Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 01:46 pm
God, I need a drink
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 01:46 pm
just kiddin'
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 20 May, 2007 02:18 am
Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears

A senior police officer has said he fears the spread of CCTV cameras is leading to "an Orwellian situation".

Deputy chief constable of Hampshire Ian Readhead said Britain could become a surveillance society with cameras on every street corner.

He told the BBC's Politics Show that CCTV was being used in small towns and villages where crime rates were low.

Mr Readhead also called for the retention of some DNA evidence and the use of speed cameras to be reviewed.

His force area includes the small town of Stockbridge, where parish councillors have spent £10,000 installing CCTV.

Mr Readhead questioned whether the relatively low crime levels justified the expense and intrusion.

'Every street corner?'

"I'm really concerned about what happens to the product of these cameras, and what comes next?" he said.

"If it's in our villages, are we really moving towards an Orwellian situation where cameras are at every street corner?

"And I really don't think that's the kind of country that I want to live in."

There are up to 4.2 million CCTV cameras in Britain - about one for every 14 people.

The UK also has the world's biggest DNA database, with 3.6 million DNA samples on file.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6673579.stm
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 20 May, 2007 09:21 pm
http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/voodoochile.jpg


Michael Moore makes triumphant Cannes return with provocative documentary 'Sicko'

By Jill Lawless / Associated Press

CANNES, France --"Sicko," Michael Moore's attack on the U.S. health care system, got a warm welcome at Cannes Saturday that marked the director's triumphant return to the film festival and a respite from the controversy his work has started at home.

More than 2,000 people applauded loudly after the film's first Cannes screening at the packed Grand Theatre Lumiere, the main festival auditorium.

"I know the storm awaits me back in the United States," said Moore as he absorbed the enthusiastic response of critics and journalists.

The movie doesn't open until late June, but it has already been criticized by conservative politicians in the United States over scenes in which the filmmaker takes ailing 9/11 rescuers to Cuba for treatment.

"It's very much in the Michael Moore vein -- hilarious, but I was crying through about a third of it," said Peter Brunette of the Boston Globe.

The trip to Cuba led the Treasury Department to investigate Moore for possibly breaking the U.S. trade and travel embargo on the communist country. He could face a fine or jail time.

Some have said the investigation is giving the film free publicity. Not Moore.

"I'm the one who's personally being investigated, and I'm the one who's personally liable for potential fines or jail, so I don't take it as lightly," he said.

On the advice of lawyers, the filmmakers spirited a master copy of "Sicko" outside the United States in case the government tries to seize it. Asked whether the inquiry could prevent the film opening in the U.S. as planned on June 29, Moore said: "We haven't even discussed that possibility."

Moore is a Cannes favorite. His last film, the war-on-terror documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" won the festival's top prize, the Palme d'Or, in 2004. "Sicko" is screening out of competition -- Moore joked that he didn't want to appear like a "typical American" by greedily seeking another trophy.

Stephen Schaefer of the Boston Herald thought the film might do even better at the box office than the President Bush-bashing "Fahrenheit 9/11," which took $122 million in the United States.

"This could do even more," he said. "This is an issue that impacts more people. It's a huge issue."

In an online review, trade magazine Variety called it an "affecting and entertaining" film that "alternates between comedy, poignancy and outrage."

Moore said "Sicko" was actually meant to be a quieter and more reflective movie than the rabble-rousing "Bowling For Columbine" or "Fahrenheit 9/11."

There are no scenes of confrontation to match Moore's buttonholing of politicians in "Fahrenheit 9/11" to ask whether they would send their children to Iraq.

Instead, there are ordinary Americans telling heart-wrenching stories of being refused vital treatment. Moore also travels to Canada, Britain and France to take a look -- possibly rose-tinted -- at their systems of socialized medicine.

"I decided to make a different film this time," Moore said. "I wanted a different tone and I wanted to say things in a different way.

Moore said he hoped audiences would focus on the film's message, not the controversy.

"Why would we allow nearly 50 million Americans to go without any kind of health coverage," he said. "That's not America."

"After the screening, several hard-nosed U.S. critics and journalists admitted to crying during the film."
-- Wall Street Journal

"Brilliant and Uplifting"
-- FOX News

"Comedy, Poignancy and Outrage"
-- Variety

"Very Strong and Very Honest"
-- Stephen Schaefer, Boston Globe
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 21 May, 2007 11:52 am
Government breached own guidelines on arms exports, says report

Richard Norton-Taylor
Monday May 21, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

The Blair government has repeatedly breached its own guidelines on arms exports by selling weapons to countries with bad human rights records, according to a report by an independent thinktank.


Labour has tightened export controls on arms sales but it has flouted its own criteria, as the blocking of a Serious Fraud Office inquiry into BAE Systems deals with Saudi Arabia demonstrated, says the report by Saferworld.

The document was released today to mark 10 years since ministers first promised a foreign policy with an "ethical dimension" .

Article continues
In the three years up to 2006, arms exports were approved to 19 of 20 states identified as "countries of concern", including Colombia and Israel.

