1
   

Govenors criticize national energy policy

 
 
Reply Tue 8 Aug, 2006 09:08 am
Govs. criticize national energy policy
By ROBERT TANNER, AP National Writer
Mon Aug 7, 2006

Governors worried about damage to the economy and complained about years of neglecting energy policy after an Alaska oil field shutdown, but offered far different solutions on Monday.

Energy independence and alternative fuels had already been part of the weekend's summer meeting of the National Governors Association. News of the oil field shutdown and the spike in oil prices, spurred by corrosion of a key oil pipeline, put a sharper edge to the topic.

Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana, whose state is at the center of the nation's fuel production and distribution, criticized the federal government's monitoring of critical infrastructure.

"From our perspective in Louisiana, our wetlands are disappearing and it's exposing our network of pipelines," she said. "That's potentially putting our whole infrastructure at greater risk." She said local development and pollution also spurs erosion, but said more federal involvement is needed.

Republican Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi said the problem was environmentalists and others who fight increased drilling and pipeline construction.

"We need supply to grow. That means more drilling like (proposals to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), more nuclear energy, more coal to liquid," he said. "We see how the shortsightedness of not-in-my-backyard resistance can cause enormous reduction in supply, which is going to result in higher prices."

Governors from both parties said the disruption would hopefully spur a willingness to tackle a more ambitious approach to energy.

"Our energy policy for the last 30 years is a joke. We've been asleep at the switch, both Republicans and Democrats," said Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, who has been pushing alternatives such as ethanol and wind energy at home.

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, said the disruption only strengthens his argument for a federal energy policy that would encourage greater investment in coal to produce synthetic fuels. He had earlier laid out a plan where Montana coal could replace more than half the foreign oil imported each year.

"We've got the solution but we've got to move. We've got to have a balanced portfolio of fuels," he said.

Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano of Arizona said she was waiting to hear more to understand the wider impact. "It's just further confirmation of the fact that we need a national energy policy. It's further confirmation that our continued dependence on foreign oil is a problem."

Republican Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina said that if the disruption lasted so would higher prices, given the rapid escalation in prices over the last year and the latest Mideast instability.

"It's sort of wrong time, wrong place," he said.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 146 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Aug, 2006 09:53 am
I can not help but think that part of the pipeline problem is a lack of maintenance. That's unforgiveable.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 08:59 am
BBB
plainoldme wrote:
I can not help but think that part of the pipeline problem is a lack of maintenance. That's unforgiveable.


The pipe line scandal is finally seeing the light of day. It turns out that the Congress also is to blame. When they approved the drilling for oil and the pipe line in Alaska, the Congress failed to establish maintenance standards and enforcement.

BBB

Aug. 8, 2006, 8:23PM
BP's blues
Failure to adequately maintain vital North Slope oil link is the oil giant's latest blunder



Since the explosion at BP's Texas City refinery that killed 15 workers last spring, the company has been on a roll, with almost all of the motion downhill. Now consumers are paying the penalty as corroded pipelines operated by BP from Alaska's massive Prudhoe Bay field have been shut down for emergency repairs. The field provided 8 percent of domestic oil production, and the cutoff could could cause gasoline prices to spike 10 cents or more at the pump.

The problem could have been foreseen and dealt with in a less disruptive manner had the pipelines been adequately maintained. The widespread corrosion was discovered by the operator only after federal regulators ordered it to inspect the lines following the worst pipeline breach since pumping operations began there in 1977.

BP says it will replace 16 miles of corroded pipeline. The cutoff of Prudhoe oil could last for months.

BP officials concede a so-called smart pig maintenance device, which can detect sludge and corrosion, had not been used to inspect the lines since the company took over operations in 1992. BP apparently tried to use one in 1998, but it was blocked by sludge. Oilfield experts say the larger Trans-Alaskan Pipeline is tested monthly. BP relied on ultrasound testing that failed to pinpoint accumulating sludge and corrosion.

The shutdown was triggered by the discovery of a small oil leak in one line. However, in March another corroded line operated by BP spilled 267,000 gallons of oil onto the frozen tundra. Federal law enforcement agents are investigating the incident.

In addition to those problems and the Texas City refinery disaster, BP was embarrassed by U.S. regulators' charges that company propane traders had tried to illegally manipulate the market in 2004.

BP North America Chairman Bob Malone expressed his company's regrets for the shutdown at an Alaskan press conference, saying "on behalf of the BP Group, I apologize for the impact it is having on the nation and the state of Alaska." BP's chief executive, John Browne, was already in Alaska on an image-mending visit when the Prudhoe shutdown was announced.

Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee expressed outrage that BP had not taken measures to protect U.S. energy security. "It is appalling that BP let this critical pipeline deteriorate to the point that a major production shutdown is necessary," said the ranking Democrat on the committee, John Dingell of Michigan. U.S. environmental officials also said they were concerned with the company's progress in inspecting its pipelines.

BP's advertising portrays the company, whose U.S. operations are based in Houston, as environmentally sensitive, safety-conscious and committed to investing in alternative forms of energy. BP's self-praise is being overwhelmed by its chronically disastrous performance on the ground.

If BP expects to enjoy the confidence of its American customers, it needs to start solving its problems before they reach the stage where apologies, fines and funerals are necessary.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 09:01 am
BBB
Congress is finally getting around to establishing pipe line maintenance standards (see below link). Nothing was done until the March 2006 oil spill. ---BBB

http://petrochemical.ihs.com/news-06Q3/phmsa-pipeline-testing.jsp
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Aug, 2006 10:09 am
BBB -- Thanks for the story. It seems that maintenance is always forgotten.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Govenors criticize national energy policy
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 02:14:37