1
   

Bush Proves His Harshest Critics Right

 
 
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 08:52 am
On March 17, William Rivers Pitt wrote that Bush is "deranged, disconnected, and dangerous." In his March 20 Cleveland speech, Bush proved Pitt right.

Bush gave a delusional speech that shows he is detached from reality. "We're going to help the Iraqis build a strong democracy that will be an inspiration throughout the Middle East, a democracy that'll be a partner in the global war against the terrorists."
Has no one told Bush that the Iraqis cannot even agree to form a government?

The day before Bush's delusional Cleveland speech, Iyad Allawi, the former prime minister of one of our make-believe Iraqi governments, said that in Iraq the casualty rate from the sectarian strife is so high that "if this is not civil war, then God knows what civil war is."
The day of Bush's delusional speech, Patrick Cockburn, present on the scene in Irbil, Iraq, gave a much more truthful account of the situation. Writing in CounterPunch, he reported:

"Iraq is a country convulsed by fear. It is at its worst in Baghdad. Sectarian killings are commonplace. ? The scale of the violence is such that most of it is unreported. ? Unseen by the outside world, silent populations are on the move, frightened people fleeing neighborhoods where their community is in a minority for safer districts. There is also a growing reliance on militias because of fears that police patrols or checkpoints are in reality death squads hunting for victims."
Not a word of this reality from our delusional president.

The fantasy Iraq that Bush painted was only his warm-up. He went on to tell his Cleveland audience that America could not be safe unless Iraq was a democracy. What a weak, pitiful, vulnerable place Bush's America must be. Unless a small, devastated Middle Eastern country is a democracy, America cannot be safe. Who in the Cleveland audience could possibly have believed this utter nonsense?

Bush told his audience that "the security of our country is directly linked to the liberty of the Iraqi people, and we will settle for nothing less than victory." What victory is he talking about? Despite the huge sums of dollars paid by the Bush regime to all the leaders of all the factions, Iraq cannot form a government.

Without victory, Iraq will be "a safe haven for terrorists to plot new attacks against our nation." Alas, there were no terrorists in Iraq until Bush invaded the country and drew them in. The problem our troops face in Iraq is not terrorists, but resistance fighters, "insurgents" in the Bush regime's parlance. Democracies lack the dictatorial, extralegal powers to suppress terrorists. That is why Bush is destroying civil liberties in the U.S. Under Saddam Hussein, there were no terrorists and no insurgents. Bush is modeling his no habeas corpus, torture-prone, all-intrusive government on Saddam Hussein's.

The security of Americans has nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq. Iraq cannot overthrow the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the separation of powers, and American civil liberties. Iraq cannot illegally spy on American citizens, declare them to be "suspects," and detain them forever without warrant or charges. Iraq cannot put American critics of the Bush regime on "no-fly" lists.

The real dangers to Americans reside in the neocon Bush administration. This delusional warmonger administration believes it has the power and the right to dictate to Muslim countries their political and social institutions. This extraordinary arrogance and hubris breeds opposition where there was none. The world is not going to obey Bush and a handful of stupid neocons.

In his speech, Bush told Cleveland that "the decision to remove Saddam Hussein was a difficult decision." That is a lie. Bush's first treasury secretary, Paul O'Neill, and a number of others have reported that Bush came into office intending to remove Hussein. The head of British intelligence told the British Cabinet that Bush first decided to go to war and then created the reasons to justify his aggression against Iraq.
"Before we acted," Bush told his audience, Hussein's "regime was defying UN resolutions calling for it to disarm. It was violating cease-fire agreements, was firing on American and British pilots which were enforcing no-fly zones." Gentle reader, think what Bush is saying. As Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, a fact that Bush has acknowledged, how could Iraq possibly have been violating UN resolutions calling on it to disarm?

What cease-fire agreements is Bush talking about? It was U.S. and UK planes that continued to fly over Iraqi territory and bomb Iraqis.
Do you know what Bush means by no-fly zones? He means that U.S. and UK jet fighters could fly all over Iraq, but if Iraqi planes flew over Iraqi territory, we would shoot them down.

Where did the U.S. get the right to tell countries that they dare not try to control their own air space?

Americans need to understand that terrorists are responding to America's behavior, or misbehavior. The only successful way to stop terrorism is to alter our behavior. America is not God. It has no right, and it certainly lacks the power, to impose its will on the world.

The Bush regime cannot lead the world to democracy by tearing democracy down at home. Not since Abraham Lincoln have American civil liberties been so threatened as by the Bush regime. America even has an attorney general, a vice president, and a secretary of defense who believe in torture. How do they differ from officials in the Third Reich or Stalin's KGB? Anyone who believes in torture is not an American. That person is outside our tradition. Yet people who believe in torture who occupy our highest offices.

When we get the mote out of our own eye, then we can instruct the Middle East........................Paul Craig Roberts

http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=8737
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 924 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 09:32 am
"The only successful way to stop terrorism is to alter our behavior." That goes for Israel too.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 09:40 am
Why the big type? Do you think we're all hard-of-seeing?
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 10:08 am
It's for old folks like me.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 10:27 am
source
0 Replies
 
Magginkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 10:35 am
xingu wrote:
It's for old folks like me.


And like me Xingu.

I don't know why it's so offensive to some that some of us need a larger print from time to time. It's as though they think it will never happen to them. I guess it's a good thing that I am almost deaf too, so I can't hear what they say!
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 10:38 am
It is Not Time to Investigate or Censure; It is Time for Impeachment!
March 18, 2006
The recommendations continue regarding investigating grounds for impeaching George W. Bush as well as censure. Periodically we also read and hear about petition efforts to attack Bush, Cheney, or Rumsfeld.

