Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:26 am
A Soldier's Soldier


http://www.ivaw.org/files/images/JAN27DC-013.jpg


http://www.ivaw.org/node/1258
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 03:34 am
'Impeach'

Michael Moore: 'Bush Administration Guilty of War Crimes'


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txK6Yr3objo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkX5p8-ns1A
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 11:51 am
Endymion wrote:
A Soldier's Soldier
By Neil Heckman




Always for a glory that fades into oblivion and turns the ashes to wrath....

Keep it flowing, Endy....
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 26 Jul, 2007 03:51 am
Harry Potter and the Dementors of Guantánamo

Leah Anthony Libresco: I was one of 50 students to write and sign a letter asking the president to condemn torture. While I wouldn't say Harry Potter was my only role model in speaking truth to power, he was an inspiration.



This post, written by Leah Anthony Libresco, originally appeared on The Huffington Post

I've grown up with Harry Potter. The final book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, comes out on my eighteenth birthday. As I've matured, the message of the series has become clear to me: the most important power is the courage to do what is right. We don't have to be wizards to save the world.

Thank goodness.

One month ago, I met President Bush as a Presidential Scholar. At the photo-op, I was one of 50 students to write and sign a letter asking the president to condemn torture and extraordinary renditions and to repudiate his signing statement to the McCain anti-torture bill. While I wouldn't say Harry Potter was my only role model in speaking truth to power, I did admire his decision to speak out against the excesses of power in his own government, the Ministry of Magic.

Book Six, Half Blood Prince introduced the new Minister of Magic, Rufus Scrimgeour, who is described as, "decisive... a man of action" (p 61). Unfortunately, just as in our world, it is not enough for a leader to be decisive; s/he must make thoughtful decisions based on data, and, once Scrimgeour gets down to business, his certainty is detrimental as he uses his power badly.

Harry comes face to face with the consequences of this misguided use of power when he discovers that an acquaintance, Stan Shunpike, has been arrested and sent to Azkaban prison on suspicion of being a Death Eater. The prison is a hellish place, patrolled by Dementors, grim specters who feed off human emotion and drive their charges into madness. Stan had, until then, appeared to be harmless, and Harry confides to his friend Hermione that the Ministry appears to be overreacting. Hermione responds, "They probably want to look as though they're doing something... People are terrified..."

Arthur Weasley, who works at the Ministry, confirms Harry's worries about Stan. "He's about as much a Death Eater as this satsuma...but the top levels want to look as though they're making some progress, and 'three arrests' sounds better than 'three mistaken arrests and releases.'"

At the end of Half-Blood Prince, Harry is at the funeral of Albus Dumbledore, who has been his most powerful guide. The circumstances of Dumbledore's death promise to be a major theme in the final volume, but the most telling aspect of the close of the book is the conflict between Harry and Scrimgeour. The Minister had previously asked Harry to come out publicly in support of Ministry policies. Harry had refused. When they meet again, Scrimgeour is just as eager to have Harry on his side. Harry turns him down again, saying simply, "Released Stan Shunpike yet?"

I put down Book Six, only to read in the newspaper that the Bush administration had decided, in the words of John Yoo, the former legal counsel for the executive branch, that bans on torture "do not apply" to President Bush. Congress, he said, "may no more regulate the President's ability to detain and interrogate enemy combatants than it may regulate his ability to direct troop movements on the battlefield." So much for the escapist nature of fantasy novels.

Clearly, the wizarding world had taken a turn for the worse, reflecting the disturbing reality of our post-9/11 muggle world. Whether coincidentally or presciently, J.K. wrote a book that mirrors the fear-inspired, civil liberties-deprived times in which we find ourselves today. Like Harry, we face a very real threat. And, like Harry, we must stand strong in defense of basic human rights. I know that Stan Shunpike will have to wait for the conclusion of the series for justice, but the prisoners in Guantánamo should not wait one more day. A state of war, especially perpetual war, cannot justify the abandonment of rights. Harry expected more from his government. We should, too.

http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/Newsweek/Components/Photos/Mag/061030_Issue/061021_HarryPotter_xtrawide.jpg
Harry fights Dementors


http://www.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/impeach_love.jpg
The Demented
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Jul, 2007 09:10 pm
I'm not going to post up the article linked - for various reasons. If you want to be informed about the depth of sh*t we are getting into - read right through to the very end. Believe what ever you will. But ask yourself how you would have to feel - about the loss of your country and its people - to make you write such a thing to those you believed (rightly) had destroyed your world.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18079.htm


Then ask yourself what you are going to do about it
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Jul, 2007 09:39 pm
Friends 1



He could make us laugh like fools
when the world seemed turned against us
He could lift us right back up
with no fuss
He was adventurous
But never rash
Never over-stepping or acting brash
He was generous
He liked to tell stories
of troubles times and ancient glories
And once he told an epic tale
about a girl
A General's daughter
and how he'd done things with her
that he really shouldn't ought-ta
And most important
he understood he was one of us
and when they blew him to pieces
when they left him in the dust
when they crucified him
with their blood lust
he was in love
He was a father of a son
and he was killed by friends
on the home run



Endymion 2007




Friends 2



If I were a Jewish man
would I weep
at the sound of a violin?
Would the thought
of scared children in the night
haunt me?
Or the sight of a swastika
on the side of a tank
taunt me?
And if I were an Arab
what then?
Would the Jewish man
be my friend?



Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 28 Jul, 2007 01:37 am
Endymion wrote:

Then ask yourself what you are going to do about it


....been asking this question to myself for the past few years......

Will I ever find an answer? Question

I know I can do more then just watch my city(and Hell, I love this place...love this f*ckin' country) come under the red-alert, more then just watch bloodstained clothes and bones, more then just wait for them to identify who the head belonged to......

but what?

We'll all find our answers, Endy, I know THAT too....

Thank you for encouraging me....

always,

Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 Jul, 2007 03:22 am
Thanks Naima - your strength is an inspiration to me. Here are a couple of other teenagers who are showing up the adult world

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0727_03.jpg

Teens March Across US to Protest War
by Mike Wilson

MONTEZUMA, Iowa - Two teens from opposite coasts are marching across the country for peace, hoping to gain followers and attention with each step.

Ashley Casale, 19, of Clinton Corners, N.Y., and Michael Israel, 18, of Jackson, Calif., had hoped others who oppose the war in Iraq would join them on their 3,000-mile walk from San Francisco to Washington.
However, since they started off May 21, it's just been the two of them for the most part.

"Although it's always nice to have as many people as possible, it's more about the message and we haven't been disappointed there aren't tons of people walking," Casale said.

It wasn't what Casale planned when she started a Web site and sent fliers to colleges nationwide to promote what she called the "March for Peace." Still, after 1,600 miles and three pairs of sandals, she seemed satisfied with the march's progress.

The two met 10 minutes before beginning their journey. Casale just finished her freshman year at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, and Israel recently graduated from high school.

Israel learned of the anti-war walk from the Web site. "I was looking for something bigger to do than just a weekend rally," he said.

On Wednesday, the two stopped for lunch in Montezuma. Wearing T-shirts and displaying deep tans, the two described the blisters and achy knees they have endured as they crossed the western deserts, the Rocky Mountains and the Great Plains.

"We've never thought about quitting, but there are parts of the country that are so isolated and towns are so far between we feel like we're alone without any support, but then we come across a town and see the support we have and it helps," Casale said.

They said most people have been receptive, even if they have not agreed with their position on the war.

One retired farmer and World War II veteran in Nebraska met them along the side of the road with a welcome sign and had dinner with them, they said. Other people have brought them food and water, opened their homes or let them camp in their yards.

Then there are those who greeted them with obscene gestures and yells.

Still, Israel said he felt good about what he and Casale have accomplished.

"I hope it inspires people to be more vocal and politically active and become more aware of what's going on around them," he said.

Both acknowledge they get homesick. Casale said she calls home once a day - at her mother's insistence. Israel calls his family at least twice a week.

They rely on each other for emotional support but insist their friendship hasn't become romantic. "We're just friends," Casale said, smiling.

Casale and Israel said they have gone two weeks without clean clothes and a week without a shower. They go through a lot of water, sunscreen and bandages for blisters.

They hope to reach Iowa City for a peace rally on Friday and to arrive in Washington by Sept. 11. Along the way they hope their message will be heard.

"Our message is about ending the war in Iraq, but it's more than that," Casale said. "It's about cultivating peace in our daily lives and responding to things in a peaceful, nonviolent way."

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/27/2811/
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 Jul, 2007 07:04 am
Beware of Mr Brown. He's after your rights


The new Prime Minister is subtler than Mr Blair, but he also believes our freedom gets in the way of security

Henry Porter
Sunday July 29, 2007
The Observer

It is precisely because the Prime Minister appears so earnest and reasonable - is so solicitous, so keen to discover common ground, so conscious of our tradition of rights and freedom, and so strategic in the presentation of his case - that he represents a far greater threat to civil liberties than did his predecessor.

Gordon Brown would never say 'civil liberties arguments are made for another age', because it is too crass. Of course the arguments should be heard, their moral force acknowledged and their proponents saluted, but then gently nudged out of the way by the imperatives of security. The exceptionalism that Tony Blair pleaded is, in confronting what Brown called the 'generation-long challenge to defeat al-Qaeda related terrorist violence', still intact.

He has asked for 56 days' detention without charge and has placed ID cards, now referred to as 'ID security' - cleverly linking the cards to ideas of personal protection - at the heart of the counter-terrorist strategy. Neither measure is proven to add to our capacity to fight terror, yet both represent the gravest possible menace to the store of freedom in this country. In the name of security, the state increases its power over the individual and will be soon be in a position to apply it in areas of our life that have nothing to do with the fight against al-Qaeda. That is why a Labour government again attempts to entrench ID cards in the armoury of terror measures, even though they clearly did not stop Madrid and would not have stopped the 7/7 bombers.

The government certainly has a duty to protect its citizens but we must be very careful before giving up the principles of detention and punishment without trial, as well as the jewels of privacy and of freedom of movement, which the ID card national identity register threatens. The innate character of every government is to increase the power of the state to deal with problems that it declares are unprecedented. It is a default position that requires a rigorous response from the opposition, for once these things are lost they never come back without a fight.

Gordon Brown is subtler than Tony Blair. He does not present this as a test of his will. There was not a trace of vanity nor hysteria in the statement to the House of Commons last Wednesday, merely a sense of duty. Brown is also much, much more powerful than Blair was when he tried to get 90 days without charge through the Commons. The Prime Minister has no opposition on anything in cabinet, the Parliamentary Labour Party will be reluctant to challenge him ahead of what may be an early election called because of the favourable opinion polls, and he has Rupert Murdoch and the Daily Mail on his side. The YouGov poll last week suggested that 74 per cent of voters supported the idea that police should be allowed to detain terrorist suspects for as long as they like provided judicial safeguards were in place.

But none of this means he is right and it is going to take some brave people to raise their voices against the orthodoxy that in order to guard our society we must gradually remove the foundation stones of its system of freedoms.

The Liberal Democrats were solid last Wednesday and their leader, Ming Campbell, correctly pointed out that the police are bound to argue for increased detention without charge because they will always ask for more powers. And being a lawyer, he understands that it would blur the separation of powers if Parliament were put in charge of supervising individual cases of detention. To have politicians taking over the role of the judiciary would set a very dangerous precedent.

By contrast, David Cameron seemed weak. That was partly because the government has stolen policies such as the unified border force (but without the police) but also because he was not speaking with the conviction that should be second nature to a party that has usually valued the freedom of the individual against state control. He did mention the Bill of Rights, floated in the green paper on the constitution, and we should remind ourselves that according to the Rowntree Trust, three-quarters of voters want a Bill of Rights and 68 per cent want a written constitution, which would presumably prevent 56 days' detention without charge.

Deep down, the British understand the importance of rights. Yet the language of freedom can seem lame when you know that there have been 15 terrorist plots since 9/11; some 30 plots are said to be in the making by the security services; and the Daily Mail and the Sun are clamouring for something to be done. In fact the most important and courageous stand in these anxious times is to speak out against the 56 days. All opposition parties need to signal that they will vote against the move so as to give heart to the Labour rebels who voted against 90 days. It promises to be the biggest clash of the autumn and it is important that the case is made now and that Gordon Brown's search for the common ground does not amount to the opposition parties caving in to him, or to his friends in the press.

At this moment it looks as though Labour's ascendancy could last another five or six years. We may be only at the start of a long Gordon Brown premiership. He has had good reviews so far because he is an exceptionally gifted politician and striking a different note from Blair presents him with no difficulty whatsoever.

Having recently had a conversation with him about liberty and terror laws, I have no doubt about his sincerity but it was also clear that his mind is made up and that he is unlikely to be swayed by consultation. I wondered whether a similar conversation would take place after he had won an election and beheld the true extent of the power of his office as left to him by Tony Blair. He certainly makes the right noises in the green paper and in last Wednesday's statement but in the cold light of morning what we are left with is a man who supports a fiercely intrusive ID card system and who is pushing to lock up people without charge for nearly two months.

It took a few years for Mrs Thatcher to become Thatcherite and for the character of Tony Blair's premiership to become settled and apparent. Brown could go either way. He may become a great Prime Minister or one who reflexively resorts to increasing state powers. It's too early to judge but I won't be surprised if in four or five years the crisis of liberty in this country is much graver than it is today. As things stand, we are leading Western democracies into an authoritarian world of arbitrary state powers and total surveillance of people's movements and personal lives.

We should not be finessed by the charm of Gordon Brown's seriousness to accept short-term measures that damage our liberty in the long term. And if we want to know his true attitudes to liberty and rights, we have only to watch his behaviour in other areas of the law. Besides the question of demonstrations in and around Parliament Square, we have not heard him address a word on the rights that Tony Blair took away from us so high-handedly - nothing on the freedom to protest, public order laws, mass interception of private correspondence, the use of terror laws to pursue ordinary criminal matters or the unscrutinised surveillance of British motorways and town centres. The hard fact is that Gordon Brown may be a much more organised and more intelligent foe than any of us in Liberty Corner realised.

[email protected]

_____________________________________________

Jellybrain

July 29, 2007 1:31 AM

A good article.

The growth of the strength of the state here in the UK is indeed terrifying. The status of the "private" individual is being seriously challenged.

In all seriousness, I have two small children, I really wonder whether it is in their best interests to grow up here. England used to be about freedom, now every aspect of our lives will be subject to review by faceless and unaccountable public servants at their slightest whim - truly a recipe for disaster and great evil.

What makes all this even more unpalatable is that we all know ultimately the massively expanded personal archives that the state will increasingly efficiently compile, will be hawked to the highest commercial bidder for targeted marketing opportunities.

Is this vision what the Labour party is for? Where are the bloody Tories, who are so identity challenged that they haven't remembered that it is the purpose of Conservatism to stand up for freedom. Cameron, here is your killer topic, beat Brown up for clipping our freedoms you muppet.

England is rapidly becoming a scary place, and none of us are doing anything about it.

Without freedom, without privacy, we are all slaves.

________________________________________________________

jarrah

July 29, 2007 4:42 AM

I completely agree. Brown is a menace. He has always supported ID cards and the database that goes with it, and has happily bent the truth to push them through (he babbled on about then being vital to prevent identity theft).

This Labour government represent the greatest threat to individual liberty since the second world war. The balance of power is moving ineluctably towrads the state. It is not just in civil liberties, but also more subtly, in the financial legislation. More and more powers given to the Inland Revenue to interfere in your life, scrutinise your bank account, remove money from your bank account; more powers to the CSA to deduct money directly from salaries without consultation, more and more powers given to bailiffs to enter your home by force and remove your property, less and less rights for the individual against the mechanisms of the state. Mr Porter is right. Brown has no intention of repealing any of Blair's iniquitous legislation. Instead he is quietly adding to it.

We are fast moving to a position where the State has all powers and we have none. We are becoming slaves.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2137112,00.html

While my country goes to the dogs i ponder on the sanity of my leaders and ask myself what i should do - knuckle down and lick their boots or stand up and say NO to oppression - and be made to feel like a criminal

Blimey - there used to be a time when all we had to worry about was how to find a decent dentist
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 Jul, 2007 06:17 pm
Harry Patch - is the last British man alive to have served in the trenches during the First World War. Here's a write up from the Telegraph

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/graphics/2007/07/12/ftharry112.jpg

'I've never got over it'

"The poor bloody infantry. Dead right. That's what we were. For 1/6d a day."

As the Queen marks the 90th anniversary of Passchendaele, the last survivor talks to Neil Tweedie about the trenches

The friends and relatives of Harry Patch provided three cakes for his birthday last month, but there was - wisely, given his slight shortness of breath - no attempt to top them with a full complement of candles.
Henry John Patch would be notable simply by virtue of his 109 years on earth. When he was born, on June 17, 1898, the Marquess of Salisbury was Prime Minister and Queen Victoria had two and a half years still to reign. Kitchener was 11 weeks away from fighting the Battle of Omdurman and the outbreak of the Boer War lay 16 months into the future. H G Wells's latest work, The War of the Worlds, had just been published in book form following its successful serialisation in Pearson's Magazine.

But Harry Patch is more than a gerontological phenomenon. The man arranging his medals and sitting up straight for a photograph in the conservatory of a nursing home in Wells is the last British man alive to have served in the trenches during the First World War. The last survivor of Passchendaele, that three-month orgy of blood-letting in the mud of Flanders which began 90 years ago this month and commemorated by the Queen at Tyne Cot cemetery in Belgium today. The last Tommy of the Great War.

When he is gone, the British experience of daily life on the Western Front will be no man's land. No living man's land.

There are two other men alive who served between 1914 and 1918, but neither experienced the living nightmare of the front line. Henry Allingham, born two years earlier than Mr Patch, served in France with the Royal Naval Air Service and occasionally visited the front to recover downed aircraft, while Bill Stone was called up for the Royal Navy only two months before the Armistice and did not see action.

Mr Patch takes no pride in being the last of the millions who fought and died amid unmitigated horror. His improbable status sometimes overwhelms him, reducing him to silent contemplation.

"The poor bloody infantry. Dead right. That's what we were. For 1/6d a day."

His speech is slow and deliberate; gentle, rusty Somerset. Kaiser is pronounced "Kay-zer", with a long "z".

