1
   

Why isn't there an ignore function on A2K?

 
 
Eryemil
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 07:50 pm
I was just asking why one hadn't been implemented.

It is of no real consquence whether the idea is ever emloyed I suppose.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 10:51 pm
I have created an Ignore function in my head.


I love it...but you have to use the scroll button.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 11:26 pm
I call it a "filter". I turn it up and down depending on who i'm talking to. I even do it at work and in the market. People could be talking to me and I just look at them with a stupid blank look on my face. Soon they think i'm crazy and they give up then I don't have to worry about them. Smile
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 11:35 pm
No comments on it so far.....so I guess everyone must be ignoring the picture of my naked bottom that I posted on page 2.

Oh well......
0 Replies
 
Eryemil
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 11:43 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
No comments on it so far.....so I guess everyone must be ignoring the picture of my naked bottom that I posted on page 2.

Oh well......


No Lord Ellpus, we're trying to forget we saw it. Oh, lord knows we're trying to forget.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 03:48 am
dyslexia wrote:
everyone ignores you Amigo. (even Tico)
Thats not a very nice thing to say about Tico.

But thanks for letting me know your ignoring me again.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 03:57 am
Amigo wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
everyone ignores you Amigo. (even Tico)
Thats not a very nice thing to say about Tico.

But thanks for letting me know your ignoring me again.

no prob dude, a friend in need is a pest.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:09 am
Gus says we should bump all the threads that have gotten no responses, so i thought i'd answer this one.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:33 am
Eryemil wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
How would you determine what is substance and what is fluff if you don't get everything.


I'll admit I tend to discriminate in this situation. Depending how extreme the posts in the first two/three pages are I'll disregard this user's posts further in the thread. (Or possibly permanently)



Well that is very short sighted.

you ignore what you consider fluff from someone, so you never get the opportunity to catch the pearls that are cradled therein.

besides, fluff is what the makes the world go round....the day I get too mature for that, just shoot me.

I'm going to become A2K's official "fluff girl" Shocked

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper309/stills/bf869x16.jpg
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:43 am
I just read the entire thread and was quite surprised to see that dlowan hasn't weighed in yet.
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:48 am
I don't think Craven should waste his time writing code for "ignoring" posts. We should just read what we want and avoid those who irritate or annoy us. Why create extra work for the site? Actually I still do read stuff from posters that I don't care for and I can rant to myself how thick-headed and what-not I might find them, but for some crazy reason I think there is the slight possibility that one day I might learn something new. I don't want this site to be restrictive and see partial pieces of a thread. I'd hate to see an ignore button against posters or subject-matters. Isn't that what personal choice is about? We choose what we read/respond to and dont?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:51 am
I'm not ignoring valuable responses from Oz like others do.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:52 am
Is this where I come to complain about being ignored? I'm sick of it, SICK of it!

There, I feel better. Hello? Is anybody there? HELLO?????
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:57 am
I hear a faint screeching noise.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 08:59 am
Did somebody fart?
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 09:05 am
gnats buzz, they don't screech. <sheesh>
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 10:25 am
im ignoring heeven


shes too smart


damn burd
0 Replies
 
Heeven
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 12:53 pm
<<plop>>

ah that's better!
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 12:53 pm
ehhh


squack-itty squack squack....
0 Replies
 
Eryemil
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 05:53 pm
Chai Tea wrote:
Eryemil wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
How would you determine what is substance and what is fluff if you don't get everything.


I'll admit I tend to discriminate in this situation. Depending how extreme the posts in the first two/three pages are I'll disregard this user's posts further in the thread. (Or possibly permanently)



Well that is very short sighted.

you ignore what you consider fluff from someone, so you never get the opportunity to catch the pearls that are cradled therein.

besides, fluff is what the makes the world go round....the day I get too mature for that, just shoot me.

I'm going to become A2K's official "fluff girl" Shocked

http://media.collegepublisher.com/media/paper309/stills/bf869x16.jpg


You haven't read one of Gunga's posts right?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 07:29:36