The time for such actions has long passed. The term "arrogance of power" that was reiterated so often in analyzing the actions of President Richard M. Nixon three decades ago has been carried to new meaning through the ruthless exercise of power by an unelected ruling Junta led by Dick Cheney.

Despite the Cheney-Bush Junta's disdain for France, the comment that unlike any other epitomizes its rule was attributed to France's King Louis XIV of "L'etat, c'est moi." This translates to "I am the state," directly applicable to a scorched earth policy by Cheney-Bush in which the United States Constitution has, according to some, been trashed with impunity.

The Constitution has been as much a victim of abandonment as have the poor and middle class socioeconomic elements in the Cheney-Bush economic experience. When Bush seeks to treat war launching in Iraq as no more than a judgment error on weapons of mass destruction that yielded positive results in the end, he is engaging in insidious distortion.

The record is clear. From the time they entered office the Cheney-Bush tandem, aided and abetted by the Project for the New American Century's leading forces such as Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and William Kristol, trained a collective focus on Iraq and toppling the neocons' former ally of Reagan Administration days, Saddam Hussein, from power.

While the stated focus was ultimately to bring democracy to Iraq, in reality a ruling corporate Junta led by the former company Dick Cheney headed before returning to Washington in his Junta leadership role, Halliburton, along with Bechtel and Monsanto took effective control.

The cost overruns have been disgraceful while an Uncle Scrooge mentality prevailed when it came to the safety of U.S. forces, as exemplified by their family members needing to resort to the Internet source of E-Bay to acquire body armor.

Meanwhile civil liberties were trampled at home under the guise of applied vigilance against terrorist threats while our ports of entry became increasingly vulnerable. The Cheney-Bush hallmark of concrete action falling perilously short of boisterous rhetoric was in evidence.

As for those who were captured, in defining them as "enemy combatants" the Junta sought to exempt them from the standards of conduct inherent in the Geneva Codes, to which we were a signatory, as Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay became synonymous with the same kind of cold blooded torture associated with the bloodiest of totalitarian regimes.

There will be no Constitution in effect as long as the current regime remains in power. There need not be any declaration confirming this tragic reality. Actions speak louder than words and the conduct of the ruling Junta makes it abundantly clear that constitutional democracy is dead and buried for the duration.

Many of the same prophets of reality who are currently being denounced for advocating impeachment were earlier ridiculed for a 2004 prophecy. The earlier statement in question was that the Cheney-Rove strategy team would not accept a presidential election defeat.

Some thought that this prophecy, if accurate, would lead to a declaration of martial law following a Bush electoral loss after a manufactured or imminently posed "terrorist threat." A less risky and more practical response was more feasible.

With Walden O'Dell and Diebold Incorporated becoming an increasingly important factor in the election firmament and Republicans holding power in so many key precincts and offices in battleground states, as exemplified by Secretary of State Ken Blackwell in Ohio, no martial law declaration was needed, only a tweaking of election results.

The exit poll results that Bush supporter Dick Morris called well nigh infallible gave Kerry a 3 percent edge while the official results showed the reverse for a 6-point swing.

Combine the foregoing factors and, like it or not, the chilling result is at least a de facto dictatorship. The debating point, deemed ultimately academic by circumstances, is whether such a dictatorship is de facto or existing on its face.

Constitutional government has been demolished. The only way to retrieve it is through removing from office the destroyers. As Benjamin Franklin said when asked, at the close of the Constitutional Convention, what kind of government the new nation possessed, "A Republic if you can keep it."

That Republic has vanished. Shouldn't we seek to reclaim it? http://www.politicalcortex.com/story/2006/3/18/231652/230
0 Replies
 
Magginkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 10:39 am
With our little adventure in Iraq becoming more disastrous and costly by the day, and with the all-too-familiar election year militarism heating up over Iran, this country has some very serious and consequential choices to make about our foreign policy. A substantive and frank discussion is exactly what we did not have leading up to the Iraq War, where war opponents were mocked and smeared and their arguments scorned but not answered. We should not allow the Instapundits and The New York Sun's of the world to drive our country -- again -- into foreign policy debacles through the use of character smear and cheap sloganeering in lieu of adult, meaningful and serious discussions about our foreign policy and the people who are seeking to shape it.

But one need not agree with them to recognize the importance of the issues they raise and of the equally important need to be able to discuss them without the smear tactics and personal attacks which, increasingly, have become the only tactic left to Bush followers.

Various matters
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/
0 Replies
 
Magginkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Mar, 2006 07:26 pm
My Youngest Son Came Home Today
Eric Bogle

My youngest son came home today.
His friends marched with him all the way.
The fife and drum beat out the time,
While in his box of polished pine,
Like dead meat on a butcher's tray,

My youngest son came home today.
My youngest son was a fine young man
With a wife, a daughter, and two sons,
And a man he would have lived and died,
Till by a bullet sanctified.
Now he's a saint, or so they say --

They brought their young saint home today.
An Irish sky looks down and weeps
Upon the narrow Belfast streets
At children's blood in gutters spilled
In dreams of glory unfulfilled
As part of freedom's price to pay
My youngest son came home today.
My youngest son came home today.

His friends marched with him all the way.
The pipe and drum beat out the time
While in his box of polished pine,
Like dead meat on a butcher's tray,
My youngest son came home today --
And this time he's here to stay.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Proves His Harshest Critics Right
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 01:09:20