Reply
Wed 31 May, 2006 10:12 am
Gore: Bush is 'renegade rightwing extremist'
Oliver Burkeman and Jonathan Freedland
Wednesday May 31, 2006
The Guardian
Al Gore has made his sharpest attack yet on the George Bush presidency, describing the current US administration as "a renegade band of rightwing extremists".
In an interview with the Guardian today, the former vice-president calls himself a "recovering politician", but launches into the political fray more explicitly than he has previously done during his high-profile campaigning on the threat of global warming.
Denying that his politics have shifted to the left since he lost the court battle for the 2000 election, Mr Gore says: "If you have a renegade band of rightwing extremists who get hold of power, the whole thing goes to the right."
But he claims he does not "expect to be a candidate" for president again, while refusing explicitly to rule out another run. Asked if any event could change his mind, he says: "Not that I can see."
Mr Gore, who appeared at the Guardian Hay literary festival over the bank holiday weekend, is promoting An Inconvenient Truth, a documentary and book detailing the climate change crisis that he warns "could literally end civilisation".
The new levels of attention he is receiving have led some Democrats to call on him to run again for president, while others have responded with anger that Mr Gore did not show the same level of passion in the 2000 campaign.
He has since acknowledged that he followed too closely the advice of his consultants during that campaign, and - before he started to scoff at the idea of running again - swore that if he ever did so, he would speak his mind.
In the years since, he has been a steady critic of specific Bush administration policies. He opposed the war on Iraq at a time when most prominent Democrats were supporting it, and more recently spoke out against what he called "a gross and excessive power grab" by the administration over phone tapping.
In the interview Mr Gore also distances himself from Tony Blair on the subject of nuclear power, which the prime minister has insisted is "back on the agenda with a vengeance". Mr Gore says he is "sceptical about it playing a much larger role," and that although it might have a part to play in Britain or China, it will not be "a silver bullet" in the fight against global warming.
In the US, Mr Gore's environmental campaign has sparked a backlash from some on the right who accuse him of scaremongering. A series of television advertisements, launched by a thinktank called the Competitive Enterprise Institute, argue that carbon dioxide emissions are a sign of American productivity and progress.
Mr Gore's true attitude towards a potential return to the White House - or, at least, a potential battle with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination - remains unknown.
At the weekend, Time magazine reported that he was telling key fundraisers they should feel free to sign on with other potential candidates. The magazine quoted unnamed Democratic sources as saying that the former vice-president had also been asking the fundraisers to "tell everybody I'm not running".
Mr Gore would not find it difficult to raise millions of dollars, if he did decide to run. But while public denials might prove a wise campaign strategy - not least by prolonging the period of positive attention Mr Gore is now receiving - actively turning away fundraisers does suggest a firmer resolve not to re-enter electoral politics.
It is significant, however, that Mr Gore refuses to go beyond saying that he has no "plans" for such a campaign. "I haven't made a Shermanesque statement because it just seems odd to do so," he has said - a reference to the famous announcement by the civil war general William Sherman, who unequivocally refused to stand in the election of 1884. "If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve," General Sherman said.
Jonathan Freedland's interview with Al Gore will be aired on More4 on Saturday June 3 at 4.55pm.
Gore Says Bush Betrayed the US by Using 9/11 as a Reason for War ...Gore Says Bush Betrayed the US by Using 9/11 as a Reason for War in Iraq ... "He betrayed this country!" Mr. Gore shouted into the microphone at a rally of ...
www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0209-01.htm - 15k -
As much as I agree with Mr. Gore's sentiments, the cynical part of me can't help but think, "Yeah, he would say that, wouldn't he? I mean, he did lose to Bush in the most outrageous manner possible."
Would that he were this effusive during the 2000 campaign.
Is it true that Ms. Gore now advertises for WEIGHT WATCHERS?
That's my reaction, too, blacksmithn.
Happy that he's saying it, and who knows how it would have flown in 2000, but wish he'd have said it then.
No doubt it would have been nice to see this type of voracity coming from Gore in 2000, but he was too caught up in the politics of winning an election. Those who are tend to stick tightly to their prescribed scripts rather than stick to their nearest and dearest convictions.
But I'm glad Gore is coming out fighting in this manner for our environment, and those on the right who denigrate him only make themselves sound more like the adolescents they've always been.
Gore coulda done a lot of things better in 2000. But that was before Bushie's negligence on 911 and his lying us into war. Gore has said the right things for the good of the country on those matters and on warrantless domestic spying. And he finally is getting to a clear environmental vision for the future beyond oil and nuclear power.
I emailed Gore to question GWB on Saddam Hussein for the debate. He instead went the 'gentle' route. Maybe if he had done what he had done to Democrats in debates there might not have been 9/11 at all.
If Gore runs again, I hope he becomes more honest about his convictions, speaks out, and says what he really apparently believes. Republicans would be assured of victory for sure. I'm not saying that to tweak some of you here. I think he knows he has to sugar coat his beliefs so that he does not scare his support to death and drive the fence riders to the other side, which would result in a much bigger loss than he suffered the first time.
I use the phrase, "more honest about his convictions" with caution, as I am not sure he really believes some of his stuff or he is attempting to ride the wave of doom and gloom to political success. Such has never worked well before but perhaps he has himself convinced that he has become skillful enough at it that it might work?
What's "right wing" about Bush?
Ticomaya wrote:What's "right wing" about Bush?
"Renegade" doesn't sound right for someone who polled half of the votes.
Of course, he's a uniter, not a divider, don't forget.
okie wrote:I think he [Gore] knows he has to sugar coat his beliefs so that he does not scare his support to death and drive the fence riders to the other side....
This is a joke, right?
When Bush ran in 2000, if he told us honestly, "I plan to invade Iraq without the world support my father had, plus I intend to slash one third of the Social Security money coming in to support your retirement", exactly how many states do you suppose he would have won?
Ticomaya wrote:What's "right wing" about Bush?
You're saying he's "wrong wing"?
dlowan wrote:Ticomaya wrote:What's "right wing" about Bush?
You're saying he's "wrong wing"?
I'm saying Bush is hardly "right wing," and Gore is just fabulating as he so often tends to do.
What is Bush if he's not right wing?
FreeDuck wrote:What is Bush if he's not right wing?
You should note that when I asked the question, "
What's 'right wing' about Bush?", I was not trying to pin a label on the man, and decline your invitation to do so now.
The implication of
your question, however, is that he is right wing. Why do you think so, FD?
By process of elimination, I suppose. He's certainly not left wing, moderate, libertarian, green, or any other thing I can think of. Perhaps we need to come up with a new place on the political spectrum just for him as he's such a bizarre entity.
If you want to argue that he isn't true to conservative principles and is therefore not conservative and not "right", you could take that road. But the fact is that his alliances are with the right wing faction in politics.
kelticwizard wrote:okie wrote:I think he [Gore] knows he has to sugar coat his beliefs so that he does not scare his support to death and drive the fence riders to the other side....
This is a joke, right?
When Bush ran in 2000, if he told us honestly, "I plan to invade Iraq without the world support my father had, plus I intend to slash one third of the Social Security money coming in to support your retirement", exactly how many states do you suppose he would have won?
Where did you get the slashing of Social Security money coming in by one third? That is a joke, right?