Measures introduced by the government give ministers the power to oversee and block exports, the report, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, acknowledges.

However, it says, they do not go far enough in controlling the licensing of British arms production in foreign countries, monitoring where British arms exports end up, and brokering by British arms dealers based overseas.

The government has increased its arms exports to both India and Pakistan despite guidelines saying it should not sell weapons to countries in unstable regions and where they might exacerbate existing conflicts, the report shows.

It says that open export licences - where there is no limit on arms sales - were approved to a number of countries with poor human rights records, including Egypt, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, and Turkey.

The report points out that Britain is the world's second largest exporter of arms, with the Blair government approving sales of £45bn worth of military equipment and services.

It also points out that the government argues that arms exports not only provide jobs but help to sustain arms companies and therefore some of the country's "key sovereign capabilities".

Saferworld says that the government exaggerates the significance of arms exports for British jobs.

It refers to studies that say that the number of people engaged in defence exports is less than 50,000, much less than the number of people who change jobs in any given month or two.

The report also shows how the government has used national security grounds to defend the sale of equipment which would otherwise breach its guidelines.

It says that when BAE Systems sold cockpit displays for US F-16 aircraft exported to Israel, Jack Straw, the then-foreign secretary, defended the deal on the grounds of "the importance of maintaining a strong and dynamic defence relationship with the US".

The report states: "A fundamental paradox lies at the heart of Labour's approach to arms exports: the government claims it has a foreign policy with an 'ethical dimension', yet there is no guarantee that such a policy wins the day when it comes to arms exports.

"Instead, as the cancellation of the SFO inquiry into BAE Systems' dealings with Saudi Arabia demonstrates, when push comes to shove, other interests appear to hold sway".

Today's report also estimates that arms exports are subsidised to the tune of at least £450m a year through government promotion, research and development.

Saferworld says that Gordon Brown's new administration should agree to tighter rules, including a "presumption of denial" for arms sales to countries of concern, implement fully international anti-corruption agreements and give parliament more control over the weapons trade.

Claire Hickson of Saferworld said: "The change in leadership presents an ideal opportunity for the government to redeem its ultimately disappointing record on arms exports."

Ethical? Some recent arms deals

· Between 1999 and 2006, the government licensed the export of £500m of military-related equipment to China, which is under an EU arms embargo

· In 2001, the government exported an air traffic control system to Tanzania which the World Bank said was unsuitable for the country's needs and was overpriced at £28m

· Britain has agreed to sell Saudi Arabia 72 Eurofighter aircraft in a deal worth an estimated £10bn

· British Scorpion tanks were used in demonstrations in which protestors were killed in Indonesia in 1998. The following year, the Indonesian air force flew British Hawk jets to intimidate the population of East Timor, which has since gained independence

· British arms worth more than £130m have been licensed for export to Iraq since the invasion in 2003

· The Labour government has licensed more than £110m worth of military equipment to Israel.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,,2084715,00.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 21 May, 2007 12:21 pm
Ah ****, man - this is not good

Britons To Be Watched By Autonomous Hovering Police Drones

That Britain suffers from rampant anomie, concealed by low murder rates, is arguable. That the place is becoming a police state isn't. The last laughable "measure" to be seen there was CCTV cameras which issue orders to passers-by. The next will be hovering drones, fitted with cameras, speakers and microphones, to hum around the streets, looking for criminals.

This isn't just a knock-eyed notion out of a some fascist think-tank, either: the first such civilian-surveillance drone will be deployed next week for a 12-week trial in Liverpool.

In essence, it's a Half-Life 2-style Manhack without the armored blades. The meter-wide device can hover up to 500m up, and is equipped with IR to gather evidence at all hours of night and day. They are completely autonomous, but operators can patch in to take manual control.


The FCC recently thwarted attempts to do the same here in the U.S.


http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/05/21/schnitter.jpg

http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/05/britons_to_be_w.html


Liverpool police get mini-Black Helicopter
Cyber-copters pack whisper mode, nightsight CCTV


The era of Robocop - and perhaps of the surveillance society - came a step nearer today with the announcement that Merseyside plods have started trialling a flying police robot.

The scally sky-patrolman, unlike military kill-bots such as the US Reaper, isn't intended for any active role. It is purely an observation platform, mounting CCTV with a range of imaging options.
Click here to find out more!

The Scouse law-enforcers' eye in the sky is the "hicam microdrone", a German battery-powered quad-rotor helicopter which weighs less than 1kg and is less than 1 metre in diameter, according to reports. The diminutive cyber-copter can apparently stay up for 20 minutes per battery charge and its UK distributors say that it is capable of "immediate deployment from car/dog van/other." YouTube footage is available here.

The microdrone apparently has a highly capable autopilot, making it much easier to fly than a normal remote-control helicopter.

A spokesman for the machine's UK distributor said "it is pretty much forward, back, left, right and record". Apparently, the microdrone is exempt from air-traffic restrictions in much the same way toy aircraft are. The autopilot can navigate GPS waypoints or hover autonomously, and is also capable of landing itself if the control signal is lost.

