Climate Change must be tackled NOW

Scandinavia, Greenland and Siberia reached an unprecedented 45% in ozone layer depletion in 1996. Everyone in the Northern hemisphere is now just as much affected by UV radiation as if you'd live on Antarctica. We're living the full effects of our pollution as we speak.
If the Montreal treaty is respected, the ozone layer should gently restore itself from 2050 on. That is, if current CFK-producing countries stop their habits. China promised to stop producing the ozon-eating CFK's soon. But they're still in use throughout the Third World.

I didn't just become an environmental activist out of boredom, you know...

Environmental activists evidently don't have to bother with facts.

Proposing to solve a global threat by expanding the use of an even deadlier technology can hardly be considered responsible environmental stewardship. WISE summarised some of the arguments against a nuclear solution to climate change in their report for WWF, 'Climate Change and Nuclear Power' (Schneider, 2000):

-investments into nuclear power projects drain badly-needed funds from energy efficiency programs, most of which have a far lower specific greenhouse gas abatement cost than nuclear energy;
-nuclear power projects have a variety of negative systemic impacts including: the need for inefficient large grid systems; the need for highly-qualified staff; and blocking innovation in the supply and demand sectors, as well as in the development of efficient small-scale plant;
-countries with nuclear power are among the highest carbon dioxide (CO2) emitters in the world because large-scale power plants tend to boost electricity consumption - and not only of nuclear origin - rather than improvements in efficiency;
-nuclear energy only produces electricity, but modern societies need a significant share of their energy in the form of heat (and cold). Under these circumstances, nuclear power loses its greenhouse gas emission advantage over natural gas-fired cogeneration plant and has significantly higher emissions than biogas cogeneration plants;
-nuclear power remains particularly dangerous and difficult to control as last year's accident at Tokaimura, Japan, has once again illustrated. The radioactive waste problem remains unsolved and nuclear proliferation is one of the greatest threats to international peace.

In conclusion, an efficient greenhouse gas abatement strategy will be based on energy efficiency and not on the use of nuclear power.

There is more to the so-called myth of the nuclear saviors: