"What are we supposed to do with our Dead"
Odds n' Ends in the War on Terror
By Mike Whitney
07/17/07 "ICH" --- - Observations on unrelated facts from the weekly news
Part 1; Bush to Putin: "Let them eat cake"Part 2; Israel's Friends on the Hill
For readers who may have missed the recent events on Capital Hill, there was this interesting tidbit which appeared The Jerusalem Post:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1184168552181&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
"The US House of Representatives unanimously passed a resolution Wednesday afternoon condemning a British call to boycott Israeli universities. The measure, approved 414 to 0, urged the European Union and governments around the world to reject the call by the leadership of the University and College Union of the United Kingdom to cease cooperation with Israeli institutions".
Always nice to see diversity of opinion on these key humanitarian issues, isn't it? Congress has been equally supportive of the punitive measures which have prevented food and medicine from entering the Gaza Strip in clear violation of the Geneva Conventions.
Congress has no problem approving "collective punishment" or any other internationally-condemned behavior as long as it serves the greater interests of Israel. Ironically, you would never see such unanimity on any issue among the members of the Israeli Knesset.
Part 3; Iranian Jews would rather stay in Iran?!?Part 4; If Iran is Attacked, will anyone Help?
If the United States attacks Iran preemptively (a third carrier moved into the Gulf just last week) how would the other nations react?
We don't know---but we do know that the signatories of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty do have certain obligations. As Gordon Prather points out in his article "More Neocrazy Media Sycophancy" (antiwar.com)
"The [Sixth] Conference notes the reaffirmation by the nuclear-weapon states of their commitment to the United Nations Security Council resolution 984 (1995) on security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon states parties to the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons." (excerpt from the 2000 NPT Review Conference)
So, what does that mean?
As Prather says:
"Well, basically Russia and China, as well as France and the United Kingdom, will "provide immediate assistance" to Iran if it "is a victim of an act, or an object of a threat of, aggression in which nuclear weapons are used."
Interesting, eh? So if Bush-Cheney bomb Iran, the other NPT members are required under international law TO DEFEND IRAN. That might be worth a follow-up to see if they honor that commitment.
Part 5 ; Russia ReduxPart 6; Iran forces Japan to pay in yenPart 7; Iraqi Child Prostitution on the rise:Part 8; Another Journalist Killed in Iraq under suspicious circumstancesPart 9; Al Qaida: "They're Everywhere!"
In a White House speech this week, President Bush reiterated his pet fantasy that we are fighting "the same people" in Iraq who attacked the Twin Towers on September 11. This isn't a theme that Bush is likely to abandon as it provides the last, feeble justification for the ongoing-blitz in Iraq.
There was a good article in the LA Times by Ned Parker which helps to shed some light on the "miniscule" role of foreign fighters in Iraq.
Parker states: "Of the 19,000 "insurgents" held by the US military in Iraq, only 135 are foreigners."
In other words, al Qaida is just not a significant part of the so-called "insurgency". In fact, only 7% of detainees are foreign fighters.
The US is fighting a Sunni-led army of resistance in Iraq. They are not allied to Bin Laden or al Qaida.
So, which country is providing most of the foreign suicide bombers?
Saudi Arabia. (Although no one in the Bush administration has called for bombing Riyadh!)
Repeat: There is no significant cadre of foreign "al-Qaeda" fighters in Iraq
"Everything Bush and Cheney have said about the nature of the war and the supposed dangers of a US withdrawal is transparent falsehood."
http://www.juancole.com/
Is that like a lie?
Part 10; Bombs Away: Beefing up the air war
The Associated Press reported this week that the Air Force is building up its force-capability in Iraq. According to Charles Hanley, the Air Force "sharply stepped up bombing and laid a foundation for a sustained air campaign in support of American and Iraqi forces
.Squadrons of attack planes have been added to the in-country fleet. The air reconnaissance arm has almost doubled since last year. The powerful B1-B bomber has been recalled to action over Iraq.
"The night before last we had 14 strikes from B-1 bombers. Last night we had 18 strikes by B-1 bombers," Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch said approvingly of air support his 3rd Infantry Division received in a recent offensive south of Baghdad".
This tells us everything we need to know about Bush's future plans for Iraq. B-1 bombers are not used for pinpoint attacks on "terrorist strongholds". That's bullsh**. They are used for carpet-bombing and vast indiscriminate destruction which invariably causes massive civilian casualties.
The statistics confirm this assertion. There's been a fivefold increase of bombs dropped over the first half of 2006 which proves that civilian carnage has not deterred the military from trying to "pacify" the Iraqi people through vicious, unrelenting bombardment.
The article continues: "The Air Force sent a squadron of A-10 "Warthog" attack planes - a dozen or more aircraft - to be based at Al-Asad Air Base in western Iraq. At the same time it added a squadron of F-16C Fighting Falcons here at Balad." Air operations are constant with "more than 100 aircraft crisscrossing Iraqi air space at any one time."
As Bush is forced to reduce troop deployments, the "air surge" will continue into the foreseeable future---poisoning the country with depleted uranium, killing and maiming tens of thousands of civilians, and further reducing Iraq's infrastructure into rubble.
The Democrats fully support this bloody "scorched earth" policy.
Part 11; A Word from one of the Victims
Iraqi blogger and poet Layla Anwar manages to express what many of us feel about this ghastly war, but are unable to state in words. Here is a short passage from a recent piece called "Some Thoughts on Forgiveness" Layla Anwar)
http://arabwomanblues.blogspot.com/
"What are we supposed to do with our dead ones, our injured ones, our memories, our lost hopes, our vanished dreams? What are we supposed to do with our exile, our losses, our uprootedness?
Christ was crucified once. He was able to forgive.
But you are crucifying us daily.
So how do I forgive?"
God help us for what we have done to the Iraqi people.
Mike Whitney
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18022.htm