That he is sitting here, listening to children in a nearby playground, is a testament to life's caprice. He should have died 90 years ago, on a black night in September 1917, with his mates. It would have been an unremarkable death: one more shredded body to add to

He was part of a Lewis Gun team in the Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry, a close-knit family drawn closer together by the knowledge that machine-gunners, by virtue of the mayhem they wrought among advancing infantry, were likely to receive no mercy if over-run.

That night, his battalion had been pulled out of the line and was moving to the rear over open ground when a German shell, a "whizz-bang", exploded. The young Private Patch was wounded in the groin by a shell splinter. One other member of the five-strong team survived. The others were blown to pieces.

"It killed Number Three - he came from Truro - and Number Four and Number Five. Jack and Jill we called those two. They came from Falmouth. Number Three was known as Maudy. There was an actress of that name. He had a good sense of humour."

Were they good friends? "All of us."

Did they look after each other? "Always."

The British Empire suffered 500,000 dead and wounded during the three months of Third Ypres, as Passchendaele is more properly known. The offensive was the brainchild of the British commander-in-chief, Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig, and didn't take long to bog down in the morass created by incessant artillery bombardment and constant rain. Casualties mounted.

Between the start of the campaign on July 31 and its end on November 8, an average of 5,000 men a day were killed or wounded, and all for the capture of a few miles of desecrated land.

Harry Patch grew up in Coombe Down, near Bath. He left school at 15 and trained as a plumber. He was 16 when war broke out and reached 18 just as conscription was being introduced. Unlike many of the young men who smilingly signed up for death and dismemberment, he had no illusions.

"I knew what to expect. My mother had three sons. My oldest brother suffered from asthma. He didn't pass. My middle brother was a regular soldier. Royal Engineers. Serving in Africa. He was called home and wounded at Mons. I knew what it was going to be like: dirty, filthy, insanitary."

It met his expectations. There were the lice that clung to the body and the rats that gnawed fearlessly at bootlaces. And the mud. Thick brown liquid quite capable of drowning a man. The shell burst that killed his friends ended Mr Patch's three or so months in the front line.

"I can remember the shell bursting. I saw the flash, I must have passed out. The next thing I could remember was the dressing station. A wound in my groin. The nurse painted something around it to stop the lice getting at it. I was given a good hot bath. The lice came off - you could pick them up with a shovel - bloody things."

There was a shortage of anaesthetic and he had to be held down as the shell splinter was removed. The medical officer asked him if wanted to keep it as a souvenir. Mr Patch told him what he could do with it. "The fella in the next bed said to me, 'If he writes anything in that book, you're for Blighty.' Well, he did write in the book. I didn't believe it until someone came in and called my name and number. I went to Rouen."

During his recovery in Britain, he met his first wife. "Knocked her down. She was coming down some steps from the cinema and I was running for the bus and knocked her down. Picked her up, dusted her off and it started from that." They were married for 56 years and had two sons, both of whom have since died.

Mr Patch has few mementos from the war. He was too old to fight in the Second World War and worked as a sanitary engineer in American army camps in the south-west. He retired in 1963. Following his first wife's death in 1976, he married again at the age of 81. His second wife died five years ago.

His membership of that steadily diminishing band of British veterans of the war to end all wars has earned him audiences with the Queen and the French Légion d'honneur. A few years ago he was taken to meet a German veteran who had fought opposite him in Flanders. "Nice old chap. A pacifist. Same as me. Why did they suffer, those millions of men?"

The afternoon is wearing on and Mr Patch is tired. He pauses to listen to the children playing. What does it feel like to be the last of those millions, that army of ghosts?

"I don't like it," he says and then adds: "I sit there and think. And some nights I dream - of that first battle. I can't forget it.

"I fell in a trench. There was a fella there. He must have been about our age. He was ripped shoulder to waist with shrapnel. I held his hand for the last 60 seconds of his life. He only said one word: 'Mother'. I didn't see her, but she was there. No doubt about it. He passed from this life into the next, and it felt as if I was in God's presence.

"I've never got over it. You never forget it. Never."

July 2007


_______________________________________


- Thankyou, Sir -
for speaking honestly about war
and for being a great example to us all

Here's to Peace





***********************************************



No Man's Land (For Harry Patch)

The bones of trees and dead men
Sharp as knives
Twisted naked
Half buried
Smiling at the sky, they float
in their dream of mud
with worm and centipede
and lie like tired children
under charcoal limbs
that call out to the sky
This cruel torment of land and mind
Economy waged on the common man
Conscription
Destruction
Can we ignore the screams
of the wire-caught dove
when she is Liberty?
The answer dies unspoken
We are alone now



Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 05:33 pm
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0731_02.jpg



"Genocide is a crime against humanity as a whole, not just against it's immediate targets. It therefore falls on the world at large to act."
ekaxuf4,
Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
[/i]

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/31/1_225451_1_3.jpg

Darfur - where More than 2.1 million people have been driven into camps and an estimated 200,000 people killed in the conflict over the last four years.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/6DFF847A-D465-415D-B4C0-7034FF914BB6.htm

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/7/30/1_225375_1_5.jpg

Iraq, where up to eight million Iraqis require immediate emergency aid, with nearly half of the population living in "absolute poverty", according to a report by Oxfam and a coalition of Iraqi groups.

