1
   

New security glitch found in Diebold system

 
 
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 04:05 pm
Quote:
http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site181/2006/0110/20060110_043530_iba_logo.gif

New security glitch found in Diebold system

Officials say machines have 'dangerous' holes

05/10/2006

By Ian Hoffman, STAFF WRITER


Armed with a little basic knowledge of Diebold voting systems and a standard component available at any computer store, someone with a minute or two of access to a Diebold touch screen could load virtually any software into the machine and disable it, redistribute votes or alter its performance in myriad ways.

http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_3805089


Here are the details. Built into the software that runs the Diebold machines is a piece of code called an interpreter. This is similar to the BASIC language found on older computers like the Apple II, the Commodore 64, etc. The interpreter accepts instructions written in a specific language, translates them into executable instructions, and then executes those instructions.

What Black Box voting has found is that when a memory card is inserted into the Diebold machines, the software quickly checks the memory card for files written in that special language. If none are found, the machine operates normally and can pass all inspections and tests for accuracy. But, if the particular memory card inserted into the machine, on election day, has a file written in that special language, that file is read by the interpreter and the instructions carried out. Such a program can change vote results, erase audit trails, and even erase the program file on the memory card to conceal what has been done. The person inserting the card may not even know what is going on.

There is no reason for such an interpreter system to be in a voting machine. The theory of a voting machine is that the software is locked in and unchangeable. All it does is count button presses and save the record. There is no legitimate need for an on-board interpreter that looks for an executes programs on the vote tabulation memory cards.

The point is this; this interpreter proves that the problems with the voting machines are not "glitches". They are intentional functions designed into the systems, with the sole purpose of stealing elections for whomever the owners of the machines are working for.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 349 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 May, 2006 04:18 pm
Re: New security glitch found in Diebold system
freedom4free wrote:
The point is this; this interpreter proves that the problems with the voting machines are not "glitches". They are intentional functions designed into the systems, with the sole purpose of stealing elections for whomever the owners of the machines are working for.


That's quite a leap there. Where is your evidence to prove it? It certianly isn't in the story you linked.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 May, 2006 09:25 am
Quote:
That's quite a leap there. Where is your evidence to prove it?


Quote:
Experts see new Diebold flaw

The new problem is being described as an intentional hole left in the system to allow elections workers to update voting software easily. Instead of using pass codes or other security protocols, anyone with access to a voting machine could install new software that could easily disable a precinct full of machines, Rubin said.

baltimoresun


------------------

... or change the results.

This is the "Interpreter" built into the system, a piece of software with no legitimate use in the voting process, but which makes it easy to sneak new software into an already certified voting machine by placing a file of code onto the memory cards used to collect votes.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 May, 2006 09:46 am
Powerful Government Accountability Office report confirms key 2004 stolen election findings
by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
October 26, 2005

As a legal noose appears to be tightening around the Bush/Cheney/Rove inner circle, a shocking government report shows the floor under the legitimacy of their alleged election to the White House is crumbling.

The latest critical confirmation of key indicators that the election of 2004 was stolen comes in an extremely powerful, penetrating report from the Government Accountability Office that has gotten virtually no mainstream media coverage. Click here for GAO Report

The government's lead investigative agency is known for its general incorruptibility and its thorough, in-depth analyses. Its concurrence with assertions widely dismissed as "conspiracy theories" adds crucial new weight to the case that Team Bush has no legitimate business being in the White House http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2005/1529
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » New security glitch found in Diebold system
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 09:25:17