1
   

Why are Jay Garner and Barbara Bodine kicked out?

 
 
frolic
 
Reply Sun 11 May, 2003 04:49 am
Although he has yet to arrive, the newly appointed U.S. official charged with leading Iraq's transition already has begun to shake up the operation here -- including changing key officials -- in an attempt to overcome debilitating internal problems and cope with a dangerous volatility on the streets.

L. Paul Bremer III, a counter-terrorism expert who will supplant retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner at the top of the Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, has been tapped to better coordinate the civil and military aspects of the U.S. operation. He is expected to bring in several of his own people at high levels.

One of the first top officials to go was Barbara Bodine, a veteran diplomat given the key task of getting Baghdad and central Iraq running again. The agency has yet to formally announce Bodine's sudden departure, and the State Department insisted that her exit was a routine rotation, but she said she was given three days to leave. At least two other senior officials are expected to depart soon as well.

With the departing Bodine going so far as to say that "we didn't know what we were walking into," U.S. officials concede that many of the key assumptions that drove planning for the postwar administration were wrong. For instance, they are shifting from a military-style security operation to one that relies on neighborhood patrols. Across the board, they are struggling to adjust their strategies to the realities on the ground.

"It's too soon to say whether this is working or not working," said Tim Carney, the senior U.S. advisor for the Ministry of Industry and Minerals. "What you can say is that it's ragged. Some things are working because Iraqis here got their act together, especially in putting back together ministries and essential services."

Reconstruction agency staff members expressed some apprehension about the kind of changes Bremer will bring, but there was also hope that the situation could improve after he arrives this week.

"I don't know if he's a leader, but he's a manager. And that's what we need right now," a senior agency official said.

Bremer plans to replace Bodine, a former ambassador to Yemen who did diplomatic duty in Baghdad in the 1980s and Kuwait during Iraq's invasion of that country in 1990, with a retired foreign service officer, said a State Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity. Others who went in with Garner -- who has said he will leave after a limited "hand-over" period -- could be rotated out, the source said. A list is circulating at the State Department of people whom Bremer wants to take with him, the official said.

In addition to Bodine, John Limbert, who served as the advisor to Iraq's Cultural Ministry, will leave. Limbert was serving in the U.S. Embassy in Iran when students took it over during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and he was among the hostages. Senior agency officials suggested that Margaret Tutwiler, the ambassador to Morocco who was once a top aide to Secretary of State James A. Baker III, could be leaving her communications post soon as well.

Bremer will be working with a system that has built-in problems, a hybrid that tries to fuse two very different government cultures: the Defense and the State departments.

At the same time, the agency's officials are struggling to deal with a litany of practical problems. The city still lacks an operating telephone system, so staff members are often forced to stand outdoors using hand-held satellite phones. Perhaps most important are security concerns, which make it impossible for the staff to move around the country, or for contractors to begin their work.

"The biggest problem is security and communication," said a senior official with the civil administration. "I would move heaven and Earth and spend a lot of money to fix those pieces on the belief that a lot of other issues would then fall into place."

The civil administration has two missions: to get the country's ministries providing services again and to foster the process for forming an interim, and ultimately a permanent, government.

In addition, a separate military operation is, at least until now, the chief authority in the country and operates as an independent institution. Bremer, who will report to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld will, it is hoped, better synchronize the efforts of the two bureaucracies.

Just as the military encountered unexpected resistance in southern Iraq, the civil administration has been encountering unanticipated obstacles. When U.S. officials mapped their effort to get the country going again, they prepared for a significant flow of refugees, a humanitarian crisis, thousands of prisoners of war and for a longer honeymoon period -- a time in which Iraqi people would be heady with a sense of relief at the departure of Saddam Hussein.

Hardly a single Iraqi fled the country, however, and far fewer were internally displaced than projected. The prisoners of war have mostly been released.

What came as the biggest surprise was the violent and long-running looting of government offices -- looting that persists on the streets of a capital that seems perpetually on the cusp of chaos. Although officials had a foretaste of Baghdad's anarchy in the looting that ensued after allied troops entered southern Iraq, the collapse of Baghdad came so quickly that the civilian officials were unable to adjust in time to cope with it.

Agency officials said that despite weeks of planning, they were unprepared for the number of obstacles. "There was a constant reevaluation," Bodine said.

A major problem has been the civil administration's inability to communicate with Iraqis, either to explain what the U.S. officials are doing, or where to go if they are trying to collect their $20 stipend or where to sign up to return to work. In the absence of concrete information, thousands of Iraqis have followed fraudulent instructions from self-appointed leaders trying to create a power base.