About four million people are lacking food and "in dire need of different types of humanitarian assistance", said the report, released in Amman on Monday.
[size=7][/size]

"Many of the figures and percentages in the report were actually derived from UN sources… so we concur with the findings"

Said Arikit, spokesman for the UN mission in Iraq


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/CD761ADB-3523-4DC1-B106-2B5FC76A8674.htm

*********************************************************

Meanwhile, back at the ranch....

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/0730_05_1.jpg

US plans $20bn arms sale to Gulf

The United States is planning a series of arms deals worth at least $20bn with Saudi Arabia and five other Gulf states, US newspapers are reporting.

The New York Times and The Washington Post reported on Saturday that the Bush administration was preparing to ask congress to approve the arms sales over the next decade.

Five other oil-rich Gulf States - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the UAE - are likely to receive equipment and weaponry from the arms sales.

Israel and Egypt are also to benefit from military aid, the newspapers said.

The state department and the White House made no comment.


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/52FB7C4B-5A71-42A1-A3C9-C96DFAE76C1D.htm


Hold on a minute - wasn't it Saudi pilots that hit the towers on 9/11?
What the f*ck?

Are we all going to stand by and watch Iraq, Iran, Syria, Gaza and who knows who else get wiped out like this????

The poor bloody Iraqis - we do this to them, and then we haven't got the guts to face up to it and so we turn our backs on them and let them die the hard way - maybe the ones who were blown to pieces when we invaded were the lucky ones


http://www.commondreams.org/images2007/0730-08a.jpg

Don't look at me, kid Drunk
i don't know nothing
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 07:28 pm
Salee Story

http://bravenewfilms.org/blog/8546-july-23rd-salee-story?play=1

brave enough?
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 09:35 pm
Torture, Anyone?
by Endymion 2007


I'm as guilty as the rest, of being afraid.

I don't particularly relish the thought of finding myself hanging upside down from a chain and being ridiculed, humiliated, beaten, tortured, sexually abused, perhaps murdered…

So how can I protest - when there is all this surveillance, phone tapping - e-mail interception - everyone's afraid to speak about it - to mention 'torture' … and why?

Because you never know who's listening…

Journalists, activists, people prepared to condemn inhumane acts, such as torture (and there by, the morals of their own governments) have a way of disappearing...
or being vilified. Some have been simply shot dead.

'They' (the companies, including much of the media, who have put together this fascist package) have allowed just enough of the atrocity to leak out to scare the **** out of their own citizens - what kind of scum are they?

To be honest, with nearly 9 million Iraqis in trouble or dead and the US doing arms deals with the biggest nation of torturers, I'm starting to feel that I don't give a f*ck who knows how I feel about this.

If '''''they'''''' are watching, listening, --- so f*cking what?? Let 'em.

Don't you see? They've made us all afraid to even talk about it. Too afraid to even discuss the rumours, let alone the evidence.

But it isn't going to go away
Not without a fuss
And lets face it if everybody started talking about it… if everybody spoke out - what could they do?
The majority of people in the USA - DO NOT agree with using torture. They are just gagged by fear.
What else could possibly be holding back their outrage?

It is immoral and loathsome and destructive and truly asking for trouble - to torture humans.
By doing so, we empower our real enemies with righteousness.

By doing so, we give up on ourselves.

Andrew Murray (Chairman of Stop The War in Britain) said he would wish to die, rather than have someone tortured to save him.

I totally agree. When we each die - it won't matter what the rest of the world thinks or has thought of us - because dying is alone.

I believe that at the end of the day, it will be ourselves that we must face.

0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 10:15 pm
The real tragedy of Iraq?
Andrew Murray

Never mind the death and destruction - damage to the cause of liberal interventionism is what worries one columnist.
May 8, 2007 3:00 PM | Printable version

"The Iraq war is a tragedy, above all, because of the damage it is inflicting on that cause of liberal interventionism," writes John Rentoul in the Independent on Sunday.

An interesting formulation, from the moral point of view. Imagine, for example that he had made a similar comment on the second world war, describing it as "a tragedy, above all, because of the damage it inflicted on the cause of nationalism".

Many of you might believe that the death of 650,000 civilians in Iraq (a figure acknowledged as plausible by the government's own experts) would rank as a greater tragedy than the puncturing of Rentoul's Gladstonian fantasies.