The flying robo-constable is also "almost silent" in use, and "allows entirely covert operation".

The UK distributor spokesman said the aircraft are "military derived...obviously I can't talk too much about that particular use...they are essentially reconnaissance tools."

Since the microdrone isn't listed among those used by the regular UK military, this might indicate that the British special forces have taken an interest in the diminutive stealth-chopper, perhaps in a counter-terrorism role. This would fit in with the Merseyside plods' reported plans to test it in firearms operations, as well as for more mundane tasks such as monitoring traffic congestion and crowds.

According to the Guardian, the spy drone will also "track criminals and record anti-social behaviour".

Given the aircraft's attributes, conspiracy theorists will be pleased to note that it seems to be available in just one colour: black.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/21/black_helicopters_over_merseyside/

1984? Try 2007 - and when there are police officers coming out in protest (see two posts back) - you bet your arse the rest of us need to worry.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 21 May, 2007 06:00 pm
QUESTIONS


How surreal can my world become?
Am I alone in feeling confused?
Is my country now really state-run?
Is freedom going to loose?
Is this the end of human rights?
Are we to be the slaves of a nation?
Where in this world is a leading voice
To guide us to salvation?
Where are brave men willing to speak?
Where are women of good intention?
Is this really the end of peace?
Or will someone stand up in contention?
Where is the anger? The righteous disgust?
Where is the indignation?
Will no one fight to stop the Right?
And protect a working-class nation?
This was Britain and could be again
They may be infected but we're still the same
We fought the nazis once
We can do it again
We won't stand by
And watch justice slain
But where are brave men willing to speak?
Where are women of good intention?
Is this really the end of peace?
Or will someone stand up in contention?




Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 May, 2007 10:13 am
The Buzz


I don't want a car
Microwaved dinner
Or a new f*cking telly
I don't want caviar
When kids in Africa
Got swollen belly
I don't want big brother
Or any other un-reality
I don't want the lies
That buzz like flies
Around this insanity
I don' t want a million
To see me through old age
I don't want celebrity
To keep me in a cage
I don't want your politics
Messing up my dreams
Peace is all I really want
For everyone and me



Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 May, 2007 10:55 pm
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/thumb_0522_03.jpg

Peace Fence
An improvised face lift for a chain-link barrier has led to a shifting display of nonpartisan peace banners

by John Darling

ASHLAND, Oregon - In the middle of an abandoned rail yard, on a chain-link fence surrounding a waste site, scores of peace posters have bloomed, the creation of a group of Ashland women who hope their work eventually makes its way to the fence around the White House.

Many of the 75 displays tied to the "peace fence" are scrawled with peace signs, doves and rainbows, and splashed with Vietnam-era slogans like "give peace a chance." Others approach toward art with images of animals, children, mothers and planet Earth.

"It's apolitical and seems to appeal to all political persuasions, no mention of candidates or political issues, just positive aspirations for the planet," says Nancy Bardos, one of the organizers.

Bardos' cloth art has Chinese symbols for peace, and reads, "Wars are based on the lies we tell ourselves about what is possible."

The display is the inspiration of Jean Bakewell, who was a child in England during the German bombings of World War II. Her daily trip to her favorite café took her past the 20-acre site, which was fenced off last year while awaiting cleanup of a century of industrial waste.

"I decided this fence of contention needed a face lift, so I called these characters (friends) and we started the display for Mother's Day," says Bakewell.

It is growing with new additions daily, she says, because "things look so black and people feel so helpless. This is a sign of hope. If we can do this, there's a way this can spread across the country and end up on the White House fence."

The group of seven older women are communicating with people in Eugene, Philadelphia and other cities where people are interested in creating their own peace fence. They're planning to make a Web site, contribute panels to displays in other cities and help with a how-to booklet.

"It's profound, very wonderful. I'm really taken aback. There's so much effort put into this," says Jolie Johnson of Talent, an onlooker who learned of the project by word-of-mouth. "We certainly need it."

The panels have grommets on the corners to withstand gusty winds, but several, including a picture of a penguin holding its chick, have disappeared.

"All the children wanted to have their pictures taken with it, so we think it went to a good home," says Kay Cutter, one of the organizers, who created it. "Still, it would be nice if they bring it back."

The art is scarcely visible from any public place. It's on land owned by the Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad, behind a row of businesses on A Street between 4th and 6th streets. People who want to see it have to walk between the buildings and cross the railroad tracks to see the exhibit against the backdrop of Grizzly Peak.

The women say they flash the peace sign at the few train engineers who come through.

CORP officials could not be reached for comment about the display.

"It was sort of a caper we did, like guerilla panel mounters at night, so it would be a surprise on Mother's Day," says Kate Geary, one of the organizers.

Most of the panels are from Ashland residents, but as word of the project spread around the Internet, panels arrived from other states, including one from a school class in Santa Rosa, Calif.

Although the art studiously avoids specific mention of the war in Iraq, organizer Nancy Parker says that conflict must have influenced the artists.

