1
   

In Louisiana, 17 years of FALSE IMPRISONMENT worth only 150k

 
 
Reply Sun 21 May, 2006 11:43 am
Holy crap! Shocked

Quote:
Wrongly convicted man seeks $150,000

BATON ROUGE, La. A former Louisiana prisoner who served time on a wrongful conviction has become the first to apply for money under a new state law for the years he spent behind bars.
Gene Bibbins of Baton Rouge is asking a state district judge to award him 150-thousand dollars, the maximum cash award the law allows.

Bibbins spent 17 years at the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola on rape and burglary convictions.

A jury convicted Bibbins of aggravated rape and aggravated burglary in 1987. He received a life sentence.

In 2002, D-N-A testing on evidence found that Bibbins was not the person who raped the 13-year-old victim or burglarized the apartment where she was staying. D-N-A testing did not exist at the time of the trial.


Click here for article

The guy was falsely imprisoned,
lost 17 years of his life,
missed out on countless opportunities (personal and financial),
had his reputation destroyed,
and suffered the hell of 17 years of prison,
and all he's entitled to is the possibility of a MAXIMUM of 150k?

Something is very, very wrong here.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,639 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 May, 2006 10:07 pm
Isn't it ironic that in today's dollars, his imprisonment cost the taxpayers about $600,000 for the seven years of his life lost. The $150,000 he received will be blown on luxuries he really can't afford, and waste over 80 percent of it on 'junk.' He has never learned money management.
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 May, 2006 10:20 pm
What?
I would assume that after 17 years in prison, it's going to be difficult (to say the least) to find work and get his life back on track.
Your presuming the man doesn't know "money management" and that he will "waste 80 percent of it on 'junk'." We have no idea if this is the case or not.

I would think that he is entitled to MUCH more money than that, simply for the fact that so much was taken from the man. It's easy to just read "17 years of false imprisonment", but step back and think of everything this guy has lost. We're not talking years, not months, spent in prison for something he was not guilty for.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 May, 2006 09:04 am
Justan, That was my exact point; he spent 7 years in prison for a crime he didn't committ, and is now "given" $150,000, a paultry sum compared to how much it cost the state to put this guy in prison. Most people, no matter who it is, that gets a huge some of money - like winning the lottery - has no idea how to manage money. Money management isn't learned "on the spot." It takes years of practice and experience.

I'll stick with my opinion.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 May, 2006 09:37 am
Jeez, that's about $2.40 an hour. That's pathetic.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 May, 2006 09:50 am
I clicked on this thread just after putting down my daily paper in which it is reported:

Quote:
Case could redefine the value of Fido to family
Lawsuit - An Estacada family seeks $1.625 million for loss of companionship after their dog's brutal death
Monday, May 22, 2006
STEVE MAYES
OREGON CITY -- An Estacada family will ask a jury this week to award $1.625 million for the loss of its dog, Grizz, in a case that could help redefine the way courts view the bond between people and their pets.

The 14-year-old cocker spaniel and Labrador retriever mix had to be euthanized after he was run over in 2004 by Raymond E. Weaver, a neighbor. Weaver was convicted last year of animal abuse, and now Mark Greenup and his family are suing Weaver in a case that is attracting interest from U.S. legal experts and a French documentary crew.



More: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1148266525194030.xml&coll=7

Perhaps this man should consider suing for "loss of companionship" covering 17 years of his life.

Pathetic doesn't really begin to cover it.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 May, 2006 10:00 am
Moral of the story: It's a thousand times better to be a dog in Oregon than a wrongfully convicted man in Louisiana.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 May, 2006 10:08 am
I think ifyou look up "pathetic" in the dictonary you will find this moral.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » In Louisiana, 17 years of FALSE IMPRISONMENT worth only 150k
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2025 at 08:58:09