Or the failure of the war to resolve a single political problem in the Middle East - indeed, its exacerbation of them. Or the incitement of sectarian divisions in Iraq. Or the economic dereliction which persists after more than four years of occupation. Or the pointless deaths of British soldiers, accompanied by an evident demoralisation throughout the armed forces. Or the view of most people in Britain that our democracy was violated by the circumstances surrounding the decision to go to war.

But no, it is the passing of the ideology of "liberal interventionism" which we have most cause to regret, according to the Rentoul worldview.

Of course, Rentoul himself does not see it like that. He boldly asserts that "after Blair goes, the idea of a humanitarian, interventionist foreign policy will revive".

This may be doubted for a number of reasons. One is that the advocacy of interventionism, if it is to secure popular support, depends on more than simply the position of the prime minister. It also requires plausible propagandists in the press.

And who in the world is ever going to buy a case for war advanced by John Rentoul, Nick Cohen or David Aaronovitch again?

No, if Rentoul is serious about wanting to see the ideology of liberal imperialism rise like a phoenix from the ashes of Iraq he should do the decent thing and emulate Tony Blair by resigning, ceding his place in the commentariat to someone who may be believed in a future crisis.

Personally, I am happy for him to stay exactly where he is. In political argument, an already discredited opponent is a rare blessing.


http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/andrew_murray/
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 10:39 pm
http://archive.spiderednews.com/LeonKuhn/ScrapTrident.jpg


http://www.georgegalloway.com/
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jul, 2007 11:00 pm
Endymion, I hope you don't think this is to out of place here....but here it goes. (It's very good)

----------------------

Chief Seattle's Letter To All
THE PEOPLE
Chief Seattle, Chief of the Suquamish Indians allegedly wrote to the American Government in the 1800's - In this letter he gave the most profound understanding of God in all Things. Here is his letter, which should be instilled in the hearts and minds of every parent and child in all the Nations of the World:


CHIEF SEATTLE'S LETTER

"The President in Washington sends word that he wishes to buy our land. But how can you buy or sell the sky? the land? The idea is strange to us. If we do not own the freshness of the air and the sparkle of the water, how can you buy them?

Every part of the earth is sacred to my people. Every shining pine needle, every sandy shore, every mist in the dark woods, every meadow, every humming insect. All are holy in the memory and experience of my people.

We know the sap which courses through the trees as we know the blood that courses through our veins. We are part of the earth and it is part of us. The perfumed flowers are our sisters. The bear, the deer, the great eagle, these are our brothers. The rocky crests, the dew in the meadow, the body heat of the pony, and man all belong to the same family.

The shining water that moves in the streams and rivers is not just water, but the blood of our ancestors. If we sell you our land, you must remember that it is sacred. Each glossy reflection in the clear waters of the lakes tells of events and memories in the life of my people. The water's murmur is the voice of my father's father.

The rivers are our brothers. They quench our thirst. They carry our canoes and feed our children. So you must give the rivers the kindness that you would give any brother.

If we sell you our land, remember that the air is precious to us, that the air shares its spirit with all the life that it supports. The wind that gave our grandfather his first breath also received his last sigh. The wind also gives our children the spirit of life. So if we sell our land, you must keep it apart and sacred, as a place where man can go to taste the wind that is sweetened by the meadow flowers.

Will you teach your children what we have taught our children? That the earth is our mother? What befalls the earth befalls all the sons of the earth.

This we know: the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. All things are connected like the blood that unites us all. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.

One thing we know: our God is also your God. The earth is precious to him and to harm the earth is to heap contempt on its creator.

Your destiny is a mystery to us. What will happen when the buffalo are all slaughtered? The wild horses tamed? What will happen when the secret corners of the forest are heavy with the scent of many men and the view of the ripe hills is blotted with talking wires? Where will the thicket be? Gone! Where will the eagle be? Gone! And what is to say goodbye to the swift pony and then hunt? The end of living and the beginning of survival.

When the last red man has vanished with this wilderness, and his memory is only the shadow of a cloud moving across the prairie, will these shores and forests still be here? Will there be any of the spirit of my people left?

We love this earth as a newborn loves its mother's heartbeat. So, if we sell you our land, love it as we have loved it. Care for it, as we have cared for it. Hold in your mind the memory of the land as it is when you receive it. Preserve the land for all children, and love it, as God loves us.

As we are part of the land, you too are part of the land. This earth is precious to us. It is also precious to you.

One thing we know - there is only one God. No man, be he Red man or White man, can be apart. We ARE all brothers after all."


http://www.barefootsworld.net/seattle.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 1 Aug, 2007 04:25 pm
Hi Amigo - thanks for contributing - very apt too.
Apart from Black Elk, I haven't read very much Native American writings, but I'm sure that the answers to todays problems lie back somewhere in the pre- capitalist world.