"I'm sure people create these panels with the war in mind and don't want to see it go on forever," she said, "but they also want to see their expressions be positive, not angry."

One dark panel, dominated by somber reds and blacks, has a gloved fist jutting out, holding a red rock and proclaiming the words of Buddha, "Holding anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else. You are the one who gets burned."

John Darling is a freelance writer living in Ashland. E-mail him at [email protected].

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/22/1374/
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 May, 2007 11:09 pm
Protesters acquitted of sabotaging US bombers

· Two claimed they were preventing war crimes
· They broke into RAF Fairford on eve of Iraq war


Richard Norton-Taylor
Wednesday May 23, 2007
The Guardian

Two protesters who broke into an RAF base to sabotage US B-52 bombers by clogging their engines with nuts and bolts were acquitted yesterday after arguing that they were acting to prevent war crimes in Iraq.

Toby Olditch, 38, and Philip Pritchard, 36, both from Oxford, expressed delight and relief after a Bristol crown court jury unanimously found them not guilty of conspiring to cause criminal damage at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire on the eve of the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

Article continues
Speaking outside the court after a verdict whose implications are potentially hugely significant for both the government and anti-war protesters, Mr Pritchard said: "I am delighted. It is a great relief - and a huge vote of confidence for anti-war protesters - that a jury were convinced that our actions were lawful."

He added: "This verdict sends out an important message."

Mr Olditch told the Guardian: "We are overjoyed and thankful for the good sense of the jurors and for the wonderful support we have received. But hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have suffered from the government's actions."

The two men, who came to be known as the B-52 Two, pleaded not guilty to conspiring to cause criminal damage when they tried to disable the bombers to prevent them from attacking Iraq. They argued that they acted to prevent damage to life and property in Iraq, and war crimes by aggressors. It was the second time they had been tried for the same offence. The first, in October 2006, ended in a hung jury, after 12 hours of deliberation spread over three days. Had they been convicted, they could have faced up to 10 years in jail. Two similar cases are awaiting re-trial, as a result of hung juries, at Bristol crown court.

The protesters argued that war crimes would be committed in the bombing as the B-52s carried cluster weapons - which scatter unexploded "bomblets" that kill and maim civilians. They argued that the aircraft were also armed with "bunker busting" bombs tipped with depleted uranium that fragments and spreads radioactive toxins harmful to civilians.

The prosecution conceded only that delaying the bombers would have prevented civilian casualties since it would have allowed people fleeing cities more time to escape.

The court heard that the pair entered the base on March 18 2003, the day before bombing commenced at the start of the Iraq war. They were armed with bottles of red and brown coloured liquid along with bags of nails and staples which would have been poured into the planes' engine bays. The pair were arrested after being spotted by patrolling Ministry of Defence police.

Before sending out the jury, Judge Tom Crowther said it was crucial to ignore wider issues relating to Britain's decision to go to war. "I remind you, you do not have to decide the legality of the decision to go to war."


http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,2086062,00.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 May, 2007 11:16 pm
America -- the world's arms pusher

No one is paying much attention to it, but our top export is the deadliest.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 22 May, 2007 11:23 pm
So now we've got two prime ministers - the lame duck and the lost soul. Time to change the system?


Blair's protracted when-will-I-go saga has been an insult not just to Labour but to the whole electorate

Marcel Berlins
Wednesday May 23, 2007
The Guardian

These next few weeks are going to be very bizarre. We have been educated to believe that this country's parliamentary system requires just one prime minister at a time. We now appear to have two - though, far from being a job share, it is more like a tug of war. One of them is a lame duck, but desperately clinging to life and still capable of doing a lot of harm, not least when he quacks for Britain for the last time at the G8 summit in Germany just before his expiry date. (Would it not be an apposite symbol of the handover fiasco - indeed, of the whole Blair-Brown soap opera - if, in his dying throes, he agrees to something that his successor is against?)

Article continues
The other one is behaving like a lost soul, wandering aimlessly around the country campaigning in an election that will not take place, setting out his stall in the knowledge that customers will have no choice but to buy his goods. He continues to practise his smile, even though it is no longer needed: there is no one he needs to persuade or attract - not at this stage anyway. An increasingly desperate media wants to know what he intends to do about this or that; he answers, knowing that nothing turns on his replies. I will be different, he says, but I will also be the same. There is an election elsewhere, for one of the most unnecessary jobs in western democracy, deputy leader of the Labour party.

I have no doubt that the antics surrounding the Brown succession (I won't use the word coronation, which usually denotes a joyous event, and is therefore inappropriate here) have added a further layer of public cynicism and discontent about our system of alleged democracy. I am not suggesting that there needs to be a full election each time a prime minister leaves office in mid-term, whether by death, ill-health or voluntary resignation. That would be too cumbersome and risk happening too often. But it was plain daft to create an electioneering process that lasts six weeks - longer than the period allowed in a general election - and then fail to provide an alternative scheme should there be no contest. It is not as if the possibility of Brown being given a clear run had not been foreseen and discussed.

But it has been the behaviour of Blair himself that has provoked the most ridicule and dissatisfaction. His protracted when-will-I-go saga has been an insult not just to the Labour party but to the electorate as a whole. It has diminished the reputation of our political structures at a time when they badly need bolstering.

The British problem is that the people - and particular the young - are losing respect for the democratic institutions and procedures that they are supposed to cherish and defend (to the death, if necessary). That gradual alienation manifests itself in a reluctance to vote. The 2005 general election managed a turnout of just 61%. The reasons for the cooling are complex and include inadequate education, a widespread feeling that the two main parties aren't sufficiently different to offer a clear choice, and a general disenchantment with politicians, especially those who run the country and seem anxious to whittle down the rights - and the people's participation - we normally associate with democracy.

More http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2086074,00.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 23 May, 2007 12:26 pm
Chagossians win right to go home

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/5/23/1_220319_1_5.jpg

The people of the Chagos Islands could be able to return to their homeland in the Indian Ocean after a victory in the British high court.
The Chagossians were removed from the archipelago more than 40 years ago when Britain granted the US permission to build an air and naval base on the largest atoll, Diego Garcia.

The court dismissed an appeal by the foreign office against their return, saying on Wednesday that the right to go home was "one of the most fundamental liberties known to human beings".

Providing the result is not challenged the islanders could return home as soon as they can arrange transport.

The court has refused to grant the government an immediate right of appeal, but the foreign office will be able to petition the House of Lords, the country's highest court, to review the case.

Diego Garcia has been used in US military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the British government has argued that it would not be right for the Chagossians to be allowed home because of security concerns.

Victory

Olivier Bancoult, chairman of the Chagos Refugees Group, who has lead the campaign to win the right to return, smiled as he emerged from court and held up his fingers in a victory sign.
He said his priority now was to go home as soon as possible and tend the graves of his ancestors.

"I'm very happy for my people," he told reporters. "It's always been my dream to go home and I will go. We will go back and we will live there and make Chagos great."

Two thousand Chagossians were forced to leave the islands, and resettled in nearby Mauritius and the Seychelles, in an operation that one US newspaper described at the time as an "act of mass kidnapping".

Roch Evenor, who left Diego Garcia with his parents when he was four-years old, said he was elated by the decision and hoped to return "within days".

Hard work

After 45 years away, he said the first thing he would do was "kiss the soil", but after that, the hard work would begin.

"Everything is depleted, everything is broken down," he said. "The cemetery is not well tended, and that is the first thing we must fix for our families and ancestors."

The Chagossians originally won the right to return home in 2000.

Robin Cook, the foreign secretary at the time, said the government would arrange for the Chagossians to return to the outer islands after a court victory, but in 2004 the government changed its mind and forbade anyone from having a right of abode on the islands.

Lord Justice Stephen Sedley said on Wednesday that the government had acted unlawfully in using its royal prerogative powers to make an Order in Council - not subject to parliamentary debate - to prevent the islanders from returning.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 23 May, 2007 12:30 pm
Congratulations to the people of the Chagos Islands, great news.

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/5/23/1_220317_1_3.jpg

"It's always been my dream to go home and I will go. We will go back and we will live there and make Chagos great"

Olivier Bancoult, chairman of the Chagos Refugees Group


The court dismissed an appeal by the foreign office against their return, saying on Wednesday that the right to go home was "one of the most fundamental liberties known to human beings".
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 23 May, 2007 12:47 pm


University of Virginia Student to March to DC Over 5 Days for Peace

Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2007-05-23 16:32. Activism

UVa Graduate Walks from Charlottesville to D.C. to Protest Iraq War

Controversial Commencement Address by Author John Grisham Helps Inspire Five Day Peace March


On Thursday, May 24th, Nicholas Kimbrell, a recent graduate of the University of Virginia, will begin a five day march from Charlottesville, VA to Washington D.C. to protest the war in Iraq. The walk will begin at UVa¹s storied Rotunda and end Monday evening at the White House.

Inspired by John Grisham¹s controversial commencement day speech to the UVa graduates of 2007, Kimbrell has chosen a Memorial March to illustrate his ­ and a majority of Americans¹ ­ steadfast opposition to the violence in Iraq. Grisham spoke of the "fifty-eight thousand boxes" that returned from Vietnam; and in his second of three lessons urged, "When politicians get the itch to go to war, don¹t believe what they say."

Recognizing that the time to challenge the Bush administration¹s initial claims to invade Iraq has long passed, Kimbrell has chosen to walk the hundred and twenty-five miles from Charlottesville to Washington to protest the war¹s continuation and escalation. "From the very beginning," argues Kimbrell, "this conflict has been mired in a web of falsity and deceit. We bear the responsibility to end this war ­ to end our participation in this poorly planned and improvised campaign of violence, to stop our military¹s little-supervised and wasteful spending, and to repair our nation¹s unprecedented fall from international grace."

Kimbrell, a co-founder of Virginia¹s Students for Peace in Iraq, hopes to demonstrate that beyond the daily sacrifices of our troops, their families, and the most devoted anti-war activists, all Americans must begin to talk, walk, and fight for peace. "We already have 3,422 boxes," says Kimbrell, "as nation of individuals we are directly responsible for each additional life ­ American and Iraqi ­ taken in this cataclysmic misadventure. As a recent graduate, I¹d like my first steps forward to be the small but difficult steps towards peace."

Kimbrell, born in New York City and raised in Arlington, VA, graduated with high distinction from the University of Virginia in 2006. On May 20th, he received his master's degree in English Literature. He plans to move to Beirut, Lebanon this fall.


http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/22821
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 24 May, 2007 12:26 am



The sorry plight of the refugee children


Paul Lewis
Thursday May 24, 2007
The Guardian

Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq live alone in a damp, terrace house in the western suburbs of Birmingham. The Afghan boys wake around 11am, skip breakfast, and usually spend the day watching children's television, sitting cross-legged on the floor in dim light that seeps though closed curtains.

They are young - 13, they say - and with no one to look after them they get by on a diet of oven chips, tinned tomatoes and ice cream. When the sun is out, they race across the local park, chasing a football with other refugee boys. Neither goes to school, although they attend college a few hours each week and receive occasional visits from social workers.

Article continues
The boys came to Britain from Afghanistan separately in the middle of last year, stowed in lorries.

Ramazan Ali is from Helmand province. His father, he says, was involved in a land dispute with the Taliban. Abdul-Khaliq Kharoti, in contrast, is from Baghalan province, the son of the commander of a pro-Taliban guerilla group. In their homeland they would be considered enemies.

But fending for themselves in their new home in the suburb of Smethwick, Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq only have each other. Thrown together, they have become best friends with a common grievance: Britain, they say, has added three years to their respective ages.

Lacking relevant documentation Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq have no idea how, why, when or even where they were assessed to be 16. Ramazan recalls telling an official that he was born on October 26, 1993. But he says when a social worker came to see him, he was told, on the spot, that he must be 16. His Home Office papers now state he was born in 1990. Abdul-Khaliq, who has lost all his documentation, said the same social worker told him to sign a piece of paper stating he was 16. "After that he comes to me and tells me to sign that paper, but I say no," he said.

The predicament of the two boys is far from unique. A report today will say that social workers are routinely disqualifying unaccompanied asylum-seeking children from foster care and school places by assessing them to be older than they actually are, meaning that potentially thousands of minors are neglected by under-resourced local authorities.

The report alleges that social workers are under pressure from managers to exaggerate children's ages, and concludes that a "culture of disbelief" pervades the system, with children as young as 13 denied adequate care because they are labelled too old, even when they present documentary evidence to support their stated date or birth.

"When you talk to asylum-seeking children, it's very difficult to work out how old they are," said Heaven Crawley, from Swansea University, who conducted the research for the Immigration Law Practioners' Association. "Often they look older because they've been through a lot more. The fact that it is cheaper and easier for an authority look after older teenagers means that there is an incentive to categorise vulnerable children as older."

She stressed that the problem stems from the Home Office "almost routinely" disputing the age of asylum-seeking children. Recent figures show almost half of asylum applications from under-18s separated from their parents are disputed by the immigration service. The figures are even higher for Afghan children: of the 4,448 that arrived between 2003 and 2006 and claimed asylum, almost 3,000 are believed to have been age-disputed.

The children's commissioner for England, Sir Albert Aynsley-Green, said: "It's unacceptable that in too many of these cases the authorities fail to give young people the benefit of the doubt. I have been moved and angered by how children describe the disbelief they often face - and how they fear the practical consequences of being treated inappropriately or as an adult. The stories they tell me are powerfully substantiated in this report."

The Home Office plans to use dental x-rays - accurate to within plus or minus two years of an estimated age - under plans unveiled in an consultation into the treatment of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children, due to end next week.

The result of Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq's age assessment has been far-reaching. Barred from a foster placement or attendance at a local school, the pair were initially placed in a hostel for over 16s before, they say, they were told they would be taken to live with a family. Instead they were driven to a house with mould on the walls and rubbish in the back garden, where they live unsupervised on £35 a week.

The future implications for the pair are graver still: both boys could be deported to Kabul late next year when - according to social services - they turn 18.

It is understood there are hundreds of teenage Afghan boys in and around Birmingham, the vast majority of whom were smuggled through Iran, Turkey and Europe in trucks. Invariably they arrive traumatised and in desperate need of help, but are left to reside in empty properties peppered around the outskirts of large cities.

Reza Sherahmad, an Afghan community worker in Birmingham, said dozens of Afghan boys have come to him seeking help. "It is common for them to say that Birmingham social services have given them artificial ages and they have been mistreated," he said. "How can these children know how to change a light bulb, use electricity or cook? It is dangerous leaving them alone in these houses." He is particularly concerned for the mental health of Afghan refugee boys, many of whom witnessed fellow stowaways - often brothers or cousins - die en route to Britain.

Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq admit they are haunted by their journeys, especially in their nightmares. Ramazan lost his family as they crossed a border on foot; rushing through a rough mountain terrain in the dead of night with hundreds of other refugees, they became separated in the chaos. "I was shouting, calling their names," he said. "Whenever I asked the smuggler [to help] he said be quiet, I will take you to your parents. I was crying. Some of them [fellow travellers or agents] were laughing. Others said: don't worry, we will take you to your parents."

Ramazan deduced the grey tarmac and tall buildings of Birmingham must be his final destination because there were no more lorries to climb into. He was left totally alone. "I have asked people to help find my family, but no one has helped," he said. "They could be in Birmingham."

Abdul-Khaliq had a similarly traumatic recollections from his journey, which was paid for by an uncle. His memories of the transit are hazy: "I went under trucks sometimes - I was in the air conditioning vent. Sometimes I was on top of the axle above the spare tyre. I had only seen these things in films." The worst moment, he says, came when he was held captive with other illegal stowaways by people-smuggling racketeers. They demanded money, claiming not to have been paid by an agent further along the smuggling route. Abdul-Khaliq was beaten - not too severely, he says - and watched as his co-captives had their fingernails pulled out. Others had ears sliced off. "They showed me the ear. They said: 'look, give us the money, look at this'. They were not beating me that much, but they were beating the older ones."

When the boys cannot sleep in the middle of the night , they creep downstairs to the living room to listen to borrowed cassettes of Afghan musical poetry that lie strewn across the living room floor. Ramazan and Abdul-Khaliq are desperate. They do not know where to turn for help.

"Thirteen year-olds in England are different," said Ramazan, as he heard the sound of children returning from school outside his closed window. "They smile and they laugh. I can only think of problems with my family, problems with me. I cannot smile."

Last night the boys were in the care of a fully-staffed children's home after the Guardian disclosed details of its investigation to Birmingham city council. "Children's safety is our paramount concern," a spokesman said. "We will be urgently looking into this case to check on the safety [of these boys] and look at their age assessment. If they are, as reported, 13, we will move them to more appropriate care. We also take allegations of poor practice by one of our social workers seriously and will launch an immediate investigation."

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/homeaffairs/story/0,,2086810,00.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 24 May, 2007 06:39 am
UK 'politics of fear eroding human rights'
By Nigel Morris, Home Affairs Correspondent
Published: 24 May 2007

Tony Blair's government has been condemned for exploiting the "politics of fear" by bringing in tougher anti-terror legislation, cracking down on asylum-seekers and allowing the prison population to soar.

Amnesty International condemned Britain's human rights record on an array of issues, from curtailing the free speech of anti-war protesters to failing to stand up to the US over the Guantanamo Bay prison camp.

It coupled a scathing assessment of this country's disregard for civil liberties with a challenge to Gordon Brown to show leadership by changing direction on human rights when he becomes Prime Minister.

In its annual report Amnesty said: "The Government continued to erode fundamental human rights, the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Measures taken with the stated aim of countering terrorism led to serious human rights violations and concern was widespread about the impact of these measures on Muslims and other communities."

The human rights group denounced the policy of deporting people to countries "with a history of torture or other ill-treatment" or placing them on control orders, which severely restrict their movements. It added: "Consequent judicial proceedings were profoundly unfair, denying individuals the right to a fair hearing."

Intelligence material was withheld from the suspects in the secret hearings that determined their fate and depended on a "particularly low standard of proof".

Amnesty also registered its alarm over the behaviour of police in anti-terror raids, including the shooting of an innocent man in Forest Gate, east London, last June.

It painted a bleak picture of the treatment of failed asylum-seekers who "through no fault of their own were condemned to live in abject poverty", and made clear its worries over last year's Immigration, Nationality and Asylum Act, which weakens refugees' UN protections.

Amnesty also attacked the prison service. It said Britain had one of the world's highest per capita imprisonment rates, adding: "Overcrowding continued to be linked to self-harm and self-inflicted deaths, greater risks to the safety of staff and inmates, and detention conditions amounting to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment."

Kate Allen, Amnesty's UK director, said: "Gordon Brown should reject the politics of fear and show principled leadership which respects human rights and upholds the rule of law.

"The UK should use its influence on the world to encourage others to put policy based on fear aside. If the UK is to be credible in this, it must have its own house in order by having a humane asylum policy and counter-terrorism measures that do not undermine basic human rights protections."

She suggested that Mr Brown should call for the closure of Guantanamo Bay and order a full investigation into allegations that British officials have colluded in the CIA kidnapping terror suspects and transporting them around the world for interrogation.

Irene Khan, Amnesty's secretary general, called on Mr Brown to take an international lead to find a solution to the Darfur conflict, which she described as a "bleeding wound on the world's conscience".

She said the US had lost much of its authority in the world as a result of its security policies. "There is great suspicion about the US's intentions now. It is a powerful country and it is sad to see that has been squandered, making it impotent as a force for human rights."

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article2578468.ece
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 24 May, 2007 09:52 pm
http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/pict13.jpg
Heroes Square in central Budapest, Hungary

http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/pict53.jpg
Fayetteville, N.C, USA

http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/pict29.jpg
Maronia Park in Seoul

http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/pict15.jpg
Baghdad, Iraq,

http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/pict59.jpg
Chicago, USA

http://www.hellblazer.com/media/iraq-kill-44/index.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 May, 2007 06:39 am
US congress approves war funding

The Democratic-controlled US congress has approved $95 bn in new funds for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without any timetable for withdrawing troops.

The senate voted 80-14 to send the compromise measure to the president after the House of Representatives cleared the measure 280-142, with Republicans supplying the bulk of the votes.

Besides abandoning their plan for a troop withdrawal timeline, Democrats gave up on attempts to insert provisions to require the Pentagon to adhere to troop training, readiness and rest requirements.


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/A86FC9C2-A98D-44B5-BA29-B4A004C3A945.htm


Well, my goodness! They've done it again, haven't they? For the who knows how manyth time, the Democrats in Congress have cheerfully provided to the American people the undeniable proof of their pathetic cowardice and timidity. Once again they have chosen political expediency over statesmanship. The amazing thing is the fact that after thoughtlessly giving this disgusting, murderous commander-in-chief a free ticket to send the servicemen and women of this country - not to mention the people of Iraq - on a hay ride straight into the pit of hell, they stupidly stood in front of the press, disingenuously consoling each other on how they tried to do the right thing for the country they profess to love so much. Huh???? Keith Obermann, on target as usual, called it their "Neville Chamberlain moment". How stupid do these people think we are?

I left the Democratic party almost eight years ago in utter, bitter frustration at their abandonment of the ideals of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal. Every once in a while I would reflect back on that decision and wonder aloud whether I had done the right thing; that maybe I should come back into the fold. Yesterday, they merely reinforced my decision. The Democrats have proven themselves, yet again, irrelevant. Maybe Ralph Nader was right: they really are nothing more than Tweedle Dum to the GOP's Tweedle Dee. Oh! And speaking of Ralph Nader.....The party's "base" is as angry as they've been since their leadership nominated Hubert Humphrey over the vehemently anti-war Eugene McCarthy in the late summer of 1968. And yet it's not too late for the Dems to pull themselves out of the mess they have helped to engender. It's now painfully obvious that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are not going to do the people's will. It's up to the so-called "Young Turks" within the party apparatus to make damn good and sure that Pelosi and Reid are thrown into history's waste basket and that new leadership is provided as soon as possible. Otherwise, they can count on a third party uprising next year.

Did these people not understand the message we sent them in November? Apparently not. The reason we sent them to Washington was not to guarantee their re-election next time around; we sent them there to end this mind-fuckingly stupid war in Iraq. What part of that message didn't they get? Before this obscenity is over, a hundred thousand - or more - men, women and little children will end up getting slaughtered for no reason at all. Don't they realize that doing everything humanly possible to end this war will benefit them in long run? Not only at the polls in November of '08 but in the pages of history!

Tuesday will mark the 90th anniversary of the birth of one of the icons of the Democratic party, John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Have not one of these crybabies even read his Pulitzer Prize winning 1956 book, Profiles In Courage? Maybe they should. Maybe we all should read it. The great senator from Wisconsin, Russ Feingold (a courageous senator if there ever was one) put it inperfect context yesterday when he said that, "the desire over political comfort won-out over real action"...."Action".... That was a word that Jack Kennedy and Franklin Roosevelt were both prone to use. The Democratic party is in desperate need of people who are going to act. For that, new leadership is required - IMMEDIATELY.

George W. Bush does not need an enabler; he had that for six years with a sycophantic, rubber stamp Republican congress that bent itself backwards to his every stupid and reckless whim - and look where it's gotten us!. The American people sent that Congress, the 109th, packing last November. This president, this hideous, half-witted little thug needs to be put in check - he needs to be stopped. If the current Democratic leadership is not going to put a stop to this insanity, someone has to be found who will end it. And if that leadership is not to be found among the ranks of the party of FDR, I'm afraid that "the base" will once again be forced to seek the answers to the problems facing America from within a third party. We cannot afford to take that risk again.

It's hard not to be reminded of Robert F. Kennedy and Eugene McCarthy in times like these. Although they were bitter rivals for the 1968 nomination, neither man was ambivalent as far as their opinions regarding another immoral and unpopular war. The stand they took against the Viet Nam almost forty years ago - against the foolish ambitions of Lyndon B. Johnson, a president from their own party - was at great risk to their respective political careers - but they took that stand and never looked back - indeed, Kennedy's campaign would cost him his life. Does that sort of courage even exist any longer?

No question about it: the American poltical landscape is in dire need of new leaders. Franklin Roosevelt, Gene McCarthy, Jack and Bobby Kennedy are dead and they're not coming back.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY


http://tomdegan.blogspot.com/
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 25 May, 2007 06:40 pm
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/5/25/1_220489_1_2.jpg

Israel continues Gaza air strikes

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/CFC4E4A1-DBB8-4740-9955-7B40526EED82.htm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 25
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/18/2025 at 05:00:43