1
   

The story of a hypocrite: The two faces of Rumsfeld

 
 
frolic
 
Reply Fri 9 May, 2003 02:09 am
Q:How long does it take to turn 180°?
A: For Hypocrite Donald Rumsfeld, two years.

In 2000 he was the director of a company which won a $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea

In 2002: he is a member of the Bush gang and declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change


Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea - a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build nuclear weapons.

Mr Rumsfeld was a non-executive director of ABB, a European engineering giant based in Zurich, when it won a $200m contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. The current defence secretary sat on the board from 1990 to 2001, earning $190,000 a year. He left to join the Bush administration.

The reactor deal was part of President Bill Clinton's policy of persuading the North Korean regime to positively engage with the west.

The sale of the nuclear technology was a high-profile contract. ABB's then chief executive, Goran Lindahl, visited North Korea in November 1999 to announce ABB's "wide-ranging, long-term cooperation agreement" with the communist government.

The company also opened an office in the country's capital, Pyongyang, and the deal was signed a year later in 2000. Despite this, Mr Rumsfeld's office said that the defence secretary did not "recall it being brought before the board at any time".

In a statement to the American magazine Newsweek, his spokeswoman Victoria Clarke said that there "was no vote on this". A spokesman for ABB told the Guardian yesterday that "board members were informed about the project which would deliver systems and equipment for light water reactors".

Just months after Mr Rumsfeld took office, President George Bush ended the policy of engagement and negotiation pursued by Mr Clinton, saying he did not trust North Korea, and pulled the plug on diplomacy. Pyongyang warned that it would respond by building nuclear missiles. A review of American policy was announced and the bilateral confidence building steps, key to Mr Clinton's policy of detente, halted.

By January 2002, the Bush administration had placed North Korea in the "axis of evil" alongside Iraq and Iran. If there was any doubt about how the White House felt about North Korea this was dispelled by Mr Bush, who told the Washington Post last year: "I loathe [North Korea's leader] Kim Jong-il."

The success of campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq have enhanced the status of Mr Rumsfeld in Washington. Two years after leaving ABB, Mr Rumsfeld now considers North Korea a "terrorist regime _ teetering on the verge of collapse" and which is on the verge of becoming a proliferator of nuclear weapons. During a bout of diplomatic activity over Christmas he warned that the US could fight two wars at once - a reference to the forthcoming conflict with Iraq. After Baghdad fell, Mr Rumsfeld said Pyongyang should draw the "appropriate lesson".

Critics of the administration's bellicose language on North Korea say that the problem was not that Mr Rumsfeld supported the Clinton-inspired diplomacy and the ABB deal but that he did not "speak up against it". "One could draw the conclusion that economic and personal interests took precedent over non-proliferation," said Steve LaMontagne, an analyst with the Centre for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington.

Many members of the Bush administration are on record as opposing Mr Clinton's plans, saying that weapons-grade nuclear material could be extracted from the type of light water reactors that ABB sold. Mr Rumsfeld's deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, and the state department's number two diplomat, Richard Armitage, both opposed the deal as did the Republican presidential candidate, Bob Dole, whose campaign Mr Rumsfeld ran and where he also acted as defence adviser.

One unnamed ABB board director told Fortune magazine that Mr Rumsfeld was involved in lobbying his hawkish friends on behalf of ABB.

The Clinton package sought to defuse tensions on the Ko rean peninsula by offering supplies of oil and new light water nuclear reactors in return for access by inspectors to Pyongyang's atomic facilities and a dismantling of its heavy water reactors which produce weapons grade plutonium. Light water reactors are known as "proliferation-resistant" but, in the words of one expert, they are not "proliferation-proof".

The type of reactors involved in the ABB deal produce plutonium which needs refining before it can be weaponised. One US congressman and critic of the North Korean regime described the reactors as "nuclear bomb factories".

North Korea expelled the inspectors last year and withdrew from the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in January at about the same time that the Bush administration authorised $3.5m to keep ABB's reactor project going.

North Korea is thought to have offered to scrap its nuclear facilities and missile pro gramme and to allow international nuclear inspectors into the country. But Pyongyang demanded that security guarantees and aid from the US must come first.

Mr Bush now insists that he will only negotiate a new deal with Pyongyang after the nuclear programme is scrapped. Washington believes that offering inducements would reward Pyongyang's "blackmail" and encourage other "rogue" states to develop weapons of mass destruction.

From The Guardian
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,137 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 May, 2003 11:49 pm
Maybe he doesn't think they have nukes because he hasn't sold them to Nth Korea. Frolic - I saw this in the Aussie press and absolutely gagged with disbelief, the man as corrupt as any of the Hussain clan!

So, up to like, yesterday, if questioned about this connection he had his finger on the pulse of the business and was personally aware of every profit-making deal they did. AFTER yesterday, well they didn't bother him with everything now did they?! Iraq!! Fuckin' nukes!!!!! What sort of decisions did he think the company was paying him 16 grand a month for? Whether Disneyland should go with Vanilla Coke or Classic?
0 Replies
 
Scrat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 12:01 am
A person elected by shareholders to a corporation's board of directors who is not affiliated with the company in any other capacity. Rumsfeld was not in a position to make or break a deal to sell a reactor to NK, he was sitting on the board as a watchdog for shareholders.)
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 02:29 am
simple: you supply them with the evil/killer stuff, then denounce them for being "evil" when it doesn't suit you any more .... Where have I heard this senario before? <sigh>
0 Replies
 
wolf
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 03:11 pm
Halliburton in Iraq
http://www.neftegaz.ru/english/lenta/show.php?id=35482


Notice the hilarioulsy tongue-in-cheek last phrase.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 03:18 pm
What is wrong that some American company will take care of providing oil products to Iraqis? Would you prefer them remaining without necessary supplies?
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 May, 2003 06:17 pm
And who's 7 billion dollars is this? I could be wrong but it seems that the US Inc. (for profit, not the bit that funds the DOD) will kindly take over the sale of Iraqi oil and mind the till for them until running costs and 'incidentals' have been sorted out. Could be a while if the 9/11 survivors successfully sue the people of Iraq.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 06:27 pm
Olberman tonight is the first one I've heard mention the Rumsfeld / North Korea nuclear sale connection on national news.

And, to think we here at A2K knew it 3 years ago.

That's why we're referred to as "experts" I suppose. Laughing
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 08:36 am
Scrat wrote:
A person elected by shareholders to a corporation's board of directors who is not affiliated with the company in any other capacity. Rumsfeld was not in a position to make or break a deal to sell a reactor to NK, he was sitting on the board as a watchdog for shareholders.)


Ditto
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The story of a hypocrite: The two faces of Rumsfeld
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/11/2024 at 06:02:06