1
   

Ex - CIA Agent Says WMD Intelligence Ignored

 
 
Reply Sat 22 Apr, 2006 12:16 pm
Quote:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The CIA had evidence Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction six months before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion but was ignored by a White House intent on ousting Saddam Hussein, a former senior CIA official said according to CBS.

Tyler Drumheller, who headed CIA covert operations in Europe during the run-up to the Iraq war, said intelligence opposing administration claims of a WMD threat came from a top Iraqi official who provided the U.S. spy agency with other credible information.

The source ``told us that there were no active weapons of mass destruction programs,'' Drumheller said in a CBS interview to be aired on Sunday on the network's news magazine, ``60 Minutes.''

``The (White House) group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested,'' he was quoted as saying in interview excerpts released by CBS on Friday.

``We said: 'Well, what about the intel?' And they said: 'Well, this isn't about intel anymore. This is about regime change','' added Drumheller, whose CIA operation was assigned the task of debriefing the Iraqi official.

He was the latest former U.S. official to accuse the White House of setting an early course toward war in Iraq and ignoring intelligence that conflicted with its aim.

CBS said the CIA's intelligence source was former Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri and that former CIA Director George Tenet delivered the information personally to President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other top White House officials in September 2002. They rebuffed the CIA three days later.

``The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy,'' the former CIA agent told CBS.

U.S. allegations that Saddam had WMD and posed a threat to international security was a main justification for the March 2003 invasion.

A 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, to which the CIA was a major contributor, concluded that prewar Iraq had an active nuclear program and a huge stockpile of unconventional weapons.

No such weapons have been found, however, and U.S. assertions that they existed are now regarded as a hugely damaging intelligence failure.

But Drumheller, co-author of a forthcoming book entitled ''On the Brink: How the White House Has Compromised American Intelligence,'' rejects the notion of an intelligence failure.

``It just sticks in my craw every time I hear them say it's an intelligence failure,'' he told CBS. ``This was a policy failure.''

nytimes


Only a teaser unless you register, but still an important story in that this confirms that Bush KNEW Iraq did not have the weapons of mass destruction that he told you they did.

In other words, the defense that Bush meant well and that the claim that there were 'nookular' bombs in Iraq was never a simple "honest" mistake, but an outright boldfaced lie with malice aforethought.

Bush lied.

There can be no greater crime by a leader against his own people then to lie them into a war. None.

Bush's credibility is gone. And with it that of every other politician, official, and media talking head that supported that lie. If there is one lesson to be learned from the blogs, it is that the lie was an obvious and easily discredited one. It is beyond the realm of possibility that Congress and the mainstream media, with their vast budgets and huge staffs, could not find the obvious signs of deception being reported by blogs operating on spare change found under seat cushions.

We are witness to an historic first. It is not new that wars are started with lies. Indeed it is hard to find one which is not. What is new is that because of the Internet, the lie that started the war is exposed for all to see and is widely known while the war stared with that lie is still being fought, is still killing and crippling our young people.

There is no "middle ground" when dealing with a lie on any scale. Either one denounces the lie, or one is complicit. In the case of a lie on such am horrific scale, complicity is a grave sin.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 366 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Apr, 2006 12:29 pm
A rank forgery was cherry picked into the SOTU.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Apr, 2006 06:40 pm
What a surprise...not.

CBS said the CIA's intelligence source was former Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri and that former CIA Director George Tenet delivered the information personally to President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other top White House officials in September 2002. They rebuffed the CIA three days later.

``The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy,'' the former CIA agent told CBS.


`It just sticks in my craw every time I hear them say it's an intelligence failure,'' he told CBS. ``This was a policy failure.''
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Apr, 2006 07:17 pm
SonofaBitch!!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ex - CIA Agent Says WMD Intelligence Ignored
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 11:17:00