1
   

Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'

 
 
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 05:14 am
Quote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sitelogos/Guardian.gif

Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'

Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday August 14, 2006
The Guardian

The US government was closely involved in planning the Israeli campaign in Lebanon, even before Hizbullah seized two Israeli soldiers in a cross border raids in July. American and Israeli officials met in the spring, discussing plans on how to tackle Hizbullah, according to a report published yesterday.

The veteran investigative journalist Seymour Hersh writes in the current issue of the New Yorker magazine that Israeli government officials travelled to the US in May to share plans for attacking Hizbullah.

Quoting a US government consultant, Hersh said: "Earlier this summer ... several Israeli officials visited Washington, separately, 'to get a green light for the bombing operation and to find out how much the United States would bear'."

The Israeli action, current and former government officials told Hersh, chimed with the Bush administration's desire to reduce the threat of possible Hizbullah retaliation against Israel should the US launch a military strike against Iran.

"A successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign ... could ease Israel's security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American pre-emptive attack to destroy Iran's nuclear installations," sources told Hersh.

Yesterday Mr Hersh told CNN: "July was a pretext for a major offensive that had been in the works for a long time. Israel's attack was going to be a model for the attack they really want to do. They really want to go after Iran."

An unnamed Pentagon consultant told Hersh: "It was our intention to have Hizbullah diminished and now we have someone else doing it."

Officials from the state department and the Pentagon denied the report. A spokesman for the National Security Council told Hersh that "The Israeli government gave no official in Washington any reason to believe that Israel was planning to attack."

Hersh has a track record in breaking major stories. He was the first to write about the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and has written extensively about the build-up to the war in Iraq. He made his name when he uncovered the massacre at My Lai during the Vietnam war. Most recently he has written about US plans for Iran, alleging that US special forces had already been active inside the country.

Guardian Unlimited



"even before Hizbullah seized two Israeli soldiers"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 660 • Replies: 17
No top replies

 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 06:05 am
Was this before or after Hizbullah started raining rockets down on Israeli civilians for the past couple of years?

The thing about war plans is that there are tons of them on shelves in the Pentagon. That is what generals do, it is what they are paid to do. They make plans for war in case they are ever needed. I'm sure if you were allowed to look through the shelves you would find plans to attack Canada and even Mexico. Hell you might even find plans to attack the UK.

Coming to the US for help in planning an attack into the ME doesn't suprise me in the least. Who else has had experience in the last decade in doing so? That would be the US.

Have you even been in the military f4f?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 06:11 am
Quote:


Is this the type of thing you support in order to get rid of Isreal?
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 06:11 am
Quote:


Source

Is this the type of thing you support in order to get rid of Isreal?
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 12:21 pm
Baldimo wrote:
Was this before or after Hizbullah started raining rockets down on Israeli civilians for the past couple of years?

The thing about war plans is that there are tons of them on shelves in the Pentagon. That is what generals do, it is what they are paid to do. They make plans for war in case they are ever needed. I'm sure if you were allowed to look through the shelves you would find plans to attack Canada and even Mexico. Hell you might even find plans to attack the UK.

Coming to the US for help in planning an attack into the ME doesn't suprise me in the least. Who else has had experience in the last decade in doing so? That would be the US.

Have you even been in the military f4f?


The most disturbing thing about this report is that it is the analysis of a distinguished journalist suggesting the wholesale slaughter of up to a thousand Lebanese civilians was simply a military exercise pre-planned in cold blood months ago.

When you have two Israeli soldiers captured and an offensive springing up immediately afterward with Israel saying it's responding to Hezbollah aggression and just out to get the soldiers back safe etc. etc. it generates a degree of sympathy for Israel - "Hey, they might be destroying Lebanon, but they are just defending themselves etc. etc." When the US then comes in and holds negotiations it makes them look like they're trying their best - "Bush is out there trying to pick up the pieces of someone else's mess!".

... but all that changes if you know it's a pre-planned attack. Then you have an Israel just waiting for any old excuse for a war - even creating an excuse for destroying southern Lebanon. And then you have a US who is just playing a cynical part, having already agreed to let the assault of Lebanon go ahead, it just goes through the motions of seeming to give a damn.

If Hersh is correct then there is also a repercussion for other conflicts - it makes Dick Clarke's claim of the deaths of civilians at 9/11 being callously used as an excuse for Wolfowitz and co. to implement their pre-conceived Afghanistan invasion plans much more credible and suggests an administration that is keen to create fictions and facades to justify all sorts of military actions - even those that are not in their country's interests or the interests of humanity.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 01:07 pm
Baldi, i'm disappointed that you watch Fox News. Sad
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 03:14 pm
freedom4free wrote:
Baldi, i'm disappointed that you watch Fox News. Sad


I'm deployed right now in Afghanistan and this is just one of the websites that I pick my news up on. Don't be to disappointed, I am a conservative Independent who voted for Bush. When home I try to catch all the news channels including CNN and MSNBC.
0 Replies
 
Atavistic
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 08:17 pm
Re: Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'
freedom4free wrote:
Quote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sitelogos/Guardian.gif

Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'

Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday August 14, 2006
The Guardian

The US government was closely involved in planning the Israeli campaign in Lebanon, even before Hizbullah seized two Israeli soldiers in a cross border raids in July. American and Israeli officials met in the spring, discussing plans on how to tackle Hizbullah, according to a report published yesterday.

