I haven't read the original text but that's what people are saying, that, he's nailed the true vision of Ian Fleming's, more so than any before. I shouldn't go getting people's hopes up though should I?
Well I was very impressed anyway, I'm just wondering whether, as people are talking of "going back to it's roots", they're going to stick to this new path faithfully and not be tempted to steadily move back to some of the stuff we've seen in previous Bond films, I guess it all depends on who they see him as, the central character.
It's a genuine fresh start, with him gaining his 007 status at the start of the film, as opposed to them simply getting a new actor in and changing the style a bit. The difference is that what they've done gives them more license to really explore new territory with it. Think that bodes well myself, who knows though.