The letter reminded me very much of a poem by a Vietnam Vet, Curt Bennett



UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD

The small bird chirped quietly,
From his barren branch.
He shuffled his feathers
And chirped again,
Proclaiming and establishing
His territorial rights.

Not a breeze
Stirred the empty clearing.
Like ghostly sentinels,
The battle-splintered trees
Stand their lonely vigil
On the silent outskirts.

The men lay still
In the rich, red mud
In awkward configurations.
It was difficult to tell
Which one belonged?
To which nation?

Their stiff arms
Seemed to stretch out
Reaching for each other.
It was almost, as if
Universal brotherhood
Had at last…been realized.



http://www.warpoetry.co.uk/vietnam.htm


peace
Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 1 Aug, 2007 05:57 pm
http://www.economist.com/images/cities/ldn/briefing/LivingstoneREUTERS.jpg

Livingstone fights 'stupid' Heathrow protesters ban


By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent
Published: 01 August 2007

Heathrow's owner, BAA, came under sustained attack from the Mayor of London and business leaders over poor facilities at the airport and plans to halt environmental protesters.

Ken Livingstone, launched a tirade against the Spanish-owned company's "breathtaking stupidity" for trying to ban from the London Underground millions of people who might join a protest camp next month.

Today, BAA will mount its High Court bid to allow police to prevent five million members of the National Trust, RSPB and other groups from joining the protest against Heathrow's plans for expansion. They would be banned from within 100 yards of any airport building, travelling on the Tube's Piccadilly line, parts of the M25 and M4, platforms 6 and 7 of Paddington Station and from taking the Heathrow Express.

Mr Livingstone said yesterday that, "someone there must be out of their skull" as he confirmed that Transport for London's lawyers would fight the Tube's inclusion in the action. The Mayor complained that protesters would also be banned from within 100 metres of all Transport for London property.

Speaking at a press conference, he argued that all the injunction had done was to increase the likelihood of hardcore protesters invading the Camp for Climate Action being held from 14 to 21 August.

"A small hard core of virtually professional protesters were planning to do the sort of thing they do at G8 and other places," Mr Livingstone said. "What BAA have done is guarantee massive coverage of what was going to be a minor encampment. Now it will undoubtedly be larger than it would have been."

Mr Livingstone also promised to fight plans for a third runway and gave a withering assessment of Heathrow, which has been criticisedfor delays, overcrowding and shabbiness.

"Certainly Heathrow does shame London," he told reporters. "It is typical of the English short-termism, lack of planning, lack of investment."

Sir Thomas Harrison, of Standard Chartered Capital Markets, complained that years of under-investment and poor planning had left Heathrow "unfit for purpose" and said executives would do, "almost anything" to avoid the airport. The Confederation of British Industry said the solution to the "strains" on Heathrow was to expand its infrastructure. BAA's plan to increase flights by 50 per cent with a new runway and increased capacity on the existing two is behind the planned protest by the Camp for Climate Action and Plane Stupid.

Seven hundred homes would have to be demolished to make way for the runway and local council leaders warn noise will greatly increase. BAA claimed that the problems at Heathrow had been caused by facilities being too small, with 68 million passengers passing through facilities built for 45 million.

A spokesman said: "In under six months time, with the opening of T5, the experience will be vastly improved and BAA's plans to transform Heathrow will be clear for all to see and experience."

BAA sought to reassure members of the public about the terms of the injunction. In a statement, it said: "Contrary to media reports, the injunction will not affect anyone lawfully travelling to and from Heathrow airport or lawfully engaged in activities at the airport."

Nick Blake QC is defending the four environmentalists named by the injunction. One of them, Joss Garman, of Plane Stupid, said airport expansion had to be halted to prevent climate change. "Whilst BAA can ask for an injunction to protect their profits - there is no law protecting the Amazon, the coral reefs or the glaciers," he said.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2823101.ece

**************************************************



Mr Livingstone said yesterday that, "someone there must be out of their skull"
- that's right...
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  0  
Reply Wed 1 Aug, 2007 06:39 pm
April 29, 2006
NEW YORK - Tens of thousands of protesters marched Saturday through lower Manhattan to demand an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, just hours after this month's death toll reached 70.


http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060429/060429_protest_vmed_1p.widec.jpg
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 1 Aug, 2007 08:18 pm
Great photo, Amigo

The BBC ignored the 100,000 demonstration in London on 18th March that year

http://ito.gn.apc.org/DemoinPiccadilly.jpg

For various reasons, it was hard for me to go and take part - but i did, and i'm glad.
Looking back on it, i remember how good it felt just to be with like-minded people -


A lot of built up stress just disappeared as i walked along... Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 33
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/17/2025 at 07:34:28