From today's Guardian, pages 54, 55, 56 and 57:
Don't go there!
The new
Rough Guide to Britain warns that Buckingham Palace is ?'bland' and an ?'anti-climax'. But it's not the only tourist attraction that fails to live up to the hype. Here 12 Guardian writers pick their least favourite days out:
Stonehenge, Wiltshire
Sam Wollaston
The main problem is that they made it too small. "Bloody hell, is that it?" said my travelling companion recently, as we drove along the A303. "It's like a miniature model of Stonehenge."
Pyramids, temples, famous people, they're always disappointingly small, but Stonehenge is especially so, I think, because of pictures in schoolbooks of hairy dudes hauling massive rocks along on tree-trunk rollers.
The problem used to be surmountable, because wandering among the stones, they did indeed seem massive. And there was a magic about the place ?- you could touch the same cold stone the hairy dudes touched more than 5,000 years ago, admire the beautiful lichen, feel the power. Not any more though, unless you're a druid, an official modern-day hairy dude.
I know it's for all the right reasons that visitors aren't allowed among the stones, but looking at it from behind a fence, with a bunch of scary-looking guards making sure you don't make a run for it, is not the same. It's the difference between seeing an animal in the wild and an animal at the zoo.
Oh, and the noise of all that traffic doesn't really help either.