1
   

Gingrich: ‘This Is, In Fact, World War III’

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 08:52 am
Sorry, Newtie, we can't call it World War III until France surrenders. ---BBB
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 360 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 08:55 am
Sweet neocon wishful thinking.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 12:26 pm
BBB

Could you give me a link on this.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 01:31 pm
Blatham
Blatham, this is from the Seattle Times re Gingrich on Meet the Press:

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/archives/2006/07/gingrich_says_its_world_war_iii.html

BBB
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 01:32 pm
Blatham:

Here is the transcript. July 16 show.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 02:50 pm
Gingrich put forth the same argument a week earlier (July 15) in an interview:

With a Seeattle Times Reporter

Pretty disgusting to make the WWIII claim in order to foster the Christian Right votes for his party, IMO.

Cheney is already using the Isreal / Lebanon killings to boost votes as well.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Jul, 2006 02:54 pm
Cheney needs to tread water in the lake of fire right next to Napoleon, Alexander. Hitler, the whole bunch. IMHO. Of course, that's not for me to decide. more's the luck for him.
0 Replies
 
paull
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 02:19 pm
I think the WW3 idea is over the top, since there is still one to be fought with China, but I do like this part of the interview with the Newt:

Quote:
"Israel wouldn't leave southern Lebanon as long as there was a single missile there. I would go in and clean them all out and I would announce that any Iranian airplane trying to bring missiles to re-supply them would be shot down. This idea that we have this one-sided war where the other team gets to plan how to kill us and we get to talk, is nuts."



It's actually simple, isn't it?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Jul, 2006 09:13 pm
paull wrote:
I think the WW3 idea is over the top, since there is still one to be fought with China, but I do like this part of the interview with the Newt:

Quote:
"Israel wouldn't leave southern Lebanon as long as there was a single missile there. I would go in and clean them all out and I would announce that any Iranian airplane trying to bring missiles to re-supply them would be shot down. This idea that we have this one-sided war where the other team gets to plan how to kill us and we get to talk, is nuts."



It's actually simple, isn't it?


Well, no, not really. But the rest of us can sympathize if you get all jelly-in-the-knees juggling one ball.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gingrich: ‘This Is, In Fact, World War III’
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 04:28:49
▲ ▼