This week, the civil administration hopes to restart a television station and a newspaper. So far, the main communication has been by radio.

Despite its troubles, the civil operation has taken significant steps in the last few weeks, notably to revive the country's ministries, which oversaw most day-to-day operations.

While that process will take months to complete, it has started at the ministries of Health; Industry and Minerals; Planning; Trade; and Oil. Each of those ministries now has a U.S. or allied country advisor, an Iraqi manager who worked previously in the ministry and an Iraqi exile advisor selected by the Pentagon.

But many employees have yet to return to work. Most ministries still lack offices, either because the buildings were bombed during the war or, more often, because looters destroyed them.

Security problems have debilitated the reconstruction agency's operations, hampering officials' efforts to leave even the palace grounds so that they can see the places they are supposed to be rebuilding, and also have delayed the arrival of many of the contractors who will do the actual work of reconstructing the country's infrastructure.

The lack of security has undermined Iraqis' faith in the U.S. because they now regularly face personal crime, ranging from theft to murder.

Changes already are being made in the security operation, but Bremer is expected to make this a top priority. Military police are now beginning to arrive in Baghdad, along with additional troops. Joint patrols involving Baghdad officers and the U.S.-trained military police have begun and are expected to increase.

An early mission will be to change the way the Iraqi police operate -- they are accustomed to sitting in their office and waiting for the secret police to tell them whom to arrest.

Now they will be expected to walk a beat like British constables and community police in the United States.

For those U.S. officials who arrived in Baghdad two weeks ago and camped in a palace that had no electricity, running water or even windows, the operation seems to have come a long way.

"It was completely absurd -- our world shrunk in on us," said a senior civil administration official. "Slowly, what we've been doing is trying to push our world back out."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,182 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2003 10:39 am
If I remember correctly, Frolic, Garner had to go because he didn't wear a suit... Maybe Bodine doesn't wear earrings. Who knows! This isn't government by the reasonable; it's government by whatever-makes-me-look-good...
0 Replies
 
mamajuana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2003 03:31 pm
Thanks, frolic - good information.

Sometimes a lot of this looks more like a war between administration people than any other. maybe they'll knock each other off. Meanwhile, what do you make of the returned Shiite who has been gehtering thousands to his view of an ordered Islamic country?
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 May, 2003 09:35 pm
I watched a session of Parliament today, and the Brits were very critical of the coalition's Post-war work. They are understandably angry that it is taking us longer to provide water for the Iraqis than it took to prosecute the war.

It seems to me a plausible answer to the "firings" is the poor job that has been done so far. I don't judge Garner or Bodine harshly, because I can't imagine the difficulty entailed in what they are trying to do, and the environment they are doing it in.

I do hope Bremer has a plan.

I saw an interview a couple of weeks before the war with the Shiite leader, who is now situated to rise to a position of leadership in Iraq. During the interview, he was pro-American, a supporter of the war and very critical of Saddam and the Ba'athists. I've heard that he's called for the immediate withdrawal of the coalition. I don't know if he represented himself transparently in the pre-war interview. He's one to watch.

The female member of parliament, who'd threatened to resign before.....Clare....can't think of her last name, issued a stinging resignation to Jack Straw on the floor of Parliament over the post-war. Her primary beef, being the coalition's lack of effort toward bringing the UN into the mix.
0 Replies
 
mamajuana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 May, 2003 10:22 pm
Frolic - because so far Powell won and Rumsfeld lost. And Rumsfeld, being the gracious thing he is, is bound to come back kicking, so maybe this will be fun to watch. One of the things Barbara Bodine wanted to do was bring Arab speaking personnel into play. A lot of this interplay is interesting, because Margaret Tutweiler, also fired, is one of James Baker's protege's, and yet was unprotected by Rumsfeld, who was in the same power plays as Rumsfeld. Maybe this is "when theives fall apart?"
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 09:08 am
I heard an analysis last night on NPR of what happened re: Garner, Bodine, and Bremer. Simply put, it went as follows:

We are "too thin on the ground." Rumsfeld refused to put in more troops though they are badly needed. This is because a) it costs more and b) he doesn't like -- to be wrong -- to have misjudged the situation -- to have been caught not planning carefully enough.

But the fact is, the Pentagon didn't plan. Garner and Bodine didn't fail, the place fell apart from lack of planning and they are the scapegoats. Efforts will be made to make Bremer succeed and if he doesn't (which is thought likely) to make him look good, make it Garner and Bodine's fault.

This was from a commentator/analyst who (if I got it straight) is in country and has been there for some time. The situation there is a disaster, not just a disaster waiting to happen.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why are Jay Garner and Barbara Bodine kicked out?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 12:02:52