 'consumer-driven health agenda' is designed to dismantle the employer-based system and put more children and families on their own.''

The number of people obtaining insurance through employers and government programs was little changed, the Census Bureau said. About 174.8 million, or 59.5 percent, of Americans got coverage from employers. About 80 million, or 27.3 percent, are in government programs, including 38.1 million, or 13 percent, in the state-federal Medicaid program for the poor.

Poverty

About 37 million people live in poverty in the U.S., or one in eight, the Census Bureau said. The rate and number were statistically unchanged from 2004.

``Every year as you move away from a recession, you expect the growth of the poverty rate to slow and eventually reverse,'' says Austin Nichols, an expert on child poverty at the Urban Institute in Washington.

The Census considered a family of four poor if it had annual income of $19,971 or less. People living alone are poor if they make $9,973 or less, the government said. New Hampshire had the lowest percentage of poor residents, 7.5 percent. Mississippi had the highest, 21.3 percent.

One in Six

Texas had the highest percentage of people without health insurance, 24.6 percent. Minnesota had the lowest, 8.7 percent. The proportion of people living in the U.S. without health insurance rose to 15.9 percent last year from 15.6 percent in 2004, the government said. The number with health insurance rose by 1.4 million to 247.3 million.

Health costs are becoming more of a challenge for state officials, said Harvard's Blendon. Massachusetts passed the nation's first law requiring all adults to have health insurance by July 1, 2007. Massachusetts will help some of its poorest residents buy insurance.

The cost of insurance bought through an employer increased 9.2 percent in 2005 as wages climbed 3.2 percent, according to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation in Menlo Park, California.

A lack of health insurance led Susan Squire, 57, of Warren, Michigan, to file for bankruptcy in October. She had $91,000 in medical bills from a January 2005 heart attack and subsequent surgery. Squire, who was making about $21,000 a year with part- time bookkeeping work, says she tried to negotiate discounts.

``I paid some off. I paid some down. I was trying to pay them off one by one,'' Squire said in a telephone interview. ``Some went along with me, but the bulk of them did not. They started with the daily calls, the daily notices, the daily threats.''
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 08:33 am
At least all the people that work for insurance companies will be able to have health insurance while they are unemployed. Don't know how they will pay their mortgages or buy food, but at least they will have health insurance.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 09:24 am
So what? We can't hold back progress b/c people need to keep their jobs.

It's like crying for all those poor typewriter factory workers.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » California Assembly approves universal health care
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 12:23:01