wolf wrote:I have no clue how you come to that, but the effect is the same: sea levels will rise.
Homework for tomorrow: take an ice cube, put it into a glass of water, and fill it up to a level where it only just doesn't flow over. If you are right, the glass will flow over as the ice cube melts. If I am right, it won't. In the Arctic sea, the ice caps are floating on the polar sea. In Antarctica, the polar ice rests on a continent, so the principle doesn't apply. Then again, Antarctica is cooling, not warming, as you have yourself acknowledged a few pages ago.
wolf wrote:3 billion euros lost in agricultural revenues this summer, remember?
The standard estimate is that preventing global warming would cost the industrial states 3% of GDP. This computes to $300 billion in the US, and about the same in Europe. See the difference?
wolf wrote:<taps fingers and waits for opponent giving up>
No, it's really just exhaustion. Good night.