The veteran investigative journalist Seymour Hersh writes in the current issue of the New Yorker magazine that Israeli government officials travelled to the US in May to share plans for attacking Hizbullah.

Quoting a US government consultant, Hersh said: "Earlier this summer ... several Israeli officials visited Washington, separately, 'to get a green light for the bombing operation and to find out how much the United States would bear'."

The Israeli action, current and former government officials told Hersh, chimed with the Bush administration's desire to reduce the threat of possible Hizbullah retaliation against Israel should the US launch a military strike against Iran.

"A successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign ... could ease Israel's security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American pre-emptive attack to destroy Iran's nuclear installations," sources told Hersh.

Yesterday Mr Hersh told CNN: "July was a pretext for a major offensive that had been in the works for a long time. Israel's attack was going to be a model for the attack they really want to do. They really want to go after Iran."

An unnamed Pentagon consultant told Hersh: "It was our intention to have Hizbullah diminished and now we have someone else doing it."

Officials from the state department and the Pentagon denied the report. A spokesman for the National Security Council told Hersh that "The Israeli government gave no official in Washington any reason to believe that Israel was planning to attack."

Hersh has a track record in breaking major stories. He was the first to write about the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and has written extensively about the build-up to the war in Iraq. He made his name when he uncovered the massacre at My Lai during the Vietnam war. Most recently he has written about US plans for Iran, alleging that US special forces had already been active inside the country.

Guardian Unlimited



"even before Hizbullah seized two Israeli soldiers"


so what?
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 02:01 am
Re: Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'
Atavistic
Quote:


so what?


It's all fairly simple, really. The allegation is that Israel planned to attack/invade Lebanon and was planning this two months ago with the US.

Now, the only question we need to ask ourselves is "Is this incompatible with Hezbollah abducting two Israeli soldiers and things proceeding from there?". The answer is clearly "No". *IF* Israel had cooked up plans with the US to attack and destroy southern Lebanon two months ago, then all it needed from there was a casus belli or a cause to implement those plans. It could have just moved unilaterally, but this would have been particularly unpopular - so Israel needed an 'excuse'. That excuse came in the kidnapping of the Israeli soldiers.

So there's where we are so far. Now Hersh says the US was in on it because it thought the invasion might be a "pretext for a major offensive". How does this work? Well, an invasion of Lebanon brings into play Syria and Iran. Bush has already started saying "Iran/Syria/Hezbollah - they're all the same thing". You get an escalation of tensions which gives you more and more impetus for future action against Iran... This bit of the jigsaw is yet to be confirmed in any way, of course - but I'm just talking about what Hersh is predicting.

Hersh's thesis is not particularly surprising really, as in the 'Age of Diplomacy' every second war or so has been started by either manufacturing or anticipating a casus belli and planning in advance for a gigantic response to any meagre action. What Israel has done here is hardly 'Gulf of Tonkin' sneaky, but the story is still significant.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 04:08 am
f4f,
You avoided the question.

Have you ever been in the military?
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 04:32 am
mysteryman wrote:
f4f,
You avoided the question.

Have you ever been in the military?


NO, i have NOT been in the militery, what has that got to do with this topic ?

Anyway, i don't want to end up like you.

You did say, your right arm was blow up, riight ?

mysteryman, do you have problems masterbating ? Laughing
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 10:28 am
Quote:
NO, i have NOT been in the militery, what has that got to do with this topic ?


It has to do with the fact that you don't understand military planning. They don't just come up with these things on a moments notice. There have always been plans and there will always be plans. Just because they have them doesn't mean they are going to use them. This do have to be changed in them due to different things like troops strength, available hardware, weather and even new technolgies. Because you have never been in the military you don't have an understanding of this.

Quote:
Anyway, i don't want to end up like you.

You did say, your right arm was blow up, riight ?


Not everyone who enters military service ends up hurt. You could go to work tomorrow and get in a car accident and loose an arm or a leg. There are more dangerious things out there then deployments. Been around a few mortar and rocket attacks the last few months and they don't even bother be any more.

Quote:
mysteryman, do you have problems masterbating ?


Don't you think that is a little cruel and uncalled for? If he did have an arm gone is it nice to pick on those who have been hurt? Or does it bring you joy to pick on those who have problems you don't?
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 11:03 am
Baldimo
Quote:
It has to do with the fact that you don't understand military planning. They don't just come up with these things on a moments notice. There have always been plans and there will always be plans. Just because they have them doesn't mean they are going to use them. This do have to be changed in them due to different things like troops strength, available hardware, weather and even new technolgies. Because you have never been in the military you don't have an understanding of this.


