0
   

$100 Gop Gas Rebate Plan Backfires Tremendously

 
 
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 08:30 am
GOP Plan Backfires


Quote:
WASHINGTON, April 30 ?- The Senate Republican plan to mail $100 checks to voters to ease the burden of high gasoline prices is eliciting more scorn than gratitude from the very people it was intended to help.
Skip to next paragraph
Related
As Gas Prices Go Up, Impact Trickles Down (April 30, 2006)

Aides for several Republican senators reported a surge of calls and e-mail messages from constituents ridiculing the rebate as a paltry and transparent effort to pander to voters before the midterm elections in November.

"The conservatives think it is socialist bunk, and the liberals think it is conservative trickery," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, pointing out that the criticism was coming from across the ideological spectrum.

Angry constituents have asked, "Do you think we are prostitutes? Do you think you can buy us?" said another Republican senator's aide, who was granted anonymity to openly discuss the feedback because the senator had supported the plan.

Conservative talk radio hosts have been particularly vocal. "What kind of insult is this?" Rush Limbaugh asked on his radio program on Friday. "Instead of buying us off and treating us like we're a bunch of whores, just solve the problem." In commentary on Fox News Sunday, Brit Hume called the idea "silly."

The reaction comes as the rising price of gasoline has put the public in a volatile mood and as polls show that cynicism about Congress is at its highest level since 1994.

Still, Eric Ueland, chief of staff to Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, the Republican leader, whose office played a main role in pulling the proposal together, said the rebate was an important short-term step in a broader array of measures that began with last year's energy bill. Constituents "believe government ought to step up to the plate rather than loll around in the dugout," Mr. Ueland wrote in an e-mail message on Sunday.

After members of Congress returned from the spring recess, when they got an earful about gas prices above $3 a gallon, they raced to propose solutions that might take effect before the elections. Democrats were pushing for a 60-day suspension of the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents a gallon, and the Senate Republican leadership settled on the rebate.

Those leaders and Finance Committee aides said many Republicans opposed the Democratic plan because they feared that oil companies, which pay the gas tax, would not pass savings on to the public, or that the laws of supply and demand would push the price up again.

There was also the probable opposition of House Republicans, who have been reluctant to jeopardize the flow of the gas tax revenue to the highway trust fund that underwrites road and bridge projects.

"Our folks thought it might amount to nothing for consumers," said one aide who was granted anonymity to discuss internal leadership deliberations.

Under the proposal, $100 checks would be sent late this summer to an estimated 100 million taxpayers, regardless of car ownership. Single taxpayers with adjusted gross incomes above about $146,000 would be ineligible for the checks, as would couples earning more than about $219,000. The $100 figure was determined by Mr. Frist's office, which calculated that the average driver would pay about $11 per month in federal gas taxes over nine months.



When I heard of the plan, I thought to myself, "Is this a joke?" I can't imagine how many of our taxpayer dollars would be spent administrative costs issuing taxpayers $100 rebates.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,315 • Replies: 31
No top replies

 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 08:45 am
It is a joke. The fact that the idea came from Washington is all the confirmation you should need.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 08:49 am
I'm thinking I could go to Juffly Lube and get an oil change and then MAYBE have enough left to fill my tank..... yes sir that will turn my family finances around and put the Bears on the road to a comfortable and plush retirement....
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 09:06 am
I'm going to buy 100 lotto tickets. I figure the odds of winning are better than the odds of getting a rational energy policy out of this administration.
0 Replies
 
paull
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 10:38 am
Indeed, a really dumb idea. So is suspending gas taxes. Let the price rise, and people will finally adjust their buying and driving habits.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 10:42 am
yesterday I went into a convenience store and had to prepay for 20.00 worth. I started the pump going and put a quart of oil in and then saw that the pump had gone up to 43.26. I cut it off and went in and asked them what the hell they were doing and she responded that she had made a mistake but then wanted the additional 23 and change. I told her she was crazy as a bedbug and I was leaving and she could call the police if she wanted to. I did, she didn't.

HEY!!!! I got over on an oil deal!!!!!! Hope I don't get an invitation to go hunting with Dick Cheney Laughing
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 11:45 am
Somewhere, the arrest warrant for a blueveined polar bear slowly wends it's way through the system....
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 05:53 pm
As I am typing this sentence the Bear is being placed in handcuffs.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 06:13 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
As I am typing this sentence the Bear is being placed in handcuffs.


hope the cops don't show with a warrant before squinney uncuffs me.....
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 06:20 pm
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 06:26 pm
snood wrote:
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?



Dunno if I'd lump Walter in there, maybe okie would be a better fit.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 06:57 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?



Dunno if I'd lump Walter in there, maybe okie would be a better fit.


OK - when you start writing my posts, you feel free to lump him right in there.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:03 pm
snood wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?



Dunno if I'd lump Walter in there, maybe okie would be a better fit.


OK - when you start writing my posts, you feel free to lump him right in there.


I think I was writing my post, Snootie!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:09 pm
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?



Dunno if I'd lump Walter in there, maybe okie would be a better fit.


OK - when you start writing my posts, you feel free to lump him right in there.


I think I was writing my post, Snootie!


Hey, genius. Intentionally mispelling screennames is against the TOS. Don't do it anymore with mine.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:15 pm
snood wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
snood wrote:
What? No Brandon, MCGentrix, cjhsa and Walter Hintler to defend the administration's nifty 'rebate'?



Dunno if I'd lump Walter in there, maybe okie would be a better fit.


OK - when you start writing my posts, you feel free to lump him right in there.


I think I was writing my post, Snootie!


Hey, genius. Intentionally mispelling screennames is against the TOS. Don't do it anymore with mine.


Oh my, the snoodmeister is getting lash like. I am shivering in my CFM boots!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:17 pm
No, I'm not getting anyone-"like". I just refuse to put up with your crap.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:18 pm
BTW I am a sub-genius not a genius, snoodypants.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:21 pm
You're something beneath further comment.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:22 pm
snood wrote:
No, I'm not getting anyone-"like". I just refuse to put up with your crap.


You will not only take it but you will come back on your knees begging for more.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 07:37 pm
man there's a lot of sexual tension on A2K tonight.....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » $100 Gop Gas Rebate Plan Backfires Tremendously
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/15/2026 at 09:22:15