1
   

Number of Children had and quality of life

 
 
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 06:29 pm
by Paul Andrew Bourne


Fertility of the woman (Number of children had)


Some people argue from a purely economic perspective that the larger the number of children a female has, the less likely it is that she will be healthier, and this is from the premise of socio-demographic conditions of child rearing and the socio-economic cost of the process. It may appear simplistic from one to believe that associated with childbearing is the reality of psychosocial condition of the state of the child and the family, and accompanying this is the biomedical conditions which are usually accepted as given. On the contrary, some people conceptualize childbearing as a vehicle of social mobility, and some consider their offspring as material resources in their old age. Within the psyche of the poor, poverty alleviation is seen through the investment in child/ren, and this some people see as investing in stocks, bonds, shares or other physical assets.

Studies from the RAND Center for the Study of Aging (1998) confirm some of the epistemological beliefs of people in our society. The institute have carried out research that show "Childbearing has often been thought to have a beneficial effect on a woman's health, primarily because it reduces the risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer", which concretize some the common sense thoughts of people on well-being and childbearing. A crucial issue that needs mentioning is how the RAND's study highlights the non-socio-demographic benefits of childbearing. Coupled with this is the frequency of medical care to which the new mother is likely to see, thereby ensuring that she seeks health care.

The study appears to be emphasizing the wholesale advantages of childbearing, but researchers at RAND discovered that with ageing, many of those advantages become disbenefits. RAND's findings reveal that "childbearing histories of women aged 50 and older, the research shows that women who bore six or more children are likely to suffer poorer health in later years than those women who had fewer children or no children at all" (RAND, 1998). This study encapsulates the inverse relationship between number of children and well-being in later years of life. The issue of poor health could also be tied to certain condition in fertility (i.e. childbirth). An important finding that arises from RAND's study is how a "women who lost a child during the first year of its life and women who delivered their first child before they reached 18 years of age both had an increased likelihood of poor health at age 50 and beyond".
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 612 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Shoe Et Tu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Aug, 2006 08:42 am
Likewise, individuals who had typhoid or the flu of 1918...etc also had poor health in the middle/old age.

Good health, good genes, good education, good life, little stress lead to a healthy old age ( or so the EXPERTS say ).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Tween girls - Discussion by sozobe
Excessive Public Affection to Small Children - Discussion by Phoenix32890
BS child support! - Discussion by Baldimo
Teaching boy how to be boys again - Discussion by Baldimo
Sex Education and Applied Psychology? - Discussion by gungasnake
A very sick 6 years old boy - Discussion by navigator
Baby at 8 weeks - Discussion by irisalert
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Number of Children had and quality of life
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 07:41:15