Are you talking about a 'contingency plan' ?, if so, then it is something that is generally evolved to be put into force in response to an event that wasn't likely or anticipated. It's a 'backup' plan or a 'plan we wouldn't expect to ever use, but make just in case'. So, the allegation from Hersh isn't that Israel had a 'contigency' plan at all, nor that its plan was 'contingent' on anything.

There is nothing much 'practically' in a plan of where to strike in Lebanon or how to invade or what munitions to use that is at all contingent on Lebanon having 'struck first' so to speak. There is also nothing much 'contigent' in a plan for a set of circumstances most believed would come about.

The Israeli/US plan was allegedly a plan of attacking Lebanon.

'Contingency plan' is just an 'excuse'.

As people are well aware, the chances of an attack by Hezbollah on Israeli interests some time in 2006/7 was actually quite high, so the idea of Israel drawing up anticipatory plans for such an attack is not at all unreasonable. As we've seen, even the capture of two soldiers was enough of an attack to merit the response of war (ie. the fruition of these plans, if Hersh is correct).

just as the allegation is that Afghanistan plans were on the backburner until an excuse to implement them came about (9/11), I believe the allegation here is similar: that Israel was drawing up plans with the US two months in advance to decide what it might do given free range to attack Lebanon. The excuse for the attack came two months afterwards.

Quote:
Not everyone who enters military service ends up hurt. You could go to work tomorrow and get in a car accident and loose an arm or a leg. There are more dangerious things out there then deployments. Been around a few mortar and rocket attacks the last few months and they don't even bother be any more.


Yes, but it is only worth risking your life to defend your country, not to make the rich filthy rich. What you are fighting is an 'illegal war'.

With the amount of hi-tech/nuclear weapons we have, the 'risk of an attack' is very unlikely for a very long time.

You are dying for no apparent cause.


Quote:
Don't you think that is a little cruel and uncalled for? If he did have an arm gone is it nice to pick on those who have been hurt? Or does it bring you joy to pick on those who have problems you don't?


Yeah, come to think of it, it is cruel, but then killing well over 100,000 Iraqi's for no apparent reason, is also cruel.

Here's something for you to read:

Quote:
THE SCIENCE OF CREATING KILLERS
What exactly does it take to kill someone? Here's how 21-year-old West Texas Army Pvt. Steven Green described shooting a man who refused to stop at an Iraqi checkpoint: "It was like nothing. Over here, killing people is like squashing an ant. I mean, you kill somebody, and it's like, 'All right, let's go get some pizza,' " he told the military newspaper Stars & Stripes.

n February, the soldier's comments struck embedded correspondent Andrew Tilghman as unremarkable, a reflection of the fact that he and Green were immersed in the treacherous hellhole of Mahmoudiya, at the edge of what GIs have dubbed the Triangle of Death. Green's statements didn't even make it into the Stars & Stripes article, which ran earlier this year.

It was only recently -- when the honorably discharged soldier appeared in federal court pleading not guilty to the rape of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl and the cold-blooded murder of her family -- that Tilghman recalled the quotes with a newfound chill...

sfgate
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 12:15 pm
Baldimo and Mysteryman, please stop feeding the trolls.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 12:30 pm
http://images6.theimagehosting.com/mm.d48.JPG
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 12:42 pm
Sean Hannity, Pouting Over Middle East Cease-Fire: "One Nuke And It Was All Over" http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/August2006/150806Hannity.htm
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 12:44 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
Sean Hannity, Pouting Over Middle East Cease-Fire: “One Nuke And It Was All Over” http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/August2006/150806Hannity.htm


Someone needs to hang that dude by his ball's.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2006 07:39 pm
freedom4free wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
f4f,
You avoided the question.

Have you ever been in the military?


NO, i have NOT been in the militery, what has that got to do with this topic ?

Anyway, i don't want to end up like you.

You did say, your right arm was blow up, riight ?

mysteryman, do you have problems masterbating ? Laughing


No,
I never said my right arm was blown up.
I DID however,lose two fingers on my right hand,trying to save the lives of a woman and her child in Iraq.
I dont begrudge the loss,nor do I regret it.
I accomplished what I was trying to do,and IMHO the price was worth it.

BTW,I have been left handed my entire life,so no I dont have any trouble masterbating.
But,usually my g/f does that for me,its much more enjoyable that way.
But I doubt if you know anything about that.

Baldimo,
I survived a few mortar and rocket attacks in Afghanistan also.
The rockets always scared me because they were so innacurate,but at least you could hear them coming,usually.

All I can say is keep your head down,and if you need to cut the buttons off your shirt to get down even more,you have my permission.

Of course,since you are in the army,you will need to find someone to do it for you,because I know you guys arent allowed any sharp objects...LOL

Anyway,this marine says watch your ass,and always have a hole to hide in when the mortars start.

SEMPER FI
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush 'helped Israeli attack on Lebanon'
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/21/2025 at 09:51:52