Why isn't there an ignore function on A2K?

I'll bet there are fluff boys too.

I'll bet there are fluff boys too.

Chai Tea wrote:

I'll bet there are fluff boys too.

No.


Well, not in my imaginary universe anyway, "boy bands" are unheard of there also...yeah it's a nice place.

Now, now...Mark Twain was no idiot!

Quick Ery....

where is Mark Twain from?

Yes, for example, in the IMDb message boards if you ignore someone their posts won't be shown to you.

I was just wondering why this option is not available here.

It'd be handy since threads can grow so much in a2k. It is sometimes almost impossible to read the posts of interest because of all the fluff.

Eryemil wrote:

Yes, for example, in the IMDb message boards if you ignore someone their posts won't be shown to you.

I was just wondering why this option is not available here.

It'd be handy since threads can grow so much in a2k. It is sometimes almost impossible to read the posts of interest because of all the fluff.

It's being made as part of a rewrite of a2k. Users will be able to elect to filter/display posts by several different criteria. By giving the end-user better tools to decide what content they see the rules will be able to be more flexible.

It is useful if done right and it's a planned addition to the new a2k.