1
   

SKOOL DAZE

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:08 am
SKOOL DAZE

The following report on the nation's largest teachers union was provided by Jason L. Riley in the July 14 edition of Political Diary...

The motto of the National Education Association, which concluded a four-day annual convention in Orlando last week, is "Great Public Schools for Every Child." But a perusal of its "Legislative Program for the 110th Congress" reveals that the NEA's interests are, well, politically extensive.

That document's contents are also the union's campaign priorities for electing the next Congress in November. And they are particularly enlightening for anyone still under the illusion that the NEA is simply a collective-bargaining outfit for teachers. The organization's primary focus continues to be self-preservation, which means obstructing any and all reforms that threaten union dominance of public education. But according to the program, the NEA also supports, among other things:

* the development of a national energy policy that stresses conservation and "reduces dependence on foreign sources of energy";

* the establishment and maintenance of federal wilderness areas;

* stronger federal action in solving the problem of toxic waste dumping;

* a tax-supported, single-payer (i.e., Canadian-style) health care plan for all residents of the United States, its territories and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

* the return of a media "fairness doctrine," which muted broadcast competition for decades;

* "reproductive freedom";

* a national holiday honoring Cesar Chavez;

* a nuclear freeze;

* a moratorium on capital punishment at the state and federal levels;

* "U.S. participation in and equitable financing of the United Nations and related bodies";

* "a progressive tax system," and -- was there ever a doubt -- "restoring the estate tax."


How a nuclear freeze relates to high student dropout rates or dismal reading and math test scores is a mystery left unexplained. But with 2.7 million members, the NEA is the largest union in the country and has clearly become a powerful lobby for every active left-wing cause, and a few that are dead. Last year, the NEA spent $25 million on "political activities and lobbying," and another $65.5 million on "contributions, gifts and grants" to overtly politicized organizations that for the most part are in lock-step with the Democratic National Committee.

All of this cash comes from mandated dues dunned from teachers who may or may not share NEA President Reg Weaver's affection for socialist labor leaders, or his aversion to "any means test for Medicare." But either way, they're paying for it.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 793 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:23 am
GREAT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR EVERY CHILD!

Not one of the items on their wish list has anything to do with that wonderful motto.

Maybe they can add a merit system to grade teachers.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 06:36 am
Well, cj. I, for one, am not at all surprised. Incidentally, The American Federation of Teachers IS a union, but the NEA is not. Never contributed to PAC, EVER, because it is my belief that the profession should not align itself with politics. Dream on, Letty.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 07:44 am
Among cj's complaint list:
Quote:
* a national holiday honoring Cesar Chavez;


Ah, so now the brave, inspirational Cesar Chavez gets added to the Right's knee-jerk hate list. Eeeewwww, they like Cesar Chavez-we all know about Cesar Chavez.

I don't know what you know about Cesar Chavez, but I know he stood up for the grape pickers who were treated like dogs. It is entirely appropriate to expect a union to honor such a man.

Incidentally, Chavez' birthday is already a state holiday in several states, so it's not too big a step toward making it a national holiday. And the US has issued a stamp in his honor.

Only among the far righties is the name Cesar Chavez an epithet. To the rest of us, it is a name of honor.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e3/Cesar-chavez-USPS.jpg/200px-Cesar-chavez-USPS.jpg
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:21 am
kelticwizard wrote:
Among cj's complaint list:
Quote:
* a national holiday honoring Cesar Chavez;


Ah, so now the brave, inspirational Cesar Chavez gets added to the Right's knee-jerk hate list. Eeeewwww, they like Cesar Chavez-we all know about Cesar Chavez.

I don't know what you know about Cesar Chavez, but I know he stood up for the grape pickers who were treated like dogs. It is entirely appropriate to expect a union to honor such a man.

Incidentally, Chavez' birthday is already a state holiday in several states, so it's not too big a step toward making it a national holiday. And the US has issued a stamp in his honor.

Only among the far righties is the name Cesar Chavez an epithet. To the rest of us, it is a name of honor.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e3/Cesar-chavez-USPS.jpg/200px-Cesar-chavez-USPS.jpg


There are many citizens who have done important work for this nation. We can't have "holidays" for all of them.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:24 am
What complaint list?
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:27 am
Woiyo:

Fair enough. But my point is that this list is supposed to be a long list of things that the author considers pretty outrageous for a teachers' union to support. And Cesar Chavez is a figure all unions can be proud of. The fact that several states already have his birthday as a state holiday means the idea of making his birthday a national holiday is not an outrageous position.

I'm not saying it should be made one-only that that the drive to make it one is hardly radical, as cj's article would have you believe. You would expect a union-any union-to support that drive. Whether it should be granted or not is another question.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:31 am
cjhsa wrote:
What complaint list?

Your entire first post is one long complaint list about the positions the NEA supports.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 08:38 am
It was a cut and paste. I highlighted the areas I wanted to point out, nothing more.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:35 am
The Cesar Chavez holiday was highlighted. So I presume you wanted to draw attention to it. You did.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 09:43 am
Alright KW, I have no problem with Cesar Chavez, but I do with a bunch of union assbags that just want another paid day off at the public's expense. Fair enough?
0 Replies
 
coachryan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Jul, 2006 10:06 am
cjhsa wrote:
It was a cut and paste. I highlighted the areas I wanted to point out, nothing more.


And you highlighted those areas because you supported them??? Rolling Eyes

I think not.

I would say that "complaint list" is a pretty accurate description of your cut and paste. Why be ashamed about complaining about it though. You disagree with the aims of the organization, so what.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » SKOOL DAZE
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 03:51:08