Shocking election-theft testimony

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Shocking election-theft testimony

Posted by Evan Derkacz August 23, 2006.

Vote-rigging software written for Republican...

http://alternet.org/images/managed/media_alternetvideoelectronicvoteriggingtestimony399951.jpg

CLICK ABOVE TO WATCH VIDEO

Computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testifies under oath before the U.S. House Judiciary Members in Ohio (back in 2004) -- video to the left (partial transcript below). Stephen Pizzo writes:

Code:

If you can watch this entire video, and still use an electronic voting machine, you deserve the government you get. If your state or district has decided to use electronic voting machines this November demand an absentee ballot today. Watch this video. Then join those of us who have decided that since paper was good enough for our constitution, it's good enough for our vote too.



Oh, and when you're done watching the whole video... pass it along. November is only a a few weeks off and the last thing Republicans want to see is either house returned to Democrat control. Because if that happens, hearings happen. And if hearings happen... well, who knows - someone(s) could go to jail. So, demand a paper ballot or an absentee ballot in Nov. and leave the cheaters with a pocket full of worthless Diebold electrons.

A partial transcript:

Are there computer programs that can be used to secretly fix elections?

Yes.

How do you know that to be the case?

Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for Congressman Tom Feeney [R-FL]...

It would rig an election?

It would flip the vote, 51-49. Whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win.

And would that program that you designed, be something that elections officials... could detect?

They'd never see it.

Alternet

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 643 • Replies: 4

No top replies

A piece of paper and a ballpoint pen is still the best way to vote.
.
The 'new and improved' system smells like corruption.

0 Replies

Quote:

Court told votes don't have to be counted, certified

A motion to dismiss a congressional election challenge in California took on national implications last week when defense attorneys argued that no court has jurisdiction to intervene in an election after Congress has sworn in a member.

Translation: Once we've stolen it, it should stay stolen!

0 Replies

Surprise, surprise. Look into the election of 1876 between Samuel Tilden (Dem) and Rutherford Hayes (Repub). Tilden rose to fame from his handling of the investigation into voter fraud involving the Tammany Hall gang headed by William Macy Tweed in New York.
Of course back then voting wasn't near as regulated and controlled as it is now. Different weights and colors of paper were used making it easy for illiterates to tell the difference between the partys. They also used to stamp the partys logo on the ballots. There were armed gangs that roamed the streets on election day intimidating voters and men in the lines that would vote visit the barber and shave their beards and return to vote a second, third and fourth time.
An interesting read might be Andrew Gumbel's "Steal This Vote". It is NOT slanted towards Republicans or Democrats but is a very revealing book regarding the history of fraud in U.S. elections.

0 Replies

The audacity of these politicians is reprehensible!

I think it was Plato who once said that "One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors". Honestly, I don't think it makes a damn whether your involved or not. The machine of politics runs itself and requires little, if any, input from the people.

www.thenation.com/doc/20060717/gumbel

0 Replies

Shocking election-theft testimony

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know