1
   

Why Isn't the Media Talking About the Growing Resistance...

 
 
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 11:47 am
Why Isn't the Media Talking About the Growing Resistance Within the Military to Bush Policy in Iraq?

Over and over when people ask me what I'm working on and I tell them about the collected stories of opposition, about the profiles in Mission Rejected, I hear comments like, "There are soldiers against the war? But it's a volunteer army..."

Civilians sometimes ask why these men and women join the military.


Not really. Too often we forget about the insidious and quiet though steady draft by default that comes from the endless ranks of the poor in the United States who are beguiled by the lure of a better life. Then there's stop loss. The true volunteers are not necessarily in lock step regarding policy. And more and more we see the result of this contention among the ranks: Soldiers are mustering out. They are joining groups like Veterans for Peace and Iraq Veterans against the War. They are filing for conscientious objector status. They are going AWOL. They are deserting to Canada.

As the Democrats drift around searching for a viable policy vis-à-vis this disastrous war, they might want to start by supporting the men and women of our proud military who are standing up and saying, "No!" to orders they consider immoral and illegal. Democratic candidates have no right to wonder why they're not shoe-ins in the midterm elections, not so long as they meander around mumbling bland and evasive nothing statements engineered by committee to help them in the polls. Stand for something. Talk to many of these same lawmakers in private, and they sing a different tune--of course the war is wrong. Why the difference between public and private discourse? They're ruled by polls. The same cannot be said about our fighting men and women of the U.S. military. They are risking their freedom and their future careers by rejecting the mission--but they're doing it anyway because it's the right thing to do.

They deserve our immediate support. Right now Lt. Ehren Watada is atFt. Lewis, Washington. The lieutenant says he's ready to fight inAfghanistan, but that the Iraq War is illegal and he won't go. Army Specialist Suzanne Swift is another story all together, and one worth more discussion--however her situation is just as valid even if it speaks to a more specific problem in the military.

Here's something to do today: pick a handful of Democrats who are acting like they might be able to win a seat in the midterm elections and send them a barrage of email demanding that they support these two courageous soldiers, soldiers standing up to the monolith of the U.S. military and echoing their Vietnam-era elders acts of years ago: The echo is real. I was a Vietnam War resister. I've seen this before. We're heading in the same direction. It's time.

huffingtonpost
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 347 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 11:48 am
perhaps subversion is still a criminal offense and they are sh1t scared
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 11:57 am
Military men and women are trained to follow orders whether they agree with the command or not. Under these conditions, they will not speak out what they truly believe, because there are consequences for doing so.

That's the reason why "retired" generals are the ones that speak out against the current war in Iraq. As citizens, they have the "freedom" to speak.
0 Replies
 
Ellinas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 12:00 pm
Anwser is too simple. Because they don't want the resistance to grow with a bigger rate.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 12:20 pm
Those that disagree with the war will tell you they want to be in Iraq because of their friends - not because the war is "right."
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jun, 2006 03:40 pm
A high percentage did not volunteer for Iraq but signed up for the National Guards or the Reserves which means that if the regular military personnel is insufficient they go in NOT replace sufficient regulars. They went in to help with National disasters not for invasions or illegal international occupation of another country.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why Isn't the Media Talking About the Growing Resistance...
